BEHIND THE LODGE DOOR

PAUL A. FISHER

Although Freemasonry operates secretly, there is a surprising
amount of information available about its influence on society.

For example, an article in the New Age, in 1946, called attention
to the following remark by former French premier Andre Tardieu,
who died the previous year:

"Freemasonry does not explain everything; yet, if we leave it out
of account, the history of our times is unintelligible:"

Masonic author and commentator Arthur E. Waite, writing about the
33rd degree of Freemasonry, said:

"It must be confessed that the whole scheme has a certain aspect
of conspiracy continually presenting itself and as frequently
eluding the mental grasp:"

In 1976, a book by Fred Zeller, former Grand Master of the Grand
Orient of France, titled, Trois Points, C'est Tout (Three Points,
That's All), revealed that between 1912 and 1971, all of the
Third and much of the Fourth Republic of France was dominated by
Freemasons, who fought two major anti-clerical reforms in a
battle against Church influence.

And, in 1981, the world learned of the machinations of Grand
Master Licio Gelli's Masonic Lodge known as Propaganda Due, or 
P-2, which precipitated the fall of the Italian Government that
same year.

Despite that known background of Masonic intrigue, there
continues to be a reluctance by the media and social commentators
to expose Masonry's long history of working to subvert Church and
State.

It is true the press did inform the public that Gelli's lodge
included three Cabinet ministers, two under-secretaries, 30
members of Parliament, 70 top military officers, and a number of
magistrates, civil servants, industrialists, university
professors, policemen and journalists, among whom was the editor
and publisher of one of the nation's most prestigious daily
newspapers, Corriere della Sera.

The press also disclosed the financial machinations and tragedies
surrounding bankers Roberto Calvi and Michele Sindona, including
the former's strange death at Blackfriar's Bridge in London, and
involement of the Vatican Bank with those two Masonic bankers.

However, the press gave virtually no attention to the larger
picture, that is, the philosophy and activities of the Freemason
Fraternity itself, of which P-2 was a progeny.
Yet,it must be noted that Rupert Cornwell, Rome correspondent for
the London Financial Times, does say in his book, God's Banker,
which reports on the issue: "As early as 1738 Pope Clement XII
described freemasonry as `Satan's synagogue'."

And, the British journalist added, the Pope's fears "were well
grounded:"

The Financial Times correspondent characterized P-2 as a "a state
within a state;" and "little short of a parallel state:" He also
observed that Italy's late Fascist dictator, Benito Mussolini,
had outlawed secret Masonic lodges. 

Still, despite the mind-boggling reality of what this one Roman
Masonic lodge had done by gaining allegiance of so many key
government officials, industrialists, members of the academic
commuity and others, it seems curious that background information
concerning P-2's parent entity, the Masonic Fraternity itself,
was ignored by the media. It seems curious, because Freemasonry,
over the centuries, is known to have played a secret and
extraordinary role in attempting to mold societies according to
its tenets.

What Mussolini Found

However, Cornwell's references to Pope Clement XII and Mussolini
do provide a clue as to what the world-wide Masonic Fraternity is
all about.

In that regard, the New Age, in one of a series of articles in
1949, commented on Mussolini's closing of the lodges prior to
World War II.

(The series was written, incidentally, upon the recommendation of
Justice Robert H. Jackson, who at that time was a 32nd degree
Mason, and had recently returned to the United States after
having taken leave from the Supreme Court to serve as Chief
Prosecutor at the Nuremberg War Crimes Trials).

The article said the Italian dictator was prompted to investigate
Masonic lodges after he noticed many Socialist deputies and
government employees "obeyed the orders of Freemasonry in
preference to the orders of the Socialist Party:"

It should be noted that the Masonic cult "adhered to Fascism at
the beginning;" and "officially was never hostile" to it until Il
Duce prepared legislation against secret societies. 

As a result of observing what he perceived as disloyalty among
the Masons, Mussolini approved the appointment of a 15-member
commission comprised "mostly of Senators and university
professors;" who "unanimously advised the suppression" of the
lodges-because:

       Italian Freemasonry was "dominated by an anti-national   
   state of mind:"

   The Craft obliged its members to "deny they are    
   Masons," thus contributing to "corrupt the character of  
   Italians:"

   Freemasonry used its hold upon the machinery of Government 
   in favor of purely private interests and ambitions.

The report, in many ways, so strikingly similar to the Italian
Government's findings in 1981, further stated:

"Freemasonry has penetrated into the most delicate organs of the
national life, using as in lever the chief banking institutions.
. . Its chief weapon is secrecy, which debases men's conscience,
making them prone to intrigue and obliging them to submit to
discipline against which they cannot rebel without breaking their
vows: [this] forces them to maintain an internal solidarity which
annuls or overcomes every other duty of loyalty or justice, and .
. . insures inununity to any one who profits by it.

"When one thinks of the characteristics of Freemasonry which have
been set down above, and especially its ties with similar
organizations abroad, one realizes that the existence of
Freemasonry is a phenomenon of such gravity that it seems
unbelievable that the State has permitted it hitherto:"

At that point, the article refers to a 1947 statement made by
John Cowles, Grand Commander of the Scottish Rite of the Southern
Jurisdiction, for the purpose of emphasizing the preeminent role
played by Raoul V. Palermi, the former Grand Commander of Masonry
in Italy who renounced the Fraternity and became friendly with
Mussolini. 

Cowles said ;

"In Italy, the regular Freemasonry stems as follows: Garibaldi,
Ballori, Fera, Ricciardi, Burgess (Acting), and Palermi. The last
named was head of both the Grand Lodge and the Supreme Council.
He betrayed them both, proving a traitor, was expelled from
Freemasonry, and later given a position under Mussolini . . "

Cowles then referred to the situation facing Masonry in Italy
immediately following World War II, long after Mussolini had been
executed. The post-War government, he noted, adopted a new
constitution which included a provision (Article 14) prohibiting
the existence of secret societies. 

The fact that the Grand Commander of Italian Freemasonry was
"given a position under Mussolini;" strongly indicates that
Mussolini and his Commission had first hand evidence about the
activities of Freemasonry.

Further, the fact that the new post-War government felt compelled
to place a provision in the constitution banning secret societies
gives credence to the findings of Mussolini's 15-member
commission, and its fears about what such organizations can do to
subvert a State.

However, Cowles noted that the new post-war Prime Minister,
Alcide de Gasperi, a Christian Democrat, insisted that he did not
view Freemasonry as a secret society, and would not war against
it. 

In retrospect, it appears that de Gasperi's naivete regarding the
Masonic Fratemity in 1947 contributed to the P-2 scandal of 1981.

Church Exposes Masonry In 1738

Freemasonry, as we generally know it today, entered history when
the Grand Lodge of England was established in 1717.

In 1723, Rev. James Anderson, an English divine, wrote his "New
Constitutions" for the Craft, many parts of which were "lifted"
from the works of Jan Amos Komensky (also known as Jan Amos
Comenius), a 17th Century bishop of the Moravian Church.
Anderson's "Constitutions" changed English Masonry from a more or
less Christian orientation to "a universal creed based upon the
Fatherhood of God and the Brotherhood of Man." This fundamental
ideology of Komensky appealed at once "to freethinkers, to
rationalists, and to lovers of magic and esoteric rites-to the
love of mystery in myths, symbols and ceremonies:" 

Fifteen years later, in 1738, Pope Clement XII, as Rupert
Cornwell observed, issued his Pontifical Constitution, In
Eminenti. The Pontiff declared:

"We have resolved and decreed to condenm and forbid such [secret]
societies, assemblies, reunions, conventions, aggregations or
meetings, called either Freemasonic or known under some other
denomination. We condemn and forbid them by this, our present
constitution, which is to be considered valid forever.

"We commend to the faithful to abstain from intercourse with
those societies . . . in order to avoid excommunication, which
will be the penalty imposed upon all those contravening to this,
our order, none except at the point of death, could be absolved
of this sin, except by us or the then existing Roman Pontiff."

That, indeed, was a very severe indictment of blossoming Masonry,
to have the Pope caution his international flock that membership
in this new secret society was considered a "reserved sin;"
absolution for which, except at the point of death, was reserved
to the Holy Father personally. However, just thirteen years
later, Pope Benedict XIV, in his Pontifical Constitution,
Providas, reaffirmed Clement's censure of Masonry and similar
secret societies. Moreover, since that time "more than 200"
documents issued by the Vatican have condemned Masonry, although
the "reserved sin" status was dispensed with by Pope Paul VI, and
the Church began a rapprochement with the secret society in the
1940s. That aspect of Masonic-Catholic Church relationships will
be discussed later.

Barruel And Robison's Revelations

The general public's first true insight into Freemasonry did not
come until 81 years after the Fraternity's founding, when two
books lifted the veil which so decorously had concealed the
Craft's activities, except as had been exposed earlier by the
Vatican and, occasionally, by heads of State.

One book was written by John Robison, a highly regarded professor
of philosophy and a member of the Royal Society of Edinburg. The
Scottish professor said he found Masonry on the Continent much
different than he knew it in the Lodges of England. Continental
Masonry, he wrote, exhibited "a strange mixture of mysticism,
theosophy, cabalistic whim, real science, fanaticism and
freethinking, both in religion and politics." He found, too, that
although everything was expressed decently, "atheism,
materialism, and discontent with civil subordination pervade the
whole."

A more detailed expose of the Craft was set forth in a
four-volume work by the Abbe Augusten de Barruel, a refugee from
Revolutionary France , whose third volume was going to press just
as Robison's book was being published. 

Barruel charged that many years prior to the French Revolution,
men who called themselves "philosophers," conspired against God
of the Gospel, against Christianity, without distinction of
worship. The grand object of the "conspiracy;" the Abbe asserted,
was to overturn every altar where Christ was adored. 

These philosophers, the Abbe asserted, formed the sophisters of
rebellion, who joined with Freemasons-a group he characterized as
having a "long history" of hatred for Christ and kings.
Continuing, the French-born cleric said that from this coalition
came the "Sophisters of Impiety and Anarchy," who conspired
"against every religion, every government, against all civil
society, and even against all property . . " This latter crowd
became known as the llluminati, from which sprang the Jacobins. 

Although this philosophy was believed to have been gestated in
England, in reality, said the Abbe, it is "the error of every man
who judges everything by the standard of his own reason, and
rejects in all religious matters every authority that is not
derived from the light of nature. It is the error of denying
every possibility of any mystery beyond the limits of man's
reason, and the discard of Revelation." 

The leading "philosophers" of whom Barruel spoke were the major
Encyclopedists: Voltaire, Frederick II, King of Prussia, Denis
Diderot and Jean D'Alembert. These men, he asserted, "acted in
concert" to destroy Christianity and, he declared, the proofs of
the conspiracy are drawn from their writings. 

The Abbe quoted Voltaire as saying: "I am weary of hearing people
repeat that twelve men have been sufficient to establish
Christianity, and I will prove that one man may suffice to
overthrow it."

The French historian noted that the principal Encyclopedists had 
a secret language and, in that connection, he cited a letter from
Voltaire to D'Alembert in which it is stated: "the vine of truth
is well cultivated. Translated, the statement means: "We make
amazing progress against religion."

Masonic sources, it should be noted, frequently have pointed out
that most of the major actors among the Encyclopedists were
Masons. 

[In that regard, Robison and Barruel are cited rather extensively
in the following paragraphs, in order to establish that what was
attested to of Masonry in Europe in the 18th Century has been
confirmed by Masonic sources as a substantially accurate
representation of Freemasonry in America and Europe in the 20th
Century.]

Barruel said he was invited to become a member of the lower
grades of Masonry, and consented to take the first two degrees
which were given to him outright and in a humorous vein.

However, the third degree ritual demanded unswerving obedience to
the orders of the Grand Master, even though those orders might be
contrary to the King, or any other sovereign. Despite not
agreeing to so bind himself, Barruel received the degree of
Master Mason 

Those admitted to the first three degrees of Masonry, he
explained, learn that Masonic and Christian eras do not coincide.
For the Mason, the Year of Light begins at Creation, thus
ante-dating Moses, the Prophets and Jesus Christ 

He noted that many beliefs of Masonry are quite similar to the
beliefs and practices of the Manachees, such as the "follies" of
the Kabbalah and magic; indifference to all religion; the same
terrible oaths; and symbols of sun, moon and stars used inside
the lodges. 

The French cleric described his own initiation and its attendant
ceremonies and oaths. His accountt confirms that the Craft's
degree and initiatory ceremonies of 1798 are almost identical to
the Fraternity's practices today. 

He said his own initiation gave him sufficient credibility to
converse with those whom he know to be more advanced in Masonry,
"and in many of these interviews it happened, that,
notwithstanding all their secrecy, some unguarded expressions
escaped the most zealous adepts, which threw light on the
subject." Other Masons, he continued, lent him their books,
"presuming that their obscureness and the want of essential
words, or the method of discovering them, would baffle all my
attempts to understand them."

With such understanding, he was able to learn the degree of
Knight of the Rose Crucis, "or the Rosicrucians." The ornaments
of the Lodge in that degree recall to the candidate "the solemn
Mystery of Mount Calvary."

The Lodge room was draped in black with an altar prominently
displayed, above which were three crosses. The middle one bore
the inscription: "I.N.R.I."

"The brethren in sacerdotal vestments are seated on the ground
in the most profound silence, resting their heads on their arms
to represent their grief," Barruel wrote.

But, he said, it was "not the death of the Son of God, who died
victim of our sins, that was the cause of their affliction."
Rather, it was Christ's Crucifixion and the establishment of
Christianity which moved the brethren to mourn loss of "the word,
that is [their] pretended natural Religion . . . ," which dates
from that sacred Day.

This was evidenced in the ceremony, the Abbe said, by the
response of the Senior Warden when he is asked the time of day by
the Master of the Lodge. The Warden replied:

"It is the first hour of the day, the time when the veil of the
temple was rent asunder, when darkness and consternation was
spread over the earth, when the light was darkened, when the
implements of Masonry were broken, when the flaming star
disappeared, when the cubic stone was broken, when the word was
lost." 

Those revelations about the Philosophy and activities of
Freemasonry were no less sensational than were the disclosures of
Barruel and Robison regarding the Bavarian Order of llluminati.
The Order was a secret society founded by Professor Adam
Weishaupt of Ingolstadt, Germany, and records show it was closely
intwined with Masonry. Members of the Order, Barruel found, were
the secret Masters of Masonry. 

Knowledge of the Order became public during search of a house
occupied by one of the leaders, as well as by conununications
discovered at the Castle of Sandersdorf, a meeting place of the
group. Other infortmation was made known by an unidentified spy
within the Order, and by depositions given by four professors of
the Marianen Academy in Bavaria, who were members of the
Organization.

Weishaupt held views which, in later years, were echoed by the
founding philosophers and adepts of international Conununism, as
well as others. Weishaupt proclaimed:

"Liberty and Equality are the essential rights that man in his
original and primitive perfection received from nature. Property
struck the first blow at Equality; political society or
Governments were the first dispossessors of Liberty: the
supporters of Governments and Property are the religious and
civil laws; therefore, to reinstate man in his primitive rights
of Equality and Liberty, we must begin by destroying all
Religion, all civil society and finish by the destruction of all
Property."

According to Barruel, the doctrines of Illuminism came to Europe
from Egypt through a Jutland merchant. 

Although Weishaupt hated religion, above all the Catholic Church,
he greatly admired the effectiveness of her religious orders-
particularly the Jesuits-in spreading the Gospel throughout the
world. "What these men have done for the altar and throne, why
should I not do in opposition to the altar and throne,; the
Bavarian professor remarked. 

Robison, referring to testimony of the four Marianen Academy
professors, said the Order of Illuminati abjured Christianity;
promoted sensual pleasures; considered suicide justifiable;
viewed patriotism and loyalty to country as narrow-minded
prejudices incompatible with universal benevolence; held private
property a hindrance to happiness; and insisted that the goals of
the Order were superior to all else. 

Also, he observed, members of the Order could be found only in
the Lodges of Masonry. 

The Edinburg scholar said members of the group "insinuated
themselves into all public offices, and particularly into the
courts of justice."

Weishaupt told his followers: "We must win the common people in
every corner. This will be obtained chiefly by means of the
schools, and by open, hearty behavior. Show condescension,
popularity, and toleration of their prejudices, which we at
leisure shall root out and dispel."

Continuing in the same vein, he said: "If a writer publishes
anything that attracts notice, and is in itself just but does not
accord with our plan, we must endeavor to win him over-or decry
him."

The strength of the Order of Illuminati, he said, lies in its
concealment; let it never appear in any place in its own name,
but always covered by another name and another occupation. None
is fitter than the three lower degrees of Freemasonry. . . . 

In addition to Masonry as a cover for Illuminati activities,
Weishaupt recommended that members if the Order find concealment
in "a learned or literary society" which "may be a powerful
engine in our hands."

He taught his followers to try to obtain influence in all offices
which have any effect in "forming or in managing, or even in
directing the mind of man. . . "

All members of the Order, he said, "must be assisted . . . [and]
preferred to all persons otherwise of equal merit."

The organization believed that Jesus established no new religion,
but only "set religion and reason in their ancient rights."

Using the arcane language of Illuminism to explain his views on
social conditions and the remedy for shaping society in the
Order's mold, Weishaupt, in a letter to a colleague, referred to
a "rough, split, and polished stone:' The differences were
explained as characterizing the rough and split stones as man's
condition under civil government: "rough by ever fretting
inequality of condition; and split since we are no longer one
family, and are further divided by differences of government,
rank, property and religion." However, when these differences are
eliminated, and peoples of the world are "reunited in one family,
we are represented by the polished stone." 

"Examine, read, think," Weishaupt admonished his devotees as he
urged them to understand symbols and symbolic language used by
the Order. Explaining, he instructed his followers: "There are
many things which one cannot find out without a guide, nor ever
learn without instructions . . . Your Superiors . . . know the
true path-but will not point it out. Enough if they assist you in
every approach to it." Thus, the need for the membership at large
to "examine, read, think."

The new Illuminee was "particularly recommended to study the
doctrine of the ancient Gnostics and Manichaens, which may lead
him to many important discoveries on the real Masonry."

The Illuminati, Robision said, hoped to use women by hinting of
their "emancipation from the tyranny of public opinion."

The great aim of the Order, said the Scotch scholar, "is to make
men happy," by "making them good." This was to be accomplished by
"enlightening the mind, and freeing it from the dominion of
superstition and prejudice."

Robison also observed that Weishaupt was firm in the conviction
that the Ancient Mysteries "were useful to mankind, containing
rational doctrines of natural religion."
Professor Renner, one of the Marianen Academy scholars who gave a
written deposition about his knowledge of the Illuminati, said
the Order bound adepts by subduing their minds "with the most
magnificent promises, and assure . . . the protection of great
personages ready to do everything for the advancement of its
members at the recommendation of the Order."

The Order enticed into its lodges only those who could be useful:
"Statesmen, . . . counsellors, secretaries . . . professors,
abbes, preceptors, physicians, and apothecaries are always
welcome candidates to the Order." 

According to a joint deposition signed by Professor Renner and
his three colleagues, the object of the first degrees of
Illuminism was to train the adepts in the system of espionage.
Once the member had so committed himself to such nefarious acts
of espionage, treason, or other treacherous enterprises, he
remained in a state of perpetual dread, fearing his superiors
might at some time reveal the criminal activity, the four
academicians testified. 

The revelations of Robison and Barruel caused a sensation, not
only in Europe, but in America, and were synopsized in newspapers
and recommended for reading.

On December 4, 1794, The erald of New York editorialized on the
history of the French Revolution, and said that history was the
history of "the Popular Societics, the principal moving springs
of action during the whole revolution." The editorial urged
owners of newspapers in the new nation to make the hisbry of
those societies known, and recommended the works of Barruel and
Robison.

Further evidence of the popularity of the works of Barruel and
Robison in America was indicated when a Protestant minister, G.W.
Snyder of Frederick, Maryland, sent to President George
Washington a copy of Robison's book, with a covering letter,. He
said the President should be familiar with many of the points
made by the Scottish scholar, since Mr. Washington was himself a
Mason.

The President responded by noting that he never had presided over
any Masonic Lodge, and had visited such establishments very
seldom. Further, he observed, he did not believe the Lodges in
the United States were "contaminated" with the principles of
Illuminism. 

In a follow-up letter to Rev. Snyder, the President elaborated on
his position and conceded that the doctrines of the Illuminism
and Jacobins had indeed spread to the United States. No one, Mr.
Washington said, "is more truly satisfied of this fact than I
am."

Continuing, he said: " . . I did not believe that the Lodges of
Freemasons in this country had, as societies, endeavored to
propagate the diabolical tenets of the first [the Illuminati], or
the pernicious principles of the latter [Jacobins] (if they are
susceptible of separation). That individuals of them [Masonic
Lodges] may have done it, or that the founder or instrument
employed to found the Democratic Societies in the United States,
may have had these objects; and actually had a separation of the
People from their Government in view, is too evident to be
questioned." 

Freemasonry In Early America

The first Lodge of Freemasonry in America was established at
Philadelphia in 1730, and claimed Benjamin Franklin as a member.
Indeed, many leaders of the American Revolution, including
Washington, were members of the Craft. That is not surprising,
since many of them also were Deists, the forerunner to modern day
Unitarianism.

Historian Paul Hazard observed that Deists believed there "must
be no form of constraint." They found no need for priests,
ministers, nor rabbis. No more sacraments, rites, nor ceremonies;
no more fasting, mortifying the flesh; no more going to church or
synagogue. The Bible, to Deists, was a book just like any other. 

Deism, said Hazard, became devoted to the law of nature and free
thinking; and upon the heels of Deism and Natural Religion, came
Freemasonry. 

Actually, Masons were most active in bringing about the
Revolutionary War in America, according to the New Age. A 1940
editorial in that publication declared: "It was the Masons who
brought on the war, and it was Masonic generals who carried it
through to a successful conclusion. In fact, the famous Boston
Tea Party, which precipitated the war, was actually a recessed
meeting of a Masonic Lodge." 

French historian Bernard Fay, writing of the Boston Tea Party,
said the incident emanated from a tavern known as the "Green
Dragon or the Arms of Freemasonry." A shabby band of "Redskins"
were seen to leave the tavern on the afternoon of December 16,
1773, although no such persons had been seen to enter the
building.

The group, reported Fay, rushed to the docks, jumped onto the
ships anchored there, and threw tea into the harbor. The
"Redskins" returned to the Green Dragon, but were never seen to
leave. 

Fay also said Benjamin Franklin established a "network of Masonic
newspapers" in all the English colonies, one of the most
prominent of which was Peter Zenger's Journal in New York. 

Franklin, Fay wrote, utilized French Freemasons to aid the
American Revolution. The American Revolutionary activist
ingratiated himself to the widow of Claude Adrien Helvetius, the
wealthy Encyclopedist, banker and atheist, who helped found the
Lodge of Nine Muses-the intellectual center of French
Freemasonry.

Through Madame Helvetius, Franklin was admitted to the Nine Muses
and became Master of the Lodge. There he devoted himself to a
propaganda campaign which swung French public opinion in favor of
the American Masonic cause. Franklin's "admirable work," said
Fay, was the most carefully planned and most efficiently
organized propaganda ever accomplished, and "made possible the
military intervention of France on the side of the Americans."

Moreover, he asserted, Franklin's work also had "a great
intellectual influence throughout Europe, spreading the idea, or
what might be called the myth, of virtuous revolution." Up until
that time, the French historian said, revolutions had been viewed
"as crimes against society." Subsequently, revolutions "were
accepted as a step in progress of the world," a step and a
perception which "originated with the American Revolution and
grew out of Franklin's propaganda."

Legislatures Investigate U.S. Masonry

Despite the fact that Masonry was active in America since 1730,
it was not until disclosures in "The Morgan Affair," almost 100
years later, that the American people became acutely aware of the
Fraternity's "secret work."

When the public heard that one William Morgan, a Mason of
Batavia, New York, allegedly had been murdered by members of the
Craft for disclosing its secrets, the outcry was so vehement and
widespread that thousands of the brethren resigned from the
Fraternity. Legislatures of the States of New York, Massachusetts
and Pennsylvania initiated investigations into the secret
operations of Freemasonry, and developed testimony which was both
amazing and frightening. The purported benevolent Fraternity was
revealed to be a state within a state and bound its adherents
with the most gruesome and terrifying oaths. In the national
elections of 1830, the anti-Masonic political party mustered
130,000 votes.

The report of the New York State Senate Committee said of
Freemasonry:

"It comprises men of rank, wealth, office and talents in
power-and that almost in every place where power is of any
importance-it comprises, among the other classes of the
community, to the lowest, in large numbers, and capable of being
directed by the efforts of others so as to to have the force of
concert through the civilized world!

"They are distributed too, with the means of knowing each other,
and the means of keeping secret, and the means of cooperating, in
the desk, in the legislative hall, on the bench, in every
gathering of men of business, in every party of pleasure, in
every enterprise of government, in every domestic circle, in
peace and in war, among its enemies and friends , in one place as
well as another. So powerful, indeed, is it at this time, that it
fears nothing from violence, either public or private, for it has
every means to learn it in season, to counteract, defeat and
punish it. . . "

The report noted that there were approximately 30,000 Freemasons
in the State of New York-about one-fourth of the eligible voting
population-"yet they have held for forty years, three-fourths" of
all public offices in the State. 

Commenting on a situation which has perdured through the years,
the report addressed the attitude of the press, as follows:

"The public press, that mighty engine for good or for evil, has
been, with a few honorable exceptions, silent as the grave. This
self proclaimed sentinel of freedom, has felt the force of
masonic influence, or has been smitten with the rod of its
power."

The New York legislators said Masonic witnesses on the stand
"have sworn to facts, which in the opinion of bystanders, were
not credited by a single one of the hundreds of persons who were
present." Moreover, grand juries, "a majority of whom were
masons," omitted to find bills of indictment "when there was
proof before them of outrages not surpassed in grossness and
indecency by any committed in the country since the first
settlement."

The committee also disclosed some of the oaths taken by
Freemasons testified to by former Masons who recently had
resigned from the Fraternity. Those providing such testimony were
"personally known to a majority of the committee" as "men of
standing in the community, whose characters for veracity are
beyond reach of calumny." 

Penalties accepted by Masons in the first three degrees were:

Entered Apprentice: "To have his throat cut across, his tongue
taken out by the roots, and his body buried in the ocean."

Fellow Craft: "To have his left breast torn open, his heart and
vitals taken from thence , and thrown over his left shoulder, and
carried to the Valley of Jehosaphat, there to become a prey to
the wild beasts of the field and the vultures of the air."

Master Mason: "To have his body severed in two in the midst and
divided to the north and south, his bowels burnt to ashes in the
center, and the ashes scattered to the four winds of heaven."

Royal Arch: "To have his skull struck off, and his brains exposed
to the scorching rays of a meridian sun." 

Much of the same information uncovered by the New York Senate in
1829, also was found five years later to be common in the State
of Massachusetts, when a Joint Committee of the legislature of
the latter State investigated the Craft.

Masons invited to appear before the Joint Committee refused to do
so, and though the Massachusetts House approved subpoena pvwer
for the committee, the State Senate refused to do so. 

The committee found Freemasonry was "a distinct Independent
Government within our own Government, and beyond the control of
the laws of the land by means of its secrecy, and the oaths and
regulations which its subjects are bound to obey, under penalties
of death." The committee added: "in no Masonic oath presented to
the committee, is there any reservation made of the Constitution
and the laws of the land. 

The Joint Committee found Freemasonry to be a "moral evil," a
"pecuniary evil," and a "political evil."

In 1836, a conunittee of the House of Representatives of the
State of Pennsylvania was provided additional testimony which
largely confirmed what the legislatures of the two other States
had learned about Freemasonry.

The Pennsylvania panel was informed that a Master Mason ,
promises under oath to protect the secrets of a brother Master
Mason, "murder and treason only excepted, and those at my own
option."

In all, nineteen witnesses refused to provide sworn testimony to
the committee. Other witnesses informed the legislators that
Masons influence judicial decisions and consider Masonic oaths
superior to all other oaths. 

Other Early Activities Of U.S. Masonry

But the State legislative committees never learned of numerous
other activities of Masonry which remained virtually unknown to
the public at large.

For example, members of the Craft overthrew the Spanish
government of Baton Rouge, Louisiana in 1810 and ran up their own
flag, a lone silver star on a field of blue, to establish their
"newly created Republic of West Florida." The star represented
the "five points of fellowship" under which the ringleaders of
the rebellion held their meetings. 

The Grand Lodge of Louisiana and its federated lodges plotted
revolution in Mexico, and the Scottish lodges entered Mexico in
1813 for the express purpose of introducing the Constitution of
Cadiz, a revolutionary statement of governing principles which
contained numerous anti-ecclesiastical provisions. 

Moreover, public officials in the United States were active in
pressing Masonry upon the Mexican people. New York Governor
Dewitt Clintan, in a letter, dated December 10, 1825, acting in
his Masonic role as General Grand High Priest of the Royal Arch
Masons in the United States, approved the request of Joel
Poinsett to establish a chapter of the Royal Arch in Mexico. The
letter further authorized Poinsett to establish other chapters of
that discipline in South America. Poinsett, at that time, was the
U.S. minister plenipotentiary to that country. 

In 1835, Stephen Austin met in New Orleans "with 35 prominent
members of the local Lodge of Freemasons, and planned the
campaign which liberated Texas from Mexican rule."

Also, the Grand Lodges of Louisiana and Pennsylvania were busy
chartering Masonic lodges in Mexico, and Poinsett used his
considerable influence to have the Grand Lodge of New York
charter the Grand Lodge of Mexico. The Mexican lodges virtually
became the ruling political party of Mexico in the early 19th
century. 

But it is a strange irony of history that, despite the growing
national awareness of Freemasonry's grave threat to
Judeo-Christian beliefs and values-and to government itself-the
American people allowed their attention to be diverted suddenly
by a deceptive concern for what was perceived as a greater and
more immediate menace: the Roman Catholic Church.

Before exploring that aspect of American history, it is important
to understand the underlying philosophy of the Masonic Fraternity
and the actions which flow from such belief.


2/THE MIND OF MASONRY

Earlier in this century, Father Hermann Gruber, S. J. , a
recognized authority on Freemasonry, carefully scrutinized the
Masonic Fraternity on the basis of its numerous publications and
reports. He found :

- The Masonic program coincides to an astonishing degree with the
program of the French Revolution of 1789. 

- The Craft fosters in its members, and through them in society
at large, the spirit of innovation. It furnishes in critical
times a shelter for conspiracy. 

- Freemasonry propagates principles which, logically developed,
are essentially revolutionary and serve as a basis for all kinds
of revolutionary movements. 

- The Scottish Rite system, which is propagated throughout the
world, "may be considered as the revolutionary type of French
Templar Masonry, fighting for the natural rights of man against
religious and political despotism symbolized by the papal tiara
and the royal crown."

- Treason and rebellion against civil authority are deemed only
political crimes which do not affect the good standing of a
Mason, nor do they result in the imposition of Masonic
punishment. 

- Symbolic formulae and symbols are used so the work of Masonry
may not be hindered. The symbol of the Great Architect of the
Universe and of the Bible are of the utmost importance to
Masonry, since symbols are explained and accepted by each Mason
according to his own understanding. The official organ of Italian
Masonry emphasized that the Grand Architect may represent the
revolutionary God of Mazzini, the Satan of Carducci, God as the
fountain of love, or Satan the genius of the good, not of the
bad. In reality, Italian Masonry, in these interpretations,
adores the principle of Revolution. 

The ultimate aim of the Craft, Fr. Gruber said, is the overthrow
of all spiritual and political "tyranny" and class privileges, so
that there will be established a universal social republic in
which will reign the greatest possible individual liberty and
sociai and economic equality. 

To accomplish their goal, Masons believe the following is
necessary :

- 1. The destruction of all social influence by the Church and
religion generally, either by open persecution or by so-called
separation of Church and State.

- 2. To laicize or secularize all public and private life and,
above all, popular education.

- 3. To systematically develop freedom of thought and conscience
in school children, and protect them, so far as possible, against
all disturbing influences of the Church, and even their own
parents-by compulsion if necessary. 

Fr. Gruber's study was written in 1913, but it is curiously
evident that much of the Masonic program he outlined became
manifest to the general public during the three decades
Freemasons dominated the U.S. Supreme Court.

Certainly, the high bench has been militant in insisting that the
First Amendment mandates a scrupulous "separation of Church and
States." In that connection, the Court has said repeatedly that
governmental funds can be provided only for education and related
activities which are completely sectarian.

Surely, the Justices' approval for dispensing contraceptives to
children without parental consent, and authorizing them to have
abortions without the same consent, parallels Fr. Gruber's third
point immediately above.

Of course, some may wish to dismiss the Jesuit's catalogue of
Masonic chicanery as the views of an obedient priest written to
affirm earlier findings of Popes, historians, and legislative
investigating committees influenced by Christian values.

But the priest's analysis of the Craft cannot be cavalierly
ignored, particularly in view of the unexpected tribute paid him
by a prominent Masonic historian, Ossian Lang, in a report to the
Grand Lodge of New York. Lang said: "A fine example of how the
analytic mind of a scholarly non-Mason may discern the truth, may
be found in the excellent article on Freemasonry contained in The
Catholic Encyclopedia. The author of that article comes nearer to
interpreting the history correctly of Freemasonry . . . than any
Masonic writer whose publications have appearded in the English
language. . . " 

The View From The Lodge

Actually, Fr. Gruber's study, as well as the findings of Popes,
historians and legislative committees, have been largely
confirmed by members of the Craft itself. The fact is, a perusal
of sixty years of writings in the authoritative New Age magazine
leaves no doubt that Fr. Gruber and others of unimpeachable
veracity have clearly explained the reality of the Masonic
conspiracy to destroy Christian civilization. 

A review of nearly two-thirds of a century of the official
monthly journal of the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry of the
Southern Jurisdiction-the rite to which so many Presidents of the
United States, Justices of the Supreme Court and Members of
Congress adhered-leaves one impressed by the consistent emphasis
writers have given over the years to Albert Pike's Morals and
Dogma, a book written in 1871 as a series of lectures, "specially
intended to be read and studied by the Brethren of that obedience
in connection with the Rituals and of the Degrees. . . ." 

Pike's 861-page tome is described as "the basis for Masonic
philosophy," and is given to each initiate into the Fourth
Degree. Moreover, the book has been viewed by the Brethren as "a
secret book . . . not for publication. In case a mason dies or
otherwise leaves the Council, the book should be returned to the
Supreme Council or else destroyed."

Certainly, such statements serve to convince the reader that
Pike's book is a document of the highest importance to Scottish
Rite Freemasonry. lndeed, it appears to be the very mind of
Masonry. 

The Introduction to the work, says the author was "about equally
author and compiler; since he has extrackd quite half its
contents" from others. Moreover, it is explained that Pike
changed and remolded sentences of others, and added his own words
and phrases to the statements of writers in order to "use them as
if they were his own. . . ." 

The official historian of the Scottish Rite of the Southern
Jurisdiction, Clarles Lobinger, said Pike's book "swarms with
citations from Eliphas Levi," author of Dogme et Rituel, and that
Morals and Dogma "is shown to be literal and verbatim extractions
from those of the French Magus."

Arthur Waite, a Masonic authority on, and translator of, Levi's
works, has written:

"No person who is acquainted with Morals and Dogma can fail to
trace the hand of the occultist therein and it is to be
especially observed that, passing from grade to grade in the
direction of the highest, this institution [Freemasonry] becomes
more and more Kabbalistic."

Another Masonic writer insisted that reading Pike's work makes
one feel "he is contacting one of the greatest minds," and that
some day Pike will be recognized "as one of the greatest
religious teachers and reformers of history. . . "

Another author, writing in the same publication, recognized
Pike's book to be "tedious reading and even difficult to
understand." He suggested that the volume be read slowly over a
three-year period. 

Continuing, the latter writer said the book is "a summation of
those plilosophic and religious truths which are presented so
graphically in the [degree] work," and he urged the study of
Gnosticism and the Kabalah as collateral reading. 

So it is made clear that Freemasonry is not fundamentally a
fraternal insurance organization. It is an occult religion of
Kabbalistic Gnosticsm, and Pike's book is the basic source
document for brainwashing men in all degrees of Scottish Rite
Masonry.

Pike's Morals and Dogma

Scottish Rite Masonry's Grand Philosopher and former Grand
Commander wrote that the people, as a mass, are a "blind force,"
which must be "economized and managed" in order to attack
"superstitions, despotism and prejudice." And once the people are
organized and guided by "a brain and a law," and motivated by
Truth and Love, "the great revolution prepared for by the ages
will begin to march."

He said the force of the people becomes exhausted by prolonglng
"things long since dead; in governing mankind by embalming old,
dead tyrannies of Faith; restoring dilapidaded dogmas; re-gilding
faded, worm-eaten shrines; whitening and rouging ancient and
barren superstitions . . . perpetuating superannuated
institutions; enforcing the worship of symbols as the actual
means of salvation; and tying the dead corpse of the Past . . .
with the living present." 

"Pike compared the unorganized mass of people to a "Rough Ashlar"
[building stone] , and the organized and direct masses as a
Perfect Ashlar." It is a concept that had been first enunciated
by Adam Weishaupt to guide his Bavarian Illuminati, as was noted
earlier in the preceding pages of the book the reader is now
pursuing. 

The Masonic leader identified Masonry with the Ancient Mysteries
and star worship. The sun, moon and Master of the Lodge, he said,
are the three sublime lights of Masonry. He characterized the Sun
as the ancient symbol of the life-giving and generative power of
the Deity. The Moon symbolizes the passive capacity of nature to
produce (that is, the female of the species). The Master of Life
"was" [emphasis added] the Supreme Deity, above both and
manifested through both.

The Sun represents actual light, pours its fecunding rays upon
the Moon, and both shed their light upon their offspring, the
Blazing Star of Horus. The three form a great equilateral
triangle in the center of which is the monific letter of the
Kabbalah, by which creation is said to have been affected. 

In addition to exciting interest among neophyte Masons in pagan
religions (which had been almost abandoned with the triumph of
Christianity in the Fourth Century, A.D.), Pike's book also
presents Masonry as an organization which thrives on tension,
conflict and revolution-a struggle apparently directed toward
what Pike called "the great revolution prepared for by the ages,"
which would usher in the "universal social republic," mentioned
by Fr. Gruber.  

Lectures based on Pike's philosophy should immediately impress
perceptive Masons that the tension, conflict and revolution
referred to is the age-old pagan conflict with Christianity
particularly the Roman Catholic Church. The alternating black and
white squares on the Lodge floor Pike noted, serve to remind all
Masons of that constant conflict. Those alternating blocks
symbolize, he said, the "warfare of Michael and Satan; between
light and darkness; freedom and despotism ; religious liberty and
the arbitrary dogmas of a Church that thinks for its votaries,
and whose, Pontiff claims to be infallible, and the decretals of
its Councils to constitute gospel." Freemasonry, Pike said, owes
its "success to opposition."

Pike made it abundantly evident that Masonry has nothing to do
with Old and New Testament religious values. The Craft, he
insisted, is the successor of the Ancient Mysteries, and teaches
and preserves the cardinal tenets of the old primitive faith. AII
old religions "have died away and old faiths faded into
oblivion;" but Masonry survives "teaching the same old truths as
the Essenes taught and as John the Baptist preached in the
desert."

Masonry's "same old truths," were gathered "from the ZendAvesta
and the Vedos, from Plato and Pythagoras, from India, Persia,
Phonecia, Greece, Egypt and the Holy Books of the Jews . . .
These doctrines are the religion and philosophy of Masonry."
Obviously, Masonic philosophy makes no room for Christian truths,
ethics and values. 

Elaborating on Masonic philosophy, Pike sald that while Christian
Masons may believe the Divine Word became Man, others believe the
same thing happened long before to Mithra and Osiris. Therefore,
Christians should not object if others see in the Word of St.
John what actualiy is the Logos of Plato or the Unuttered Thought
of the first emanation of light or the Perfect Reason. "We do not
admit that the Messiah was born in Bethlehem."

The "truths" propagated by Masonry, Pike wrote, are based upon
Jewish mystical lore known as Kabbalistic Gnosticism. which was
passed to Masonry through the Knights Templar.

Explaining, Pike said there existed at the time of the Templars a
sect of "Johannite Christians, who claimed to be the only true
initiates into the real mysteries" of the religion of Christ.
Adopting in part the Jewish traditions and tales of the Talmud,
they said facts recounted in the Gospels "are but allegories." 

The Knights Templar, he continued, were from the very beginning
"devoted to . . . opposition to the tiara of Rome and the crown
of its Chiefs. . . "

The object of the Templars, he said, was to acquire influence and
wealth, then to "intrigue and at need fight to establish the
Johannite or Gnostic and Kabbalistic dogma. . . "

Again identifying Freemasonry with the Knights Templar, Pike
declared: "The Papacy and rival monarchies . . . are sold and
bought in these days, become corrupt, and tomorrow, perhaps, will
destroy each other. All that will become the heritage of the
Temple: the World will soon come to us for its Sovereigns and
Pontiffs. We shall constitute the equilibrium of the universe,
and be rulers over the masters of the world."

He said the Templars, like other secret societies, had two
doctrines: One was concealed and reserved for the Masters, which
was Johannism; the other, publicly practiced, was Roman Catholic.
Thus, Freemasonry, he said, "vulgarly imagined to have begun with
the Dionysian Architects or German Stone-workers, adopted St.
John the Evangelist as one of its patrons, associating with him
in order not to arouse the suspicion of Rome . . . [and] thus
covertly proclaiming itself the child of the Kabbalah and
Essenism together."

The Johannism of the Adepts, he added, "was the Kabbalah of the
earlier Gnostics."

Referring to the trial of the Templars, (which lasted from 1307
to 1314, and involved charges that Templars denied Christ was
God, abjured other basic Catholic beliefs, including the
Sacraments, spat and urinated upon the Crucifix , and regularly
engaged in homosexuality and other obscene acts), Pike said: Pope
Clement V and Philip the Fair [of France] could not fully explain
to the people at large "the conspiracy of the Templars against
the Thrones and the Tiara. To do so would propagate the religion
of Isis."

Jacques De Molay, Grand Master of the Knights Templar was
executed in 1314. However, before he died, according to Pike, he
instituted what came to be called the occult Hermetic or Scottish
Masonry, the Lodges of which were established in four
metropolitan areas , Naples, Edinburg, Stockholm, and Paris.
These Lodges, Pike asserted, were the initial Lodges of modern
Freemasonry. 

The former Grand Commander of the Scottish Rite also asserted
that the secret movers of the French Revolution had sworn upon
the tomb of De Molay to overthrow Throne and Altar. Then, when
King Louis XVI of France was executed [1793], "half the work was
done; thenceforward, the Army of the Temle was to direct all its
efforts against the Pope."

The Church and Christianity are clearly the major enemies of
Pike's Freemasonry. Christianity, he said, taught the doctrine of
Fraternity, but repudiated that of political equality because it
inculcated obedience to Caesar and to those lawfully in
authority. 

According to Pike, the Samaritan Jews, using Kabbalistic data,
characterized the "vulgar faith" by the figure of Thartac, a god
represented with a book, a clock, and the head of an ass. This
was because they believed Christianity was under the reign of
Thartac, since its adherents preferred "blind faith and utter
credulity . . . to intelligence and science. 

Concerning Heaven and Hell, Pike wrote: "The present is Masonry's
scene of action-man is on earth to live , to enjoy. He is not in
this world to hanker after another.

The unseen can not hold a higher place in our affections than the
seen," he declared, and added: Only those "who have a deep
affection for this world will work for its amelioration. 

Ascetism, said Pike, is "unnattural" and "moribund." Those whose
affections are transferred to Heaven, easily acquiesce in the
miseries of earth. "Those given most decidedly to spirital
contemplation, and make religion rule their life are most
apathetic toward improving this world's systems. They are
conservators of evil and hostile to political and social reform."

The writings of the Apostoles, Pike said, were only "articles of
the vulgar faith." The real mysteries of knowledge handed down
from generation to generation by superior minds were the
teachings of the Gnostics . . . and in them [we find] some of the
ideas that form part of Masonry."

To Pike, Christ was not unique. The fundamental teachings
concerning Jesus are commonly believed of Krishna, the Hindu
Redeemer, he said. Born of a virgin, performing miracles, raising
people from the dead. Krishna descended into Hell, rose again,
ascended into Heaven, charged his disciples to teach doctrines
and gave them a gift of miracles. 

Speaking of the Catholic Church, Pike wrote: "By what right . . .
does the savage, merciless, persecuting animal endeavor to delude
itself that it is not an animal?" 

In his commentary on the Council of Kadosh, Pike inferentially
referred to the Holy Eucharist, and said:

The chief symbol of man's ultimate redemption is the fraternal
supper of bread and wine. This fraternal meal teaches among other
things "that many thousands who died before us might claim to be
joint owners with ourselves of the particles that compose our
mortal bodies, for matter ever forms new combinations: and the
bodies of the ancient dead, the Patriarchs before and since the
mood, the Kings and common people of all ages, resolved into
their constituent elements, are carried upon the wind over all
continents, and continually enter into and form part of the
habitations of new souls creating new bonds of sympathy and
brotherhood between each man that lives and all his race.

"And thus the bread we eat, and the wine we drink tonight may
enter into and form part of us the identical particles of matter
that once formed parts of the material bodies called Moses,
Confucius, Plato, Socrates, or Jesus of Nazareth. In the truest
sense we eat and drink the bodies of the dead...."

Over and over again, Morals and Dogma (MAD) emphasizes that
Freemasonry is a religion based on the occult Jewish philosophy
found in the Kabbalah.

The key to the true meaning of the symbols within the Temple is
found in the occult philosophy of the Kabbalah, Pike said, and
subsequently asserted that Masonry owes all its symbols and
secrets to the Kabbalah. 

"It is the province of Masonry to teach all truths, not moral
truth alone, but political and philosophical, and even religious
truth," he said. Masonry, he insisted is "the universal
morality."

And again: "The religious faith . . . taught by Masonry is
indispensable to the attainment of the great ends of life. . . "
Pike proclaimed that "every Masonic Lodge is a temple of
religion; and its teachings are instruction in religion. . . " 

The Degree Rose Cross teaches "the ultimate defeat and extinction
of evil and wrong and sorrow by a Redeemer or Messiah yet to
come, if he has not already appeared."

Earlier commentators on Masonry have contended that Masonry is a
State within the State. Morals and Dogma gives credence to that
view by insisting that Masonry determines whether heads of State
should stay in power.

 e 
"Edicts by a despotic power contrary to the Law of God or the
Great Law" of Nature, destructive of the inherent rights of man,
and violative of the right of free thought, free speech, free
conscience warrant lawful rebellion, he said And, he noted,
"resistance to power usurped is not merely a duty which man owes
to himself and his neighbor, but a duty which he owes to his
God.: 

If rulers have the Divine Right to govern, the true Masonic
initiate will cheerfully obey, said Pike. 

The problem faced by both rulers and people is to know who has a
"Divine Right" to govern; and how much freedom is permitted for
speech and conscience in a state before rebellion is warranted.
Morals and Dogma strongly indicates that Masonry alone will make
such determinations.

Pike also makes clear that those in the lower degrees of Masonry
are "intentionally misled by false interpretions" of the symbols
of the Craft. "It is not intended," he said that Masons in the
Blue Degrees (the first three degrees) "shall understand them;
but it is intended that [they] shall imagine" they do. The true
explanations of the symbols are "reserved for the Adepts, the
Princes of Masonry," he said. 

Those are some highlights from a book that has been extolled in
the New Age magazine for over 60 years as the plilosophic
foundation upon which Scottish Rite Freemasonry stands. While
many members of the Fraternity have found the book turgid and
tedious, obviously many others look upon it as a great source of
wisdom. In January, 1950, the Scottish Rite Committee on
Publications reminded members of the Craft that they were
"expected to be leaders and teachers of the people," and that the
basic philosophy undergirding their efforts must be Morals and
Dogma.

It can be little doubted that Pike had the pulse of Masonry. And
long prior to publication of his opus, the Supreme Council of the
Scottish Rite of the Southern Jurisdiction issued a circular
which asserted: "Above the idea of country is the idea of
humanity."

A Mason has written that Masonry exists the world over "and is
susceptible of forming, at any moment, with its various
Masonries, a homogenous bloc, or mass, pursuing a common ideal.
That ideal is the emancipation of Humanity."

One well-informed non-Masonic student of the Craft said that to
promote the Masonic concept of "the welfare of humanity" and
elimination of "ignorance and prejudice" meant in practical terms
Masonic attacks on altar and throne. 

The same source also said the true purpose of Freemasonry is "the
fall of all dogmas and the ruin of all churches."

The Grand Commander of Scottish Rite Masonry of the Southern
Jurdisdiction revealed that Manuel Quezon, first President of the
Philippines Senate and later the first President of the
Philippine Commonwealth, declined to accept the "rank and
dignity"  of the 33rd degree of Freemasonry, because he "feared,
some way, sometime, that there might be some obligation in
accepting the honor which would be in conflict with his
allegiance to the Philippines."

Albert Pike

The only monument to a Confederate general in the nation's
capital stands on public property between the U.S. Department of
Labor Building and the city's Municipal Building on D Street,
N.W., between Third and Fourth Streets. It is a statue of Albert
Pike, the grand philosopher of Scottish Rite Masonry, who was
indicted for treason for his activities during the Civil War.  

Clad in a frock coat and weskit, wearing shoulder-length hair,
the bewhiskered Pike is depicted holding in his left hand a
volume of Morals and Dogma, his great Masonic treatise.

Chiseled into the statue's pedestal are words which purport to
describe the man's abilities; poet, author, jurist, orator,
philosopher, philanthropist, scholar and soldier. The sculpture
gives no indication that Pike, as a Confederate general, was
commander of a band of Indians who scalped and killed a number of
Union soldiers during the Battle of Pea Ridge (Ark.). 

Military records show that Indians at the Battle of Pea Ridge
conducted warfare with "barbarity." Adjutant John W. Noble of the
Third Iowa Regiment said: " . . from personal inspection . . . I
discovered that eight of the men . . . had been scalped." 


Adjutant Noble added that the bodies had been exhumed and many
showed "unmistakable evidence" of having been "murdered after
they were wounded." 

First sergeant Daniel Bradbury swore he was present at the Battle
on March 7, 1862 and saw Indians "doing as they pleased." The
next day, he saw about 3,000 Indians "marching in good order
under the command of Albert Pike."

In a letter, dated March 21, 1862, Pike was admonished by D.H.
Maury, assistant Adjutant General of the Trans-Mississippi
District "to restrain [Indians under his command] from committing
any barbarities upon the wounded prisoners, or dead who may fall
into their hands."

The New York Times reported that Pike had "seduced" the Indians
into war paint."

Pike was born in Massachusetts in 1890, but moved to Arkansas as
a young man where he became president of the State Council of the
anti-Catholic American Party.

In 1861, Pike wrote a pamphlet "State or Province, Bond or Free,"
addressed to the people of Arkansas following Abraham Lincoln's
election to the Presidency of the United States, but prior to his
inauguration. In the pamphlet, Pike said the border States should
at once "unite with the states that have seceded and are yet to
secede, meet them in convention, and aid in framing a
Constitution and setting on foot a Government."

Then, he continued, there will no longer be a few seceded States,
"but a new and powerful confederacy, to attempt to coerce which
would be a simple fatuity. A war against it would be too
expensive a luxury for the North to indulge in, and would,
moreover, defeat its own purpose." 

Pike served as Commissioner to the Indians West of Arkansas in
the Confederate States of America, and between July 10 and
October 7, 1861 concluded Treaties of Friendship and Alliance
with seven Indian nations on behalf of the Confederacy. The
treaties gave certain tribes the unqualified right of admission
as a State of the Confederacy and allowed each tribe a delegate
in the Confederate Congress. However, President Jefferson Davis
of the Confederacy urged that aspect of the treaties be deleted.

Subsequently, the Comanchees were "greatly astonished on being
informed that they had made a treaty with enemies of the
Government of their Great Father in Washington."

That history of Albert Pike is rarely, if ever, discussed by
Masons. He remains to them "an outstanding man," a "great man, .
. . a truly universal and creative genius, . . . an inexhaustible
mine of inspiration, [and] a mental and spiritual giant."

Other Integral Characteristics of Masonry

There are other distasteful characteristics integral to Masonry
which are little noted, but deserve mention.

Prejudice

Masonry's "Landmarks," have been described by a Craftsman as
"those peculiar marks of distinction by which we are separated
from the profane world, and by which we are enabled to designate
our inheritance as the `Sons of light.' These landmarks are
"unrepealable" and "can suffer no change."

Among such inflexible laws of Masonry is Landmark No. 18, which
lists qualifications for membership in the Craft. That Landmark
says no man can be a Freemason unless he is "unmutilated" and
"free-born." It is further stipulated that neither women, slaves,
nor one born in slavery, are qualified for initiation into the
rites of the Masonic Fraternity. 

In that connection, it is interesting to note that Albert Pike,
writing of the Aryans who peopled the earth about 10,000 years
ago, said:

"They were white men, . . . the superior race in intellect, in
manliness, the governing race of the world, the conquering race
of all other nations."

Continuing, he asserted: "The single fact that we owe not one
single truth, not one idea in philosophy or religion to the
Semitic race is, of itself, ample reward for years of study, and
it is a fact indisputable, if I read the Veda and Zend Avesta
alright."

The Veda is the collection of sacred writings of the Aryans who
invaded Northern India in 1500 B.C. The Zend Avesta is a
compilation of the sacred writings and commentary thereon of the
Zoroastrian religion of ancient Persia.

In his Lectures on the Arya, Pike noted the Yima (first of all
men created, and the first with whom Ahru Mazda conversed)
ultimataly lived among people who had perfect stature and "no
other marks which are the token of Anra-Mainyus, the Evil
Principle, which he has made among men."

Regarding the "other marks," Pike said:

"By which it appears that deformity was considered as a mark put
on man by the Evil One; and that Yima selected for his colonists
only those in whom there was no physical defect."

Perhaps that Zoroastrian view is responsible for Masons
permitting only the "unmutilated" to "colonize" lodges of the
Craft, as required by the Fraternity's Landmark 18.
Another example of Masonic prejudice was evidenced in a 1928 New
Age review of a book, Reforging America by Dr. Lothrop Stoddard.
The reviewer said the book's author "clearly demonstrates the
necessity of America retaining its racial purity." The reviewer
added: "[Tlhe influence of Masonry upon the author's philosophy
is evident throughout the volume."

Another article in the official journal of the Scottish Rite
concerned the Indians of Mexico and purported to explain why so
many revolutions have occurred in that country. The article said:

"The Indian, as such, is superstitious, immobile, a silhouette of
stone. He breeds rapidly and would completely overrun the country
and dominate by sheer force of numbers were it not for the fact
that during each `revolution' hundreds of Indians are killed or
die from disease.

"The Indian of today in Mexico is the `leftover', still native
and Christian, God-fearing, a superstitious dominated being." [He
is part of a structure of ignorance, slavery and servitude . . .
under the domination of the Church, whose sole idea was to
maintain this servitude and ignorance."

Commenting on the fact that Negro Masons have their own exclusive
black Masonic organization, Grand Commander John Cowles explained
that "most of the so-called colored Grand Lodges" trace their
history to Prince Hall, a Negro who claimed that he was initiated
in an English Army Lodge in Boston. Then the Grand Commander
noted that "all regular Grand Lodges in the United States do not
recognize any colored or Negro Masonry." 

Cowles addressed the same subject in 1947, but said it is not
"because of their color" that blacks are not allowed into the
lodges of "regular" Masonry. Rather, it is "the general
characteristics of the race as it exists in this country and the
apparent incompatible social reaction of the two races."

The Grand Commander called attention to a photostatic copy of a
joint letter in the files of the Supreme Council signed by the
Grand Secretary of the Grand Lodge of Massachusetts and the
Deputy of the Supreme Council of the Scottish Rite of the
Northern Jurisdiction in Massachusetts, dated February 7, 1925,
which allegedly says a black member was expelled from Freemasonry
"on the technical ground that he had falsified as to the place of
his birth; that . . . [he] had claimed to be an Indian, and that
the Grand Lodge had evidence 'amply sufficient to prove that he
was not an Indian at all, but a Negro, and other things to his
discredit.'" 

Cowles said that on one side of the photostatic copy of the
Massachusetts Grand Secretary's letter appears the statement:
"The Masons could not afford to admit that they had initiated a
Negro, so he was expelled upon the technical ground of fraud in
naming his birthplace." 

In 1976 , a Masonic afflliate organization for girls, the
International Order of the Rainbow, suspended all Iowa chapters
of the group because one local chapter endorsed membership of a
12-year-old black girl.

According to press reports, Michelle Palmer, whose father is
white and mother is black, had been invited to join the Rainbow
chapter in Indianola, Iowa, and was approved by the local
assembly in October of that year. However, officials at the
Rainbow's international headquarters at McAlester, Oklahoma ruled
that all 136 Rainbow assemblies in Iowa must disband by the end
of the year because they did not follow "rules and regulations."

It was explained that the organization took disciplinary action
on the basis of an "unwritten law" which excludes blacks from
membership. 

Subsequently, it was reported that a majority of the nation's 61
Rainbow assemblies voted to drop the so-called "unwritten law"
which banned Negro girls from Rainbow. 

This Masonic racism persists to this day in both "regular"
Masonry and Prince Hall Masonry, and the issue is rarely
questioned in nominations to the judiciary or to other positions
in government which require the strictest sense of fairness.

In 1979, The Washington Star carried an article by Robert Pear,
the lead paragraph of which read: "Should a federal judge belong
to a social club that excludes blacks-or women?

The article went on to note that the question occurred with
"embarrassing frequency" in connection with President Jimmy
Carter's nominees for federal judgeships, because so many of the
candidates belong to racially exclusive "social clubs, eating
clubs or other fraternal organizations.

Pear wrote: "The issue of white-only private clubs haunted
Attorney General Griffin B. Bell at his confirmation hearings in
1977. He agreed to resign from the Piedmont Driving Club and the
Capital City Club in Atlanta because, he said, `the attorney
general is so symbolic of equal justice under the law.'" 

Of course, even more the symbols of equal justice are the
Justices of the Supreme Court of the United States.

The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People
[NAACP] and the National Women's Political Caucus [NWPC], Pear
observed in his Star article, "say judges should not belong to
any clubs that discriminate on the basis of race, sex, religion
or national origin."

Interestingly enough, On May 6, 1983, Vice President George Bush
addressed the all-black Prince Hall Grand Masters of Masons, "at
the invitation of Benjamin Hooks, president of the NAACP, and a
Grand Mason secretary from Tennessee. 

Adding insult to injury, the State Supreme Court of New Jersey
decided in 1986 that a low-level State-court employee, must step
down as an officer of a local NAACP chapter in order to avoid the
appearance of judicial involvement in political disputes.

The State Supreme Court also ordered the Monmouth County Superior
Court attendant in question to resign from a taxpayers' group , a
local mental-health board and four other groups. 

Earlier, the Maryland Senate enacted legislation to deny a tax
exemption to Burning Tree Country Club because it discriminates
against women. The amendment exempted the Masons, the Elks and
the Moose, because they were considered "charitable
organizations." 

Atheism

A careful reading of Masonic literature will make it evident that
the Craft rejects God of the Scriptures.

The basic Masonic law requires initiates never be "a stupid
atheist." But a knowledgeable Mason observed: "Let us not be
deceived. All atheists are not stupid."

Pike, writing of atheism, said Nature is "self-originated, or
always was and had been the cause of its own existence."

The test as to belief in God, he asserted, is whether the
qualities exist, "regardless of what name is given these
qualities."

Real atheism, he said, "is the denial of existance of any God, of
the actuality of all possible ideas of God. It denies that there
is any Mind, Intelligence or Ens that is the cause and Providence
of the Universe. . . "

Joseph Fort Newton, one of the Fraternity's august theologians,
declared: "To enter our Lodges a man must confess his faith in
Godthough he is not required definitely to define in what terms
he thinks of God..."

Newton explained Masonic faith as follows: "Faith in the Universe
as friendly to fraternal enterprise . . . [I]t affims . . . that
man was made for man."

Another Masonic writer said: "man is divine, and his divinity is
within himself." And yet another New Age writer declared: "When
we talk to God we are taking to ourselves, for God and Man are
one and the same through the ties of Love. . . "


Teacher of the World's Children

A previously noted quotation by Albert Pike, is important to
recall. He said: "It is the province of Masonry to teach all
truths, not moral truth alone, but political and philosophical,
and even religious truth."

Indeed, shaping the minds of the world's youth has been an
unremitting major activity of the Masonic Fraternity.

Historian Mildred Headings said the true purpose pursued by
French Masons is "the fall of all dogmas and the ruin of all
churches." She also noted that the Fraternity successfully
campaigned in France to promote universal obligatory lay
education and the use of school texts with Masonic values. 

And what happened in France, has happened largely in America.
In 1915, the Scottish Rite urged that graduates of American
public schools be given "preference in every appointment to
public office."

In 1920, during a special session held at Colorado Springs,
Colorado, the Supreme Council of the Scottish Rite drew up a
comprehensive education plan for the youth of the country. The
plan called for sending all children through public schools for a
certain number of years, and recommended the careful selection of
school trustees and teachers, as well as supervisors of school
textbooks and libraries in order to exclude "sectarian
propaganda." 

The Masonic plan also urged the establishment of "a national
department of public education headed by a secretary appointed as
a member of the President's Cabinet."

Almost immediately, the Craft's various journals propagandized in
favor of the proposals which were generally embodied in
legislation that through the 1920s and 30s was known as the
Smith-Towner Bill, the Towner-Sterling Bill, and the
Sterling-Reed Bill, reflecting the names of the Representatives
and Senators who introduced the legislation. 

In 1922, the State of Oregon, with Help of the Supreme Council
and the Imperial Council of the Nobles of the Mystic Shrine [the
group so beloved for its children's hospitals and circus
presentations], was successful in lobbying for the passage of
legislation which outlawed Catholic and other parochial schools
in the State. 

The law was declared unconstitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court
in 1925, in Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 268 U.S. 510.

The "the apostle of free, public schools," Horace Mann, was a
Freemason, and, according to his wife, was an enthusiastic
advocate of the philosophy of religion, a philosophy which was
"scientific, humanitarian, ethical, [and] naturalistic. . . "
Mann believed in "character education without `creeds,' and in
phrenology as a basis for `scientific education.'" He held that
"natural religion stands . . . preeminent over revealed religion
. . ."

In 1930, a Masonic writer said: "In America, public education is
the right and duty of the state . . . For the time may come . . .
when by unchecked operation of biologic law, and other
considerations, Catholics will be a majority in these United
States . . " 

Four years later, another New Age contributor boldly proclaimed:
"The practical object of Masonry is the moral, intellectual and
spiritual improvement of the individual and society."

But by 1935, the Masonic efforts to totally dominate the minds of
American children had not come to fruition because, as a New Age
editorial noted, eight of the 15 members of the House Committee
on Education were Roman Catholics. That situation prompted the
Scottish Rite journal to say; "Hence, so long as this condition
exists in Congress there will be little opportunity for creating
a Department of Education. 

It is now apparent, that if that handful of Catholic members of
the House Education Committee had not prevailed, and subsequently
been succeeded by equally steadfast Catholic Congressmen and
Senators into the very early 1960s, every public school child
(including this writer) might have been propagandized with
naturalism as the established national religion, long before the
Masonically-dominated Supreme Court effectively imposed that
curriculum on the nation's public school system when it outlawed
Bible reading and school prayers in 1962 and 1963.

If the views of one Masonic writer are reasonably representative
of the mind of Masonry, which they undoubtedly are, the
likelihood of a Masonically-imposed naturalism on America's
school children was clearly a possibility before mid-20th
Century. The writer declared:

"The dramatic presentation of the 32nd degree of the Scottish
Rite expresses a code of ethics which is essentially natural
religion. . . . In this support of natural religion, Scottish
Rite masonry presents an excellent example of what might be
followed in our public schools . . . There can be no well-founded
objection to the presentation of natural religion." 

Another recommendation for public school children was that they
should be taught the "balance between good and evil." Nine years
later, the same theme was advanced in an editorial which called
for strengthening "education for life . . . the knowledge of good
and evil."

The official organ of the Scottish Rite of the Southern
Jurisdiction published an article in 1959 which said every Mason
becomes a teacher of "Masonic philosophy to the community," and
the Craft is "the missionary of the new order-a Liberal order . .
. in which Masons become high priests."

The article proclaimed that this "Masonic philosophy" which has
brought forth a "New Order" had become a reality by "the
establishment of the public school system, financed by the State,
for the combined purpose of technological and sociological
education of the mass of humanity, beginning at an early age in
childhood."

At the same time, another Craftsman asserted that the Fraternity
"provided the major obstacle" to the growth of religious-oriented
education. 

In 1968, a 33rd Degree Mason said: "The keynote of Masonic
religious thinking is naturalism which sees all life and thought
as ever developing and evolutionary . . ." 

The Bible, said Brother Leonard Wenz, "is not today what it once
was." Current higher criticism, he observed, has "made obsolete
the idea that the Bibie is a unique revelation of supernatural
truth." 

While the Court has outlawed public recitation of the Bible as a
religious work in public schools, the "Americanism" program of
the Scottish Rite has mandated that members of the Fraternity
disseminate Masonic materials in public schools. And the brethren
take that role seriously.

In 1959, the Grand Commander said Franklin W. Patterson, 33rd
Degree, secretary of the Scottish Rite Lodge at Baker, Oregon,
succeeded in persuading the principal of the local high school to
use Masonic-oriented texts in the local public schools.  Also,
the Scottish Rite bodies of Alexandria, Virginia "placed the New
Age magazine in all public school libraries within their
jurisdiction." 

In 1964, Grand Commander Luther A. Smith reported that Masonic
booklets had been "distributed by sets to every room in every
school" in the Charlotte County, North Carolina public school
system. The Superintendent of Schools for that jurisdiction made
the Masonic propaganda "required reading."

In 1965, Major General Herman Nickerson, 33rd Degree, Commander
of the U.S. Marine Corps faciiity at Camp Lejune, N.C., was
commended by the Supreme Council for introducing the Supreme
Council's books on "Americanism" into the schools under his
command attended by children of Marine Corps personnel. In 1966,
General Nickerson received an award from the Freedoms Foundation
at Valley Forge, PA., for "his citizenship program at Camp
Lejune. . . ."

Subsequently, General Nickerson became Director of Personnel for
the U. S. Marine Corps and on May 8, 1968 was the principal
speaker when 17 West Point cadets "were obligated" as "soldier
Masons," one month prior to being commissioned second lieutenants
"to carry out our ideals in Viet Nam." 

George Washington University in the nation's capital has long had
close ties to Freemasonry, and has been the recipient of its
largess. Not only did it receive $1 million from the Masons in
the 1920s, it has received additional funds from the Masonic
International "High Twelve Clubs," the Masons of Louisiana, the
National League of Masonic Clubs, and the Knights Templar 

When George Washington University restructured its Masonic funded
School of Government in 1966, it consolidated the Department of
Government and Business and existing programs "at the U.S. Air
Force Command and Staff School, Maxwell Air Force Base in
Alabama, and the Industrial College of the Armed Forces (ICAF) at
Ft. McNair, Washington, D.C."

The consolidation was effected only "after a conference was held
with Grand Commander [Luther] Smith and his approval obtained."


The ICAF is the highest and most prestigious of all federal
educational institutions.

Moreover, Masonic influence is threaded through most college
fraternities, and their rituals were written and insignia
designated by Masons. However, only four college fraternities
were founded exclusively for Masons: Acacia, founded at the
University of Michigan in 1904; Square and Compass, founded at
Washington and Lee University in 1917; Sigma Mu Sigma, (Tri-State
College, in 1921); and the Order of the Golden Key, founded at
the University of Oklahoma in 1925.

In 1952, Square and Compass merged with Sigma Mu Sigma, "to
thoroughly indoctrinate the college men of America with the
traditions of our American Masonic heritage."


4/ THE CRAFT AND THE KLAN

By the early 20th Century, attacks on Catholics had waned, and
did not resume until shortly after Jews and Freemasons were
singled out as threats to the nation.

First, it was charged in Congressional testimony that Jews were
closely identified with Bolshevism and anarchism. Then, almost
simultaneously, history's most distorted plagiarism, "The
Protocols of the Elders of Zion," purported to reveal how Jews
and Freemasons were conspiring to overthrow Christian
Civilization as a prelude to joint world rule.

Prior to that bizarre imbroglio-which, it should be noted, never
came close to exciting the hatred and bloodshed reserved for
Catholics-the Church was gaining respect and adherents. Census
data demonstrated that it accounted for over one-third of all
religious denominations in the United States. 

In 1911 , President William Howard Taft remarked that membership
in the Roman Catholic Church is "assurance" of patriotic
citizenship. The following year, the President's sister-in-law,
Mrs. H.W. Taft, was received into the Catholic Church. 

The Klan Moves North

Three years later, Colonel William J. Simmons, an ardent admirer
of the Ku Klux Klan of 1866- 1869, under the leadership of
Confederate General Nathan Bedford Forrest, re-established the
Klan at Atlanta, Georgia in 1915, and called himself the Imperial
Wizard.

According to a handbill he issued in 1917, titled "The ABC of the
Knights of the Ku Klux Klan;" [available in the Rare Book
Division of the Library of Congress], the Klan advocated white
supremacy, and was open only to "native born American citizens
who believe in the tenets of the Christian religion:" That
viewpoint was strikingly similar to the philosophy of the
Know-Nothings and the APA of previous periods.

A year earlier, it was apparent that a resuscitated Know-Nothing
movement was taking nourishment in the North. The New YorK Times
reported that a "secret oath-bound anti-Catholic order" (which
refused to divulge its name) was operating in New York City as
part of a nation-wide group organized specifically to oppose
"political encroachments" by the Roman Catholic Church. The
group's spokesman, Rev. William Hess, Pastor of Trinity
Congregational Church, alleged that the Catholic Church intended
to make the United States a "Catholic" country, and planned to
"get control of the government."

Later that year, dissension arose in the organization's ranks and
resulted in the New York adjunct separating itself from the
national body. 

Although the group was extremely reticent about publicity, one of
its spokesman bragged to the Times that it had been sucessful in
efforts to defeat Martin H. Glen, candidate for Governor in the
Empire State in 1914, because "he represented the Jesuit element"
in American politics. 

In 1920, the Sons and Daughters of Washington, a group which bore
an uncanny resemblance to the unidentified 1916 anti-Catholic
organization, was formed in Brooklyn, New York to oppose Catholic
political activities. It was characterized in the press as "a
militant fighting organization for Protestantism,"

The august and powerful Times did not disagree with the goals of
the Sons and Daughters of Washington, but faulted the
organization for its egregious lack of tact. An editorial in that
newspaper said the Sons and Daughters "show none of the
discretion that characterized him whose name they have taken."

Hammering home the point, the Times said: "Only a minute fraction
of it [i.e., discretion] would have enabled them to see that the
war [World War I] is not yet remote enough to make attacks on the
Knights of Columbus more than the forlonest of hopes. Our
soldiers are under the impression that the Knights served them
certainly as well as did any other agency of relief and support,
and better than did several." 

Jews Attacked

But Catholics were not the sole targets of hatred. Jews were
singled out for attack during the period 1919-1921.

Opposition to Jews developed as pressure built up in the United
States to support a Zionist nation in Palestine for Jews who had
been displaced by the Russian Revolution and World War I. The
issue split the Jewish community itself.

Congressman Julius Kahn of California, for examle, objected to
President Woodrow Wison's endorsement of an independent Jewish
state in Palestine , principally, the Congressman said, because
it incites "the division of one's affiliation with the country in
which he lives," and creates "a divided allegiance." Kahn also
said he was opposed to Zionists because they "believe in the
foundation of a government which shall embrace both Church and
State."

At the same time, Rev. Dr. George S. Simons, who had been
Superintendent of the Methodist Episcopal Church in Russia and
Finland for the preceding 12 years, testified before a Senate
committee investigating Bolshevism in 1919, and charged that
chaotic conditions in Russia were due in large part to agitators
from the east side of New York City who flocked to Russia
immediately after the overthrow of the Czar.

The Methodist minister said that some of the New York people in
Russia held high positions in the Bolshevist government, and that
Bolshevists were responsible for wholesale murder of innocent
civilians, outraging of young girls, and official starving of all
who did not endorse Bolshevist teachings.

He identified those Bolshevists as "Yiddish agitators from the
New York east side," and "apostate Jews, men who deny their God,
and who have foresaken the religion and the teachings of their
fathers."

His information was, he said, that 265 members of the Bolshevist
Government "had come into Russia . . . from the east side of New
York."

Rev. Simons also testified that "a large percentage of the
Bolshevist agitators at work over here [the United States] are
apostate Jews."

Two days later, Louis Marshall, President of the American Jewish
Committee, testified before the Senate committee He confirmed
that some Bolshevists were apostats Jews, but complained that Rev
Simons' Statement was damaging to other Jews who oppose
Bolshevism. 

In New York, Jewish leaders complained that two Episcopal Church
clerics had charged that members of the Jewish race were in need
of Americanization and Christianization. It was alleged that Rev.
John L. Zacker told an Episcopal convention: "The Jews control
the world, and if Christianity is to convert the Jews, it must be
attempted at once."
Rev. Thomas Burgess, Secretary of Christian Americanization of
the Episcopal Church, replied that his Church's program was
directed toward all "foreign born," including the "large number
of Jews who have left the faith of their fathers." 

A little over one year later, Rabbis Joseph Silverman and Samuel
Schulman condenmed anti-Semitic attacks in various publications
in the United States which were based on "The Protocols of the
Wise Men of Zion." They said "The Protocols" allege that Jews and
Freemasons "are in a great conspiracy to achieve world mastery."
Among the publications cited by the Rabbis was auto magnate Henry
Ford's Dearborn Independent, which had been serializing "The
Protocols" for six months.

Dr. Silverman rightly pointed out that none of the publications
furnished any evidence that an international secret political
organization of Jews actually exists.

Continuing, he said anti-Semites "collect a few Jewish names,
like Karl Marx, Bela Kun, Herezl, Trotzky and others, and call a
few sentences of their writings, divorced from their contexts,"
to show that Jews "are individualists, Socialists, Bolsheviki,
Zionists and what not, who care only for the overthrow of all
Governments in order to establish their own."

But, he observed, such people ignore that fact that the Zionists,
Socialists and Bolsheviki, "who happen to carry Jewish names, are
only a handful in comparison to the great bulk of Jewish people
throughout the world who are not only not in sympathy with
Zionism , Socialism, Bolshevism, but who actually denounce these
attempts at separate forms of government."

The Rabbi declared that there never would be a Jewish nation or a
Jewish army or navy with which to dominate the world. "In no
nation of the world is there a Jewish vote," Dr. Silverman
asserted. 
Henry Ford was attacked repeatedly for his publication of "The
Protocols."  Editorializing against "The Protocols," the Times
said they were "about the strangest jumble of crazy ideas that
ever found its way into print." 

The editorial added that "The Protocols" are of "unknown origin
and accounted for only as having been put into the hands of the
Russian Nilus by an unknown lady who obtained them `in a
mysterious way...

The Conference of Jews issued a public statement on November 30 ,
1920 condenming the "Protocols," and characterized them as "a
mere recrudescence of medieval bigotry and stupidity."

Princess Catherine Radziwill, a Russian emigre writer who
specialized in Russian and European matters, said she had seen
the manuscript for the "Protocols" when it was being fabricated
in 1884 by General Orgewsky, head of the Third Section of Police
of the Russian State Department.

The General, she related, had sent agents to Paris to prepare the
fake documentation which would show that the Jews were
responsible for assassinating Alexander II, and "were planning a
general conspiracy to destroy all the monarchies of the earth."

Continuing, she said the Czar's agents "searched old books,
compiled citations from Jewish philosophers, and ransacked the
records of the French Revolution for abstracts of the most
inflammatory speeches."

As it turned out, the Princess's recollection appeared to be
accurate.

On May 8, 1920, there appeared in The Times (London) an article
"From  A Correspondent" which called attention to a book, The
Jewish Peril, Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion, by
Professor S. Nilus. The correspondent called for an investigation
of the book because it fostered "indiscriminate anti-Semitism . .
. rampant in Eastern Europe," and "growing in France, England and
America." 

Fifteen months later, The Times' Constantinople correspondent
reported that the "Protocols"-which purported to evidence a
JewishMasonic conspiracy to destroy Christian Civilization by a
universal revolution which would usher in Jewish world-rule-were
a plagiarism. The newspaper article clearly demonstrated that
Nilus's work was based largely on a book "Dialogue aux Enfers
entre Machiavel et Montesquieu ou la Politique de Machiavel au
XIX Siecle. [Dialogue in Hell between Machiavelli and
Montesquieu, on the Politics of Machiavelli in the XIX Century].

The book, published at Brussels, Belgium in 1865, was authored by
a person identified on the title page as "un Contemporain," but
actually was Maurice Joly, a Parisian lawyer and publicist, who
had been arrested by Napoleon III's police and sentenced to 18
months imprisonment. 

The Brussels book was "a very thinly-veiled attack on the
despotism of Napoleon III in the form of 26 dialogues divided
into four parts," and the "Protocols" attributed to Nilus follow
almost the identical order as the "Dialogues." of Joly. 

While the book by the Russian mystic Sergi Nilus was shown
conclusively to be a plagiarism, many people obviously insist on
continuing the controversy, as is evidenced by approximately 100
books concerning the "Protocols" (pro and con), in several
languages, listed in the card catalogue of the Library of
Congress.

New York World Exposes Klan Anti-Catholicism

Exposure of the "Protocols" forgery pretty well ended serious
antiSemitism, although there were occasional attacks on Jews in
such organs as The Searchlight, a Klan-influenced journal, which
lashed out at "Jewish agitators" who were plotting a race war to
destroy the Government, and to overthrow all the Gentile
governments of the world."

But the motherlode which provided the Klan's enormous membership
and great wealth was America's historic hatred of the Catholic
Church. This was first evidenced in a series of 21 articles which
began in the New York World on September 6, 1921, following
threemonths investigation of the Klan by that newspaper. The
series simultaneously appeared in 17 other major dailies
throughout the nation.

The first article in the series reported on the Klan's terrorism
in the South, largely against Negroes. The Klan was exposed for
having been involved in 21 tar and featherings; 25 beatings of
individuals; 2 strippings and maltreatment of white women; 3
killings; and 18 warnings to prospective victims of Klan wrath. 

The series also reproduced a copy of a bogus oath which the Klan
said was the actual oath taken by Fourth Degree members of the
Knight of Columbus. The bogus oath began:

"I _________, now in the presence of Almighty God, the Blessed
Virgin Mary, the Blessed St. John the Baptist, the Holy Apostles,
St. Peter and St. Paul, . . . and to you, my Ghostly Father, the
superior general of the Society of Jesus , . . . declare and
swear that His Holiness, the Pope . . . hath power to depose
heretical kings, princes, States, Commonwealths and Governments,
and they may be safely destroyed. . . :'

The fabricated oath further says the 4th Degree Knight will "wage
relentless war, openly and secretly, against all heretics,
Protestants and Masons . . . and that I will hang, burn, waste,
boil, flay, strangle and bury alive those infamous heretics; rip
up the stomachs and wombs of their women and crash their infants
heads against the walls in order to annihilate their execrable
race."

Continuing, the unbelievable document said the Knights would also
wage war "secretly" using "the poisonous cup, the strangulation
cord, the steel of the poinard, or the leaden bullet . . ."

Should the Knight prove false, the fake oath says he agrees to
have his brethern "cut off my hands and feet and my throat from
ear to ear, my belly opened and sulphur burned therein . . ."

The Knight then allegedly states that he will always prefer a
Catholic to any other political candidate, especially a Mason.

Immediately following the fabricated text is a statement that the
oath appeared in the Congressional Record on February 15, 1913 at
page 3216. 

The World also set forth the real oath taken by Fourth Degree'
Knights, which is shown to be virtually the exact opposite of
what the Klan libelously charged.

The true oath taken by members of the 4th Degree of the Knights
of Columbus asserts:

"I swear to support the Constitution of the United Statea. I
pledge myself, as as Catholic citizen and Knight of Columbus,
to enlighten myself fully upon my duties as a citizen and to
conscientiously perform such duties entirely in the interest of
my country and regardless of all personal consequences."

The Knight further pledges to preserve "purity of the ballot" and
to "promote reverence and respect for law and order," and to
practice his religion openly and to exercise public virtue "as to
reflect nothing but credit upon our Holy Church. . . "

Moreover, in 1914, the "entire work, ceremonies and pledges of
the Knights of Columbus were submitted to a Masonic Committee of
the 32nd and 33rd degree Masons in California." Afterward, the
Committee issued a statement certifying that the Knights' oaths
were "intended to teach and inculcate principles that lie at the
foundation of every great religion and every great State."

The Masonic Committee further stated that the alleged oath "is
scurrilous, wicked and libelous, and might be the invention of an
impious and venomous mind."

Actually, anyone who was the least bit familiar with the solenm
oaths taken by Masons would suspect that the bogus Knights of
Columbus oath was written by a Mason. Such suspicion was well
founded.

On September 18, 1927, an article in The Worid was headlined:
"Bogus K. of C. Oath An Old Plagiarism."

The article said the bogus Fourth Degree K of C oath circulated
by the Klan is nearly identical in wording to an "oath first used
by the Paris Illuminati, as they were called in 1786-the name
being changed to Adepts in 1772 and Freemasons in 1778."

Continuing, the article said: "It was delivered in a cellar, back
of a house in Rue Vaugirard in Paris, first in 1772, in a lodge
attended by Jean Jacques Rousseau . . . Prince Louis Philippe . .
. Jean Paul Marat . . . John Paul Jones , Emanuel Swedenborg and
other conspirators, and was dictated by the celebrated charlatan
Cagliostro. . ." 

The World article added: "The irony of the matter is that the
K.K.K. assumes  the oath to be of Roman  Catholic origin and
against the Masons, whereas it really is of Masonic origin
against the Roman hierarchy and the French monarchy."

The series of articles also likened the Klan to the APA. One
article was headlined: "Ku Klux Klan As Venomous As The Old APA."
The report concerned the "virulent attacks on Catholics and their
Church" used by the Klan in recruitment efforts, particularly a
"Do You Know? card on which is listed such questions as:

"That a secret treaty made by him [the Pope] started [World War
I? . . .

"That he controls the daily and magazine press?

"That he denounces popular government as inherently vicious ...?

"That Knights of Columbus [members] declare they will make popery
dominant in the U.S? " 

The Klan's concern for the good name of Freemasonry hinted at
Masonic influence in the Ku Klux Klan. Certainly the bogus K of C
oath was shown to have been of 18th Century Masonic origin.

Therefore, it was ironic to learn that The World worried about
the Klan's secret oath which demanded "unconditional obedience to
the as yet unknown constitution and laws, regulations . . . of
the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan . . ."

The World also was disturbed by the "rigid secrecy" imposed upon
Klan members "even in the face of death, in regard to any and all
matters and knowledge" of the Klan.

The New York daily said it "has always in mind the potential
danger to the United States from a secret organization bound
together by such an oath , . . . and likely to draw into its
ranks men of no regard for anything but the Ku Klux law and
standards of conduct and ethics." 

The Craft And The Klan

What The World deplored about the Klan's "rigid secrecy," and the
danger to society of men binding themselves to solenm oaths to
accept or commit possible actions in the future which they were
totally ignorant of when they took their oaths, is precisely the
danger the Catholic Church always has seen in Freemasonry.

Indeed, it is remarkable that after three-months investigation by
one of the nation's major newspapers, the 21-part series made no
mention of the close bond between the Klan and Freemasonry.

After all, most of the Klan's major leaders were Freemasons. The
organization's founder, Col. Sinunons was a Mason, and a Knight
Templar. Also, C. Anderson Wright, King Kleagle of the New York
KIan and chief of staff of a Klan group known as Knights of the
Air, was a 32nd degree Mason. Dr. Hiram Evans, who succeeded
Simmons as Imperial Wizard, "for many years . . . was recognized
as one of the most active men in Masonry, and is a 32nd degree
Knight Commander of the Court of Honor . . . [who] had been
devoting almost his entire time to Scottish Rite Masonry at the
time the Klan was organized. . . ."

Israel Zangwill, a prominent London author, said he was told by a
Jewish rabbi that Dr. Evans inducted him into the 32nd degree of
the Masonic order. 

Further, initiations were held "in the Masonic Temple in New York
City," and the Klan shared office space in Beumont, Texas "with
the secretary of the Grotto, which, in a way, is a Masonic
organization."

Edward Young Clarke, a former publicity agent and fund raiser,
who became Imperial Kleagle (salesman) for the Klan "realized the
value of representing the Klan to be `the fighting brother' of
Masonry." Consequently, he issued orders that "none but men with
Masonic affiliations" should be employed as Kleagles in the
Klan's nationwide sales network.

Accordingly, he established the Great American Fraternity (GAF)
in Georgia in 1920 as a nationwide sales organization composed of
members of 13 secret societies believed to be hostile to the
Catholic Church. Klan salesmen were instructed "in selling
effective political anti-Catholicism to their brothers in their
respective lodges."

Members of the GAF included the Freemasons, Junior Order of
United American Mechanics, Independent Order of Odd Fellows,
Guardians of Liberty, Order of the Eastern Star, Daughters of
America, Rebekkahs, the Loyal Orange Institution, Knights of
Luther, National Legion of Pathfinders, and the Order of De
Molay. 

Although some Masonic spokesmen condenmed the Klan, there were
very few Masonic leaders who shared that view.

Charles P. Sweeney, writing in The Nation magazine in 1920, said
if responsible Masons "exerted a tithe of the influence they
possess, [they] could do more to stop the Know-Nothing program
than any other single force." 

Imperial Wizard Simmons denied the authenticity of a report that
the Masonic leadership in Missouri had condemned the Klan in
1920. He said he had addressed 3,500 people in the Shrine Temple
at St. Louis in September of that year, and learned that the
alleged Masonic condenmation "has been strongly denied."

The Minneapolis Daily Star reported that most Klansmen in the
city were Masons, while the State leaders included many popular
Shriners.

In Wisconsin, the Klan leader was William Wiesemann, "a local
insurance man who was prominent in Masonic circles."

Klan advertisements read: "Masons Preferred," and many Masons
joined, as did a number of Milwaukee's Socialists.

A New York Klansman claimed that 75 percent of the Klan
enrollment in that State were Masons. 

In Oregon, both Fred L. Gifford, head of the Klan in that State,
and his secretary, Frank Parker were Masons. Delegates of an
Oregon Klan front, the Good Government League, were Masons,
Orangemen, Odd Fellows and Pythians. 

In 1924, an editorial in the Scottish Rite New Age magazine said
the Rite holds "no brief for or against any organization outside
of the Scottish Rite," and added the following observation: If
Freemasonry follows the traditions of centuries, it "cannot
dictate to any Mason what shall or shall not be his affiliations
outside the lodge . . ."

The editorial then invited attention to a letter by the editor of
the Masonic Herald that appeared in The New York Times on August
28, 1923. The letter said "genuine Masons-Masons who are such in
their hearts-cannot be Klansmen, and cannot welcome with true
brotherly love Klansmen into their lodges."

Commenting on the Herald editor's letter, the New Age said:
"Possibly the editor of the Masonic Herald is prejudiced, but no
Masonic editor has any more right to speak pontifically for the
Masonic fraternity than [a Catholic priest]."

An article in the same publication commented: "One may not
subscribe to the Ku Klux Klan platforms in toto, but one may say
of these and similar anti-Catholic movements . . . this fellow
hath the right sow by the ear." 

Although most decent citizens were outraged by the Klan's rampant
bigotry, none of the Craft's Grand Lodges had taken "official
action in regard to the Klan."

Nationally, "attacks on Masonry" in Italy "fired the Klan to
renewed action and increased [its] membership" 

The above history strongly indicates that the Klan was a Masonic
front group. Certainly the Klan's venomous war on Catholics was
in keeping with a long tradition generally associated with the
Masonic fraternity.

The Klan In Action

In his article in The Nation, Charles Sweeney listed some of the
terrorism and murders attributed to the Klan:

- A sheriff in Waco, Texas, who stopped a parade of masked men
and demanded the names of the marchers was shot and removed from
office in proceedings "sponsored by the most influential citizens
of his county."

- In Birmingham, Alabama, a "Klansman" who killed a Catholic
priest in cold blood on his own doorstep "was acquitted at the
`trial' amidst the plaudits of the mob."

- In Atlanta, Georgia, members of the Board of Education received
letters threatening their lives when they hesitated to consider a
resolution to dismiss all Catholic public school teachers.

- In Naperville, Illinois, a Catholic church was destroyed by
fire two hours after a monster midnight Klan initiation in the
neighborhood.

- Imperial Wizard Simmons made clear that the Klan had "given the
world the open Bible, the little red school house, if you please,
the great public school system." 

The free publicity given to such a militant anti-Catholic
organization by The World's widely publicized articles, coupled
with Imperial Wizard Simmon's testimony before the House Rules
Committee only served to advance the rapid growth of the Klan.

Simmons whetted the insatiable anti-Catholic appetite when he
told the Committee there was available to the Klan "possibly the
greatest existing mass of data and material against the Roman
Catholics and Knights of Columbus." The material included
"affidavits and other personal testimony attributing to the Roman
Catholics and the Knights of Columbus in America more outrages
and crimes than the Klan has ever been charged with."

Included in the material, he said, are charges of "murder,
whipping, tar and feathers, and crimes of all natures."

At the time the House Rules Committee hearings were underway,
Congressman William Upshaw, a supporter of the Klan, introduced a
resolution to investigate "each and every secret order in the
United States." Ten days later the Committee called off further
investigation of the Klan. 

Typical of Klan techniques in the North, in 1922, was an incident
at Elizabeth, New Jersey. Five Klansmen marched into the Third
Presbyterian Church and handed the pastor an envelope in which
was enclosed a note and $25. The note expressed "appreciation
"for the way the deacon's fund was administered by the church,
and asserted that the Klan stood for "white supremacy, protection
of women, . . . and separation of church and state."

Five days later, the church's pastor, Rev. Robert W. Mark,
preached a sermon attacking the Knights of Columbus. He remarked
that if he had to choose between joining the K of C and the Ku
Klux Klan, he would select the Klan.

Rev. Mark said God intended the white race for leadership , but
that he (Mark) did not advocate suppression of any race. With
those words, he invited Rev. C.J. Turner, negro pastor of the
Siloam Presbyterian Church, who was sitting in the front row, to
join him on the platform. The two ministers stood side by side
singing "America." 

Cathophobia (or morbid fear and hatred of the Catholic Church)
was rapidly spreading across the nation. In November, 1923, for
example, Lowell Mellett, a nationally prominent journalist,
writing in the prestigious Atlantic Monthly magazine, recalled
stories circulated during his boyhood in Indiana which alleged
that Catholic youths were trained "to seize the whole country."
The same stories were rampant, he said, when he returned to his
hometown 30 years later. 

Mellett said the Klan was charged with being opposed to Jews,
Negroes and Catholics; however, he had heard "little concerning
Jews and Negroes," but "heard much concerning the Catholics." He
added: Very clearly, the crux of the Klan problem in Indiana is
the Catholic Church."

Some of Mellett's old friends, whom he characterized as "just
some of the best citizens in Indiana," were Klansmen. They
joined, he said , because they believed the Vatican "is soon to
be moved to Washington, D.C.," and because they opposed the
"fixed policy of the Church to keep its members down to a
definite level of ignorance."

One of the most serious charges against the Church, he remarked,
is that it "is endeavoring to obtain control of the public
schools."

He charged that newspapers "have feared the Catholic Church," and
agreed that was an article of Klan faith which "has a real
basis."

Mellett's answer to the Klan's problem with the Church was to
investigate, not the Klan nor other secret societies which were
viciously attacking the Church and her adherents, but rather to
investigate the Church. Catholic churches, he said should "be
forced open" to prove or disprove allegations "of buried rifles
and ammunition" 

If adopted, that proposal, and a similar outrageous suggestion by
Mellett, would have trampled the most basic religious and civil
rights of Catholics.

His other suggestion was that a commission of inquiry be
established to "call publicly for the presentation of every
charge against the Catholic Church that any responsible person or
group of persons might have to make, and then investigate the
truth of these charges." 

Nowhere in the article did Mellett furnish evidence to support
wanton Klan charges. Presumably, this outrageous assault on the
rights of citizens was warranted merely because a group of
friends, "just some of the best citizens in Indiana" thought it
would be nice.

Curiously, he never suggested an assault upon the Klan or
Freemasonry. In fact, he explicitly said the Klan and secret
societies should not be investigated. The reality was, however,
that abundant evidence had been presented over the years which
detailed the serious danger emanating from both the Klan and
Freemasonry.

Indeed, in the same issue of the Atlantic Monthly in which
Mellett's article appeared, there was a letter from "A Citizen of
Oklahoma" who said the State was under the "secret rule of a
hidden clique." He noted that the civil offices of the State "are
unquestionably in the hands of the Klan; and that fact makes it
impossible for the Governor to oust these officials."

In that regard, the unidentified letter writer observed that the
Governor was being considered for impeachment by the Klan and its
many sympathizers. The Klan, he remarked, "is the most dangerous
force at large in the country today."

Strangely, however, Lowell Mellett was convinced that the Roman
Catholic Church was far more dangerous than the Klan.

By 1925, the Klan was being widely accepted as American as apple
pie. The Nation editorialized that the Klan "has become safe-and
uninteresting." 

On August 9, 1925, Imperial Wizard Hiram W. Evans led a march of
some 25,000 Klansmen and Klanswomen down Pennsylvania Avenue in
Washington, D.C., in "their greatest national demonstration and
public show of strength," as 100,000 spectators cheered.

The "100 per cent Americans" knelt with heads bared at the
Washington Monument to pledge allegiance to "one country, one
language, one school and one flag." 

Dr. A. H. Gulledge, national speaker for the Invisible Empire,
advocated "race purity;' and said Klansmen would fight in order
that "the State and Church be kept separate in America."

Continuing, he said Protestants intended to see that "they shall
not press down upon the brow of Uncle Sam the thorny triple crown
of a foreign potentate."

If the nation is to survive, he added, "it cannot remain half
free and half parochial schools."

Dr. Gulledge prophesized: "Not until the sun shall hide its face
or the moon cease to shine or God resigns his throne in the
heavens, or until the white race becomes mongrelized, will the Ku
Klux Klan die." 

It should be emphasized that these Klansmen and Klanswomen were
not a bunch of stereotype Southern red-necks. These were militant
anti-Catholic race supremists from Connecticut, Delaware,
Michigan, New Jersey, New York and Ohio. Others were from
Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas and West
Virginia.

The following day, the leading daily in the nation's capital
carried an editorial titled, "An Impressive Spectacle," which
said the demonstration "may indicate" the Klan was "turning from
the un-American principles of race and religious restriction and
opposition that have been its most striking characteristic," and
is now "seeking to render real and valuable service to the
country."

The editorial said the march on Washington provided the Klan an
opportunity "to make itself a force for good without belying the
Americanism of which it bears the symbol."

It was evident the Klan was growing more powerful, a point made
by William R. Pattangall, a Protestant, a Mason, former Attorney
General of Maine, and that State's leading Democrat politician,
who also was the Klan's "most distinguished victim."

Pattangall said "Catholics and aliens have borne the brunt" of
the Klan's wrath. The Klan "menace," he said, "embraces the issue
of religious freedom, the issue of preserving equal opportunity
to all citizens, the issue of government by, of, and for all,
rather than a part, of the people."

The Klan, he noted, said: "Lincoln was assassinated by order of
the Pope, Mckinley killed by a Catholic, and Harding was poisoned
by the K of C." Further, "they [the Klan] solenmly read bogus
statistics to prove that 90 percent of the deserters in the World
War were Catholics acting under orders of the Church!" 

The Maine Democrat said further: "The Klan seeks a secret hold on
legislators, judges and other officials. It uses that hold to
enforce its own demands . . . It . . . acts secretly in both
parties, it tries constantly for control-secret control-of
elections, legislatures and governments. . . "

Replying to Pattangall's article, Imperial Wizard Evans ignored
most of the charges leveled by the former Maine Attorney General.
Rather, Evans ranted against the Catholic Church which, he said,
"has always opposed the fundamentel principle of liberty."

The Church, he declared, "is trying . . . to win control of the
nation," and Catholic politicians attempt to bring the Church
into politics. The Church, he went on, must show "that the need
of intolerance against it has passed." 

Although The New York Times suggested that the Klan was in
decline in 1926, its own statistics demonstrated the nationwide
Cathophope organization was quite robust.

The Times said there were 100,000 Klansmen in New York, who were
"fairly vigorous." Principal strongholds were Suffolk and Nassau
Counties on Long Island, as well as Westchester, Putnam,
Dutchess, Rockland, Sullivan and Ulster Counties. The Klan also
had "considerable influence" in Buffalo, and had influence on
elections in Binghamton and Rochester. 

A sampling of membership in the Kian in other States indicated
that the organization was rather strong. There were 50,000 in
Connecticut, 150,000 in Kansas, 150,000 in Missouri, 60,000 in
New Jersey, and 250,000 in Ohio. 

In Indiana, the public was scandalized to learn that D. C.
Stephenson, former Grand Dragon of that State, was convicted of
murdering a young woman and sentenced to life imprisonment.

Commenting on Stephenson, the Times said he "was the boss of the
Republican Party in Indiana, and that through him the Klan was in
control of offices and the process of government."

After the Klan extended itself to defeat Catholic Democratic
Presidential candidats Alfred E. Smith it went into decline for
two major reasons: first, the United States Supreme Court upheld
the Constitutionality of a New York anti-Klan law which required
the Klan to give pubiicity to its regulations, oaths and
memberships; and second, the Great Depression, which began in
1929, made keeping or finding a job, and feeding the family, far
more important than hating Catholics.

As it turned out, the 1928 general election proved to the
Democratic Party that there was a "Catholic vote." Although Smith
lost by 6.3 million popular votes to the Republican Herbert
Hoover, the Catholic Democrat garnered 6.6 million more votes
than did the 1924 Democratic standard bearer, John W. Davis.
Smith also received 5.8 million more votes than did the 1920
Democratic Presidential candidate, James M. Cox.

Four years later, Franklin D. Roosevelt, with the crucial
assistance of Catholic James E. Farley as Democratic Party
Campaign Chairman, appealed to that Catholic vote and rode the
Party to repeated victories during the next 16 years.

John F. Kennedy also appealed to that same constituency in 1960,
and won a tightly contested election. Some political observers
viewed that election as one of the most religiously intolerant
political contests since the days of the Ku Klux Klan.

It is now time to assess the impact America's long history of
antiCatholicism has had on freedom of religion in this nation.


10/WARRING ON THE STATE

The idea that a relative handful of men have conspired for years
to rule nations and the world according to their philosophy is
difficult for many people to grasp.

Yet, most thoughtful people will concede that Hitler, Mussolini,
Tojo and Stalin pursued that very idea and precipitated
incalculable carnage.

Cecil Rhodes believed "the absorption of the greater portion of
the world under our [English] rule simply means the end of all
wars." To accomplish his goal of world domination under English
rule, Rhodes drew up the first of six wills in which he
stipulated that a secret society was to carry out his scheme.
Later, he conceived of world domination in federation with the
United States, using "a secret society gradually absorbing the
wealth of the world." This plan is the "meaning of his last will
and the plan behind his scholarships."

That secret organization envisioned by Rhodes became the Round
Table Group of England, the "real founders of the Royal Institute
of International Affairs . . . the Institute of Pacific
Relations," and the "godfathers" of the Council on Foreign
Relations (CFR). 

Communism has long been recognized as a separate secret
conspiratorial movement to control the world. On the other hand,
Christianity is a completely open, non-secret conspiracy to bring
all men to salvation through Jesus Christ.

So what of Freemasonry?

One knowledgeable member of the Craft said: "The nature of
Freemasonry and of its traditions is responsible for the
difficulty the historian encounters in evaluating the influence
which the Fraternity has exercised on the development of the
Enlightenment . . . and all other progressive ideologies . . ."

The "nature" and "traditions" of Masonry refer to the
Fraternity's secrecy. The great advantage of secrecy, in addition
to advancing Masonry's cause, is that it permits Masons and their
supporters to use no other argument than ridicule to dismiss
charges that the Masonic Order subverts Church and State-charges
which have consistently been brought against the Fraternity by
various Popes and heads of states.

Secrecry, said Albert Pike, "is indispensable to Masonry."

In that connection, Masonry has 25 "landmarks," or canons which
are "unrepealable," and can "never be changed." Landmark no. 23
concerns "secrecy of the Institution." It admonishes initiates
that to change or abrogate such a requirement of confidentiality
"would be social suicide, and death of the Order would follow its
legalized exposure." Continuing, the same Landmark notes that
Freemasonry has lived unchanged for centuries as a secret
association, but as an open society, "it would not last for many
years."

One wonders why the organization must be so secret. Why would
openness bring "death of the Order"? Why would it "not last for
many years" if its secret activities were unmasked? Certainly,
that landmark suggests the Craft is something more than a
fraternal and charitable organization. Why hide good works?

The answeris : Freemasonry in America and elsewhere is far more
than a fraternal organization. It never hides its charitable
endeavors. But its secret work, is something else entirely. And
that secret work frequently has involved subversion of the
existing political order in any given State.

In 1884, Pope Leo XIII declared that Freemasonry uses "every
means of fraud or of audacity, to gain . . . entrance into every
rank of the State as to seem to be almost its ruling power."

Just over 100 years later, an unsigned article appeared in the
authoritative Vatican newspaper, L'Osservatore Romano, regarding
Masonry. The article was described by an official of the
Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith as a Vatican "policy
position." It said Masonry was much more than an association of
men of good will; that the Craft involves moral obligations for
its members, a rigid discipline of mystery and a climate of
secrecy that brings to members the risk of becoming the
instruments of strategies unknown to them. 

The hold of the Craft on initiates is almost total. One member of
the Fraternity said Masonry is one of the few organizations that
is "able to change the relationships created by nature," such as
family relationships.

To "produce the desired result," Masons must take vows and make
"a complete surrender" to the Masonic institution. ": . . there
can be no reservations" to the new league. 

Freemasonry, another Craftsman observed, "is-and must be-a
political force . . . the whole spirit of the Order, and
especially of the Scottish Rite, is a propulsion to political
action."

One Grand Commander commenting favorably on Masonic support for
revolutions in different parts of the world noted:

"They were charged in the Lodges with teachings that enabled them
to become individual champions of democratic progress and of
religious and civil liberty."

Masonry's mark is embedded in the Great Seal of the United
States,  and the official seal of the Supreme Court of California
was marked with numerous Masonic symbols during the period 1850-
1873. 

The Fraternity's activities in the American Revolution, Mexico,
and the Stakes of New York, Massachusetts and Pennsylvania, as
well as Albert Pike's work in the Civil War were noted in
Chapters one and two.

Masonry In The Civil War

The Craft's relationship to any nation was clearly explained at
the time of the Civil War in an 1861 letter from the Grand Lodge
of York Masons in Pennsylvania to their counterparts in
Tennessee. The letter said :

"Masonry is as old as government. It constitutes a government in
itself . . .

"Masonry is a sovereignty and a law unto itself . . . It knows
nothing but the principles and teachings of its faith.

"The proud position [of Masonry is to] stand aloof from the rise
and fall of empires, the disturbances in States, the wars of
contending nations, and rebellions and revolutions in
commonwealths or among people . . .

"The claims of a brother are not dissolved by war . . . the tie
once formed, is only sundered by death. 

The same letter said: "By the ancient Constitutions of Masonry, a
brother, even when engaged in rebellion against his country, is
still to be considered as a Mason; his character as such being
indefeasible." 
During the War of Secession, as the War Between the States is
sometimes called, the Union Government was seriously concerned
about several secret subversive groups which operated in the
North and South during the Civil War. Aithough military records
did not formally identify any of those organizations with
Freemasonry, the groups shared characteristics common to the
Masonic Fratemity. Like Masonry, those secret units

-Operated under a "Supreme Council" with a chief executive at
State level known as the "Grand Commander."

-Maintained a rigid secrecy about their activities. 

-Held formal meetings in "lodges" and "temples. 

-Restricted membership of the "vulgar herd" to the basic
"mysteries" of the group 

-Bound members by oaths which demanded blind obedience to
superiors. 

-Threatened awesome bodily mutilations and death if oaths of
secrecy were violated. 

-Utilized passwords, hand grips, and signs of distress to protect
the secret societies and their members. 

The Deputy Grand Commander of one of the secret societies,
Charles E. Dunn, of the Order of American Knights (OAK), insisted
that President Lincoln had "usurped" powers and thereby forfeited
all claim to support from members of the Order. Moreover, said
Dunn, action taken to force Lincoln's "expulsion" from power "is
an inherent right" which belongs to the Order, and is "not
revolution."

Dunn's statement is quite similar to the following words found in
Albert Pike's Morals and Dogma: [Rlesistance to power usurped is
not merely a duty which man owes to himself and his neighbor, but
a duty which he owes to his God."

Secret agent William Taylor of the Union's Provost Marshal's
office reported on an OAK Lodge meeting he attended, presided
over by Dr. John Shore, a St. Louis physician. During the
meeting, attended by 149 Lodge members, it was announced that
General Albert Pike had "promised arms and equipment" for a
military company then being formed by the Lodge. 

Subsequently, in a sworn statement, Dr. Shore denied membership
in OAK or any ather secret political organizations. However,
Shore did admit membership in Masonry, and said his obligations
to Masonry are "most assuredly" sacred and "of paramount
consideration."

In response to the Provost Marshal's question whether, "under
oath" he was permitted to reveal the secrets of Masonry before a
court of justice, Dr. Shore replied: "I am not."

A Fourth Degree member of OAK, Green B. Smith, in a sworn
statement, said an oath of the Order was "paramount to every
other oath."

Smith further indicated that the OAK might well have had Masonic
roots when he noted that the Order "extends back to the
Revolution of 1776, having had a previous existence up to the
Rebellion."

OAK was organized in 1873 by Clement L. Valandigham, a Democratic
Congressman from Ohio. The Order was known also as the Order of
tbe Sons of Liberty and the Knights of the Order of the Sons of
Liberty. 

Valandigham died June 17, 1871. His funeral was "under the
direction of the Masons," and "many members of the Masonic
fraternity" escorted his remains to his late residence. 

According to the Judge Advocate General of the Union Army, the
OAK Order engaged in the following activities:

-Aided soldiers to desert and protected deserters.
-Worked to undermine portions of the Army
-Furnished lawyers to find "some quasi-legal pretext" to help
soldiers leave the Army.
-Imbued military camps with a spirit of discontent and
disaffection, and "whole companies were broken up."
-Members of the Order who were drafted into the Army "were
instructed . . . to use their arms against their fellow soldiers,
rather than the enemy, or, if possible, to desert to the enemy."
-Assassinations and murders were carried out which were
"discussed at the councils of the Order."

President Andrew Johnson And Masonry

After Albert Pike had been tried and found guilty of treason for
his activities during the Civil War, Benjamin B. French, a 33rd
Degree Mason and member of the board of directors of the Supreme
Council of the Scottish Rite, wrote a letter, dated July 1, 1865,
to President Andrew Johnson (also a Mason) urging him to pardon
Pike. Additional appeals on Pike's behalf were made to the
President by Masons from different parts of the United States. 

On April 20, 1866, the Scottish Rite Supreme Council met in
Washington, at which time the Masons' Sovereign Grand Inspector
General, T.P. Shaffner of Kentucky wrote to the Attorney General
of the United States to request that Pike be pardoned. Two days
later, the President's military aide wrote to the Attorney
General, and "by order of the President," directed him "to send
to this office [the White House] warrant for pardon of Albert
Pike of Arkansas."
The following day, April 23, 1866, officials of the Supreme
Council, including Pike, "visited the President at the White
House," and the President handed Pike "a paper constituting a
complete pardon for his part in the Civil War." 

Nine months later, a list of "pardoned rebels," including Pike,
was released to the press. The list showed the names of the
pardoned individuals and the person or persons, if any, who had
spoken on behalf of the pardonedee. The entry for Pike read:

"Albert Pike, rebel Brigadier-General; by Hon. B.B. French, Col.
T.P. Shaffner, and a large number of others."

In March, 1867, the House Judiciary Committee began an
investigation into charges by some Congressmen that Johnson
should be impeached. Later, when the committee finally issued its
report, a key charge against the President was that "he pardoned
large numbers of public and notorious traitors . . ."

Shortly after the impeachment investigation began, Pike and
General Gordon Granger met with President Johnson at the White
House for approximately three hours. Subsequent to that meeting,
Genera] Granger was summoned before the Judiciary Committee where
he was asked to disclose the substance of the conversation with
the President. The General told the committee:

"They [President Johnson and Pike] talked a great deal about
Masonry. More about that than anything else. And from what they
talked about between them, I gathered that he [Pike] was the
superior of the President in Masonry. I understood from the
conversation that the President was his subordinate in Masonry.
That was all there was to it . . "

On June 20, 1867, the President received a delegation of Scottish
Rite officials in his bedroom at the White House where he receiva
the 4th through the 32nd Degrees of the Scottish Rite "as an
honorarium."

Later that month, the President journeyed to Boston to dedicate a
Masonic temple. Accompanying him was General Granger and a
delegation of the Knights Templar.

Addressing a crowd of well-wishers at a Boston hotel, President
Johnson said he came to the city "for two reasons, one of which
was to visit the State of Massachusetts. There is another
[reason]  it is true, to which I shall not allude on this
occassion."

On June 25, The New York Times page one lead story was headlined:
"Masonic Celebration," and provided many details of the history
and growth of Masonry in Massachusetts. Strangely, however, no
mention was made of the investigation of the Fraternity by the
Massachusetts Legislature in 1834 which reportedi Freemasonry was
"a distinct Independent Government within our own Government, and
beyond the control of the laws of the iand by means of its
secrecy, and the oaths and regulations which its subjects are
bound to obey, under Penalty of death."

Actually, the Times was so obviously overwhelmed by the Masonic
event that four of the seven colunms on page one of the June 25th
issue of that newspaper were devoted to extolling Masonry.

The New York daily said the 16,000 marching Masons, resplendent
in their regalia, were so impressive that "a finer looking body
of men has never before been seen in this city or elsewhere." 

At the Masonic Temple , the President was accompanied by General
Granger, Benjamin B. French and T. P. Shaffner.

During his address to the gathering, the President disclosed the
other reason he came to the State of Massachusetts. He said:

"I should not have visited Massachusetts, at least on the present
occasion, had it not been for the order of Masonry. I came in
good faith for the express purpose of participating and
witnessing the dedication of this temple today to Masonry, and as
far as I could, let it be much or little, to give my countenance
and my sanction."

Clearly, Scotish Rite Freemasonry had a friend in President
Andrew Johnson.

Masonry And The Philippine Insurrection

Conventional wisdom says the Philippine Insurrection of 1896 was
ignited because of native opposition to the power of the Catholic
Church in the Islands. The revolutionary fire was fueled by the
writings of Jose Rizal, augmented by the political leadership of
Emilio Aguinaldo. 

Subsequently, during the Spanish-American War, Commodore George
Dewey furnished arms to Aguinaldo and urged him to rally the
Philippine people against the Spanish. However, when the United
States succeeded Spain as the ruling colonial power, Aguinaldo
led a new revolt that became largely a guerrilla action, and
"cost far more money and took far more lives than the
Spanish-American War."

That is the conventional thumb-nail account of events in the
Philippines at the turn of the Century, but it is quite
superficial and misleading. In reality the Philippine
Insurrection was orchestrated by Freemasonry, and while Emilio
Aguinaldo indeed led that revolution, he did so as a dedicated
member and tool of the Craft.

That insight into Philippine history was suppressed by the United
States Government for 45 years, until it finally was revealed by
historian John T. Farrell in 1954. 

The United States Government concealed the real history of the
Insurrection, according to a National Archives pamphlet, because
of a "reluctance to publish facts that might prove injurious to
exrevolutionists, Federal officials, and military personnel."
Also some people felt the War Department report "expressed a
personal viewpoint and was not an objective study of Philippine
affairs." 

Captain John R.M. Taylor, author of the War Department's
suppressed report, noted that lodges of the Masonic Grand Orient
of Spain were established in the Philippine Islands around 1890,
and proselytes from those lodges formed the Katipunan, a Tagalong
Masonic revolutionary organization. 

The Katipunan was the outgrowth of a series of nine associations
formed by a revolutionary clique to seek independence for the
Philippines. To accomplish that purpose, The clique mounted a
systematic attack on the monastic orders in the Islands to
undermine their prestige, "and to destroy their influence upon
the great mass of the population."

A 1898 "Memorial" from the Dominican Fathers to the Spanish
Government said:

"In consequence of the teaching of the Freemasons, the voice
of the parish priest has no longer any effect on numbers of the
natives, especially at Manila and in the neighboring provinces 
. . .

"The Freemasons . . . have recommended the war against us." 

And the Spanish commander of Manila's Civil Guard, Olegario Diaz,
wrote on October 28, 1896:

"It is fully proven that Masonry has been the principal cause of
the trouble in these islands, not only from the advanced and
irreligious ideas scattered about, but more by the foundation of
secret societies of a distinctly separatist character." 

Commander Diaz also said the Grand Master of the Spanish Grand
Orient sent Masons to establish native Masonic lodges of
exclusive Tagalong character. Within flve years, 180 Tagalong
lodges had been established in the Philippines. 

The Masons planned and carried out a "brutal and shameless
campaign" against monastic Orders and constantly ridiculed
religion. Later, this campaign acquired a political character,
which included attacks on the central government and the
authorities in the Archipelago. 

Jose Rizal established a secret society called the Philippine
League to which only Masons were admitted to membership. Its
purpose was to educate the people in liberal ideas and ultimately
armed rebellion.

The League was governed by a Supreme Council. The founders of the
organization "took a solemn oath on a human skull, which they
afterward kissed, and signed a document of agreement with their
own blood, making the necessary incision in one of their arms."
Further, every initiate "was bound to carry on the propaganda by
every means in his power . . . and under severe penalties to
guard the secret oath, to report everything they knew to the
League, and to obey their superiors blindly." 

Organizers of the Katapunan and members of its first Supreme
Council also were members of Rizal's Philippine League. 

One section of the oath taken by members of the Katapunan asked:

"Do you swear before Our Lord Jesus that you will be able to
assassinate your parents, brothers, wives, sons, relatives,
friends, fellow townsmen or Katipunan brothers should they
forsake or betray our cause?" 

Punishment for disobeying Katipunan directives-which included
all Philippine people "whether they want to be or not"-was
sobering. It consisted of being buried alive and then having the
murdered person's possessions-including his family-taken by
members of an organization called the "mandudicut." That
punishment was decreed by Emilio Aguinaldo, the Katipunan Supreme
Leader and dictator. 

Information about some of the operations of the Katipunan was
furnished by a member of the organization, Teodoro Patino, a
printer for Diario de Manila, a local daily. Patino gave the
information to his sister, who was a student at the Catholic
college at Lauban, operated by the Sisters of Charity. The girl
told the Mother Superior, who later interviewed the printer. The
Mother Superior told Patino to pass the information to Father
Mariano Gil, his pastor, which he did.

As a result, documents were seized at the Diorio, a number of
members of the Katipunan were arrested, and numerous letters and
other material were found which corroborated Patino's statement.

Further corroboration was provided by a report of Isabelo de Los
Royes, who gathered most of his information in prison from a
Katipunan member. 

The U.S. War Department document includes a report by the Civil
Governor of Manila, Manuel Luengo to the Spanish Colonial
Minister. The report, dated October 1, 1896, includes "An
Extraordinary Document of Philippine Masonry, Giving Instructions
To Be Carried Out At The Outbreak Of The Rebellion." The
"Instructions" say, in part:


"Fourth. While the attack is being made on the Captain
General and other Spanish authorities, the men who are loyal will
attack the convents and behead their infamous inhabitants. As for
the riches contained in said convents, they will be taken over by
this G.R. Log. [i.e., Grand Regional Lodge] . . .


"Seventh. The bodies of the friars will not be buried, but will
be burned in just payment for the crimes which during their lives
they committed against the noble Filippinos for three centuries
of hateful domination."

Names listed at the end of the "Instructions" are shown as
"President of the Executive Committee, Boliva. The Vice Grand
Master, Gordiano Bruno. The Grand Secretary Galileo."

Captain Taylor said other documents show the names actually are
pseudonyms for President Andres Bonifacio; Vice Grand Master, Pio
Valenzuela; and Grand Secretary, Emilio Jacinto.

Bonifacio seized the leadership of the Katipunan in January,
1896, and turned the Masonic Supreme Council of that organization
into the insurgent government of the Philippines, with himself as
dictator. Emilio Aguinaldo succeeded him.

The American Connection with Philippine Masonry

Insurgent Record No. 8 lists letters found in the papers of E.A.
[Emilio Aguinaldo] which show that a Masonic Lodge called
"Patria" was used to cover insurgent intrigues in October, 1899.

Insurgent Record No. 9 is a copy of an undated letter from Juan
Utor y Fernandez, a 33rd Degree Mason, to U.S. Army Chaplain
Charles Pierce, relative to the establishment of a newspaper to
be named "Patria." The letter to Chaplain Pierce says the
"brothers [i.e. Freemasons] who put their confidence in me . . .
[believe that] by your and my cooperating with our brother
American Masons, and especially with the good will and wishes of
Senor Otis, may cause the happy day [of peace] to arrive . . ."

Continuing, Fernandez said he expected the cooperation of "the
most worthy General Otis, and our brothers . . ." 

Another letter by Fernandez, now shown as editor of La Patria
Democratic Daily, to Don Ambrosio Flores, dated October 8, 1899,
introduces the bearer of the letter, one Senor Giselda, who has
with him a copy of La Patria. The letter urges Flores to read and
provide Ferandez with an opinion of the publication. Fernandez's
letter added:

"I am in relation with some American brothers of importance, and
if we can give, secretly, a Masonic character to the peace we
perhaps shall succeed in guaranteeing it from attack in the
future since you know, dear brother, the England and the United
States are the two countries in which the Masonic institution has
most respect and weight."

According to a letter received by Aguinaldo from La Patria, the
newspaper was established, apparently with the approval of the
American General, Otis, "to inaugurate a frank campaign against
the annexationist sentiment" being advanced by two other Masonic
dailies.

The writer, Aurelio Tolentino, said he had formed an association
with seven people, "and indeed we told General Otis of it through
Mr. Pierce, a Protestant clergyman in the confidence of said
General . . . The General approved our political plan and, as a
result, we published our first number on the 16th of September
last."

The letter continued by noting that Tolentino and some colleagues
had founded "Patria" Masonic Lodge "to which no one in favor of
autonomy belongs in spite of some having applied for admission."
The object of his group, he said, is to work for his government
and to "better consolidate the laws of Liberty, Equality and
Fraternity."

The references to "Senor Otis" and "General Otis," suggest that
the man belonged to the Masonic Fraternity. Although the General
is not further identified in the War Department report, General
Elwell S. Otis, was at the time U.S. Army Commander in the
Philippines, and Director of Civil Government.  Also, Harrison
Gray Otis, owner and publisher of The Los Angeles Times, served
as a Brigadier General in the Philippines during the Spanish
American War. 

Of the two, it would seem that Major General Elwell S. Otis, as
head of Civil Government, would have been the General most
closely involved in authorizing the establishment of a newspaper
in the Islands.

As for Aguinaldo, he and other Masons organized the Triagle
Magdole which later became the Magdolo Lodge. The proclamation of
the first Philippine Republic took place on the porch of
Aguinaldo's home, an edifice which also served as the Magdolo
Lodge. 

In January, 1955, Aguinaldo said: "It cannot be denied that the
Filipino Revolution against Spain was the work and glory of
Freemasonry in the Philippines."

Masons also were "instrumental in working for the grant of
Philippine independence by the United States."

Additional evidence of Masonic influence in the Philippines
surfaced following World War II.

First, shortly after the War's close, Federal Reserve regulations
prohibited organizations and individuals from sending abroad more
than $500. However, in response to pressure exerted by General
Douglas MacArthur (a prominent Freemason), the Federal Reserve
Bank of Richmond, Virginia, authorized Grand Commander John
Cowles of the Scottish Rite's Southern Jurisdiction to send $5000
to the Philippines to rebuild and restore Masonic property.
Shortly thereafter, the Federal Reserve authorized another
$15,000 to be sent by Masons to the Islands, followed by another
$100,000 sent by the Brethem in California. 

Secondly, the Craft was successful in amending legislation
designed to rehabilitate property of churches and other religious
organizations lost or damaged due to the War, so that it covered
Masonic property. The Masonic amendment added the words "any
corporation or sociedad anonima" [i.e. secret society] organized
pursuant to the laws in effect in the Philippine Islands at the
time of its organization.

As a result of that legislation (Public Iaw 79-370), eighty
percent of the cost of repairs for Scottish Rite Temples in the
Philippines was underwritten by U.S. taxpayers. 

Interestingly enough, in May, 1955, a claim for recovery of World
War II loss and damage to Catholic property on the Philippines
was disallowed. 

Finaily, it should be noted that one Philippine statesman made
known his serious reservations about demands the Fraternity
imposes upon its initiates.

Brother Manuel Quezon, former President of the Philippine
Commonwealth, although selected for advancement to the 33rd
Degree, declined the dubious honor, because "he feared some way,
sometime, that there might be some obligation in accepting the
honor which would be in conflict with his allegiance to the
Philippines."

Masonry And World War I

Some sources attribute World War I to Masonic intrigue. However,
according to a New Age editorial, the War was precipitated by a
"secret treaty" between the Vatican and Serbia, which would have
annexed Serbia to the Vatican State and imposed canon law on that
non-Catholic country. When the treaty became known, the editorial
continued, Archduke Franz Ferdinand, "Roman Catholic heir to the
Austro-Hungarian throne [and] known to be a secret party to the
policy embodied in the treaty," was assassinated by Gavrilo
Princep. 

Not mentioned by the Scottish Rite journal was the fact that the
alleged assassins of the Archduke were members of the "Black
Hand," a South Slav revolutionary organization which was a
progeny of Freemasonry. 

During the trail, Princep testified that his colleague,
Ciganovitvh, "told me he was a Freemason;" and, on another
occasion, "told me that the Heir Apparent [Franz Ferdinand] had
been condemned to death by a Freemason's lodge."

Moreover, another of the accused assassins, Chabrinovitch,
testified that Major Tankositch, one of the plotters, was a
Freemason. 

Communism And Freemasonry

The legacy of World War I was the Russian Revolution and the
scourge of International Communism, both of which had Masonic
influence.

James H. Billington, in his penetrating treatise on the history
of modern revolution, documents the intimate ties between
Freemasonry, Illuminism and modern revolutions. Of Freemasonry.
He says:

"So great, indeed, was the general impact of Freemasonry in the
revolutionary era that some understanding of the Masonic milieu
seems an essential starting point for any serious inquiry into
the occult roots of the revolutionary tradition."

Billington notes that the "masonic lodges of Geneva provided the
ambiance" in which the early l9th Century revolutionary, Filippo
Giuseppe Buonarotti- the "first apostle of modern communism"-
formulated "his first full blueprint for a new society of
revolutionary republicans: the Sublime and Perfect Masters." Both
the society's name and three levels of membership proposed for it
"had been adopted from Masonry."

The New Age observed that after 1825, many Russian Masons exiled
themselves to France where lodges operating in the Russian
language were sponsored by the Grand Orient. Some of the exiles
later returned to Russia, and organized lodges in St. Petersburg
and Moscow. Later, additional lodges were organized in the early
20th Century and had "an avowedly political aim and view; namely,
that of the overthrow of the autocracy." 

The Scotish Rite monthly added: "The first Revolution in March,
1917 is said to have been inspired and operated from these lodges
and all the members of Kerenski's government belonged to them." 

The Craft And Spanish Communism

The Craft's empathy with Communism was evident in Spain. In 1927
fraternal relations were "resumed between the U.S.S.R. and the
Spanish Scottish Rite. 

Four years later, King Alfonso XII was forced into exile, and
Masons, Communists, Socialists and Anarchists came into power.
The Catholic Church was disestablished, and education was
secularized. In June, 1931, the "Bulletin" of the Supreme Council
of the Scottish Rite in Spain boasted:

"The new Republic . . . was the perfect image molded by the
gentle hands of our doctrines and principles. There will not be
effected another phenomenon of a political revolution more
perfectly Masonic than the Spanish one." 

By 1933 a conservative reaction had set in, but the Marxist-
Masonic group returned to power and governed from 1935 to 1939
when they were toppled, precipitating the Spanish Civil War.

With the ouster of the Marxists-Masons, the New Age pleaded
repeatedly for Americans to support the Spanish Loyalists. People
were urged to write their Congressmen to repeal legislation
passed in 1937 which embargoed shipments of munitions and war
materials to the Marxist government of Spain. 

In February, 1939, the New Age called attention to a meeting of
two groups in Washington, D.C. which took opposite positions on
aiding the Masonic-supported Marxists in Spain.

One group was the National Conference to Lift the Embargo Against
Republican Spain. The other, called Keep the Embargo Committee,
was supported by Monsignor [later Archbishop] Fulton J. Sheen,
notable Catholic orator, author, and authority on Communism.

In his addsess at Constitution Hall before Keep the Embargo
Committee supporters, Msgr. Sheen identified the Loyalists as
"Red Spain," and urged "all those who believe in freedom,
democracy and religion to join in a protest against the `Reds'
supporting the Loyalist cause in this country."

The pro-Loyalists met at the Masonic Almas Shrine Temple.
Included among the speakers at that rally were Lieutenant Colonel
John Gates, representing Friends of the Abraham Lincoln Brigade,
and Herbert Biberman, motion picture director. 

[Interestingly, several years later, the New Age published a list
of organizations considered by the Attorney General of the United
States as "subversive" to the national security interests of
America. Included in the list was the Abraham Lincoln Brigade,
which was cited as a Communist Party front organization]. 

The Scottish Rite monthly journal also noted that Spain's
Nationalist Army of 1936-1939 "marched to war singing the battle
song of Rafael del Riego, an unsuccessful revolutionary (and a
Mason)." 

The Masonic publication also said five cabinet members of the
Loyalist government were Masons, as were five leading generals.
However, a British history of the Spanish Civil War suggested
that all the General officers of the Loyalist Army were Masons. 

Communist China And Masonry

In 1925, the New Age reported that a Chinese secret society
[tong] "pretended" to be Masonic in 1903-1904, in order to secure
protection of American Masons, which was forthcoming. However,
the real object of the tong was to overthrow the Manchu dynasty.

That report was clarified some years later when it was explained
that the Hoon Bong, or Red Society of China, was founded by Hoong
Hsieu Chuan, some of whose "educators were Masons." And "[a]ided
by such friends, Hoong formed a secret society to oppose the then
ruling Manchu Dynasty . . .

"The Hoong Bong contributed materially to the overthrow of the
Manchu Dynasty . . "

Prior to World War II, Masons praised militant Chinese Communist
leader, Chou En Lai, who was extolled as the person largely
responsible for negotiating the Sian Agreement of 1936 which
terminated the Chinese civil war.

A Masonic writer said the Agreement "indicates that the Red Army
of China represented an agrarian movement based on a
patriotically inspired program . . . If from ths@ war emerges a
real democracy for China, there will be no occasion for the old
Red Army to again come to life as such. It can be merged into a
government that believes in fair representation of all classes,
and is in that process now."

More direct American identification with Chinese Masonry occurred
in 1943 when John Stewart Service instituted the Fortitude Lodge
at Chunking. 

Mr. Service was a diplomatic adviser to General Joseph Stilwell
and General Albert Wedemeyer in China during World War II.
Commenting on that situation, journalist M. Stanton Evans has
written:

"In that position he [Service] maintained a running fire of
criticism against America's only ally Chiang Kai-shek,
contrasting his `Kuomintang' regime unfavorably with that of the
Chinese Communists."


On June 7, 1945, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
arrested Service and five others for alleged violation of the
Espionage Act. However, he was not indicted; although in 1951,
the U.S. Civil Service Commission's Loyalty Review Board found
"there is reasonable doubt as to his loyalty," and he should be
"forthwith removed from the rolls of the Department of State."
Nevertheless Service remained with the Department until his
resignation in August, 1962.


Masonry, Communism And The Catholic Church

In 1948, Grand Commander John Cowles said religion "is freer in
Russia today than it is in Roman Catholic Spain." 

By 1950, the Scottish Rite feared the Catholic Church would
"capture the United States" and turn it against Russia. This
grandiose plan supposedly was to be accomplished by using the
U.S. government and its resources "to annihilate Russia and
Russian opposition to the Pope."

During the years immediately following World War II, the Scottish
Rite Masons repeatedly insisted that the Catholic Church is far
more dangerous than Soviet Communism.

Catholicism, not Communism nor Socialism is Masonry's immediate
worry, the New Age said. 

"How much longer are the free peoples of the Western World going
to submit to resistance being confined to Russia, while they lift
neither voice nor fist to strike the even more insidious force of
the Vatican Church-State?", a New Age editorial asked. 

Minimization of the threat of Communism and magnification of an
alleged threat posed by the Catholic Church was a consistant
theme of the New Age during the mid- 1950s. 

Freemasonry, Nazism and Fascism 

The unremitting antagonism of the Scottish Rite toward the Roman
Catholic Church is well documented. Therefore, it is surprising
to find the official publication of that Rite testifying to the
Church's early opposition to Hitler, at a time when the Craft
itself was currying favor with the Nazis.

In 1931, the New Age reported: "the Hitlerites are facing stiff
opposition from a newly organized group headed by five leading
bishops of the Roman Catholic hierarchy in Germany."

Continuing, the article said:

"The anti-Fascist stand on the part of the Catholic Church was
first asserted by the Bishops of Bavaria and Silesia, who in
official statements virtually excluded members of the Nationalist
Socialist Party from the church. At the present time, [other
Catholic bishops] have succeeded in virtually lining up the
entire Catholic population of the republic against the
Hitlerites.

"In a statement, the Bishops charge the Fascisti with preaching
hatred and racial religion . . ." 

Eight years later, the New Age found that when the Nazi
revolution came to Germany, Albert Einstein looked first to the
universities, then to editors of newspapers, and to individual
journalists to speak out against Hitler's engulfing tyranny. But
his efforts were in vain, because those elements in German
society were silenced. Einstein added:

"Only the Church stood squarely across the path of Hitler's
campaign for the suppression of truth . . . [Tlhe Church alone
has had the courage and persistence to stand for intellectual
truth and moral freedom."

In its efforts to curry favor with Hitler, one Mason wrote in the
New Age: "I do not belong to Hitler, as I do not know his opinion
about Masons, but he seems to be an honest man and therefore his
movement has become strong. It is not the intention of the
Hitlerites to expel the Jews. We have Jewish families in Germany
who came with the Romans and settled here peacefully for
centuries . . . the Hitlerites are opposed to the lower class
elements which have immigrated here from foreign countries,
importing Bolshevistic ideas . . . 

In 1933, various German Masonic lodges changed their names, in an
effort to avoid being closed down by Hitler. Also, many lodges
broke relationship with foreign Masonic groups to demonstrate
their German nationalism and to indicate they were merely
fraternal organizations. 

Commenting on the situation, The New York Times noted that German
Masonic lodges were adopting Christian names. One called itself
the National Christian Order of Frederick the Great, which
prompted the Times to editorialize: "Neither Frederick nor his
close chums Voltaire and Catherine of Russia have hitherto
figured as conspicuous Christians." 

German Masonry also was "pleading for the admission of its
members to the Nazi Party." By-laws of the Fraternity were
changed to stipulate: "This order professes a German Christianity
which has much in commnon with the primitive sun worship. The
order's symbols are the sun and the cross." 

Eligibility for membership in German Masonry became limited to
those Christian who can prove pure Teutonic descent for three
generations. 

But the Nazis were not the only subjects of Masonic sychophancy.
The New Age discloses:

"Masons adhered to Fascism at the beginning and even contributed
toward the march on Rome. Freemasonry, officially, was never
hostile to Fascism until Il Duce, influenced by the Vatican,
prepared a bill against secret societies, forgetting to include
in it the Society of Jesus, which is the most secret society in
the world." [Emphasis in original]. 

By 1934, Masonry's efforts to temporize with the Nazis proved
unsuccessful. Acting on Hitler's orders, Hermann Goering
dissolved all the lodges, including those which purported to be
Christian. 

Although the New Age had been somewhat ambivalent about the war
against the Axis Powers prior to 1939, it's militancy on the
issue galvanized after the Duke of Kent, brother of the reigning
king, George VI , was selected as the Grand Master of the Grand
Lodge of England in 1939. That action by the English Masons
continued an unbroken tradition of intinmte association between
Freemasonry and English royalty that goes back to 1737. 

By late summer, 1940, the New Age became a strong advocate of
U.S. involvement in the war, at first urging direct aid to
England, but later pressing for direct American entry into the
war. 

An editorial called the Brotherhood to "rally to the support of
England, not alone because that country is the last stronghold of
Freemasonry in Europe . . ." The editorial said the "enemies" of
the Craft "would have reason to respect the military power
influence could marshal in this country," if it chose to do so. 

Nevertheless, the American people were strongly opposed to
sending their youth to fight on foreign soil. The strong division
of opinion on the subject was evident by the one-vote margin with
which the House approved legislation in September, 1940, calling
for a miiitary draft. And by the summer of 1941, the first
draftees were chanting "OHIO," meaning: "Over the Hill in
October"-or a massive flight from military service once the
troops had served one year of compulsory military duty.

As the public sentiment became increasingly divided on
involvement in Europe, the New Age continued to press for U.S.
entry into the War. Finally, the issue was settled when the
Japanese bombed Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941.

Meanwhile in Europe, the Masonic Brotherhood continued to operate
in "secret circles in the private security of locked homes to
carry on their Masonic work," according to Brother Meyer
Mendelsohn, a French refugee who emigrated to the United States. 

Brother Mendelsohn's statement was confirmed and elaborated upon
in an unusually candid and lengthy letter written by a German
Mason to the Commanding General, Headquarters, U.S. Forces
European Theatre, in connection with a request that Freemasons be
legally permitted to assemble.

Masonry's Political Orientatian Confirmed

The writer of the letter, Wilfrid Schick, a resident of Munich,
and "speaker for my comrades," urged the European Commander to
reopen the Symbolische Grossloge von Deutschland, which he
characterized as a philosophical lodge organized on an
international basis to serve "the idea of the general world
chain."

Herr Schick told how Lodge members during the War use
"appropriate manoeuvres" and "skillful tactics of the freemasons"
to destroy or otherwise secure all Craft documents relating to
membership and operation of the Grand Lodge. Those tactics, he
said, destroyed the "outward organization" of the Grand Lodge,
while allowing the Brotherhood to work in the "smallest circles"
to carry on a "quiet, permanent struggle" against "the power of
suppression." 

The Bavarian Mason asked that the U.S. military officials utilize
the civilian radio network to help him in locating other German
Masons. 

Confirming that Masonry avoids all conventional religious
beliefs, Brother Schick also made it clear that Masonry's
interest in "education "extends far beyond formal schooling at
elementary through university levels. Such "education" also
includes the inculcation of Masonic philosophy into polititcal
party doctrines.

In that regard, he said the basic beliefs of "true freemasonry,"
center on the "eternal, inborn rights of every individual . . .
and the avoiding of all dogmatic and intolerant bindings . . ."

It was vital, he insisted, that Freemasonry be expanded in
Germany in order "to maintain the exclusivity" which is
"absolutely necessary to create . . . a highly qualified
freemason leader class."

Every Freemason, he continued, must be granted the right to
participate in politics "without limitation" in order to "win
influence on the public life and on the governmental
administration, with the assistance of political parties."

Important to that effort, he stated, is the necessity to make "a
concentrated penetration of . . . party doctrines with freemason
ideas."

The "real sphere" of the Lodge, he added, is "to fulfil an
educational mission." 

The Bavarian Mason also confirmed that Masonry uses the same
deceptive techniques which were first revealed in connection with
Adam Weishaupt's Bavarian Illuminati.

Brother Schick said the Craft must propagate the ideas of world
Freemasonry by using "a number of institutions for education."
Such institutions, he continued, "will have to be created as the
first elements to the real lodges." He proposed, as did
Weishaupt, that the institutions be "in the form of societies for
politics, economic politics, for art and sciences, etc." Those
types of "institutions," he observed, would appeal to the best
class of people, including youth. 

Schick confirmed that the Catholic Church is a particular
obstruction to Masonry's success. He said, in the "occidental
cultural sphere" [i.e. , Europe, North and South America] only
the Catholic Church" stands as an opponent of Freemasonry by
appealing to the "dogma-bound" people, while Masonry appeals to
the "dogmaless." 

The Bavarian Craftsman made it clear that Freemasonry's
principles of "love of the mother-country and duties as a
citizen" must never be wrongly understood. "Superordinated to
all," he insisted, "is the duty . . . towards the all-uniting
commumity of fellowfreemasons of the democratic world."

Finally, Brother Schick insisted that any attack on the "natural
rights of humanity" by "the schools of religion or political
dogmatists" must never be tolerated, but rather strongly "opposed
. . . with active fighting . . ."

U.S. Military Opposes Masonry

Herr Schick had to wait two months for a reply from the military
commandant. Finally, on December 10, 1945, he was notified that
Freemasonry could not be reactivated, because the Intelligence
Division (G-2) found Freemasonry to be "a secret organization and
. . . their meetings should be prohibited."

The question of revival of the German Masonic Order was raised
again by General Lucius Clay, Commander of the Office of Military
Government, in a message to General Joseph McNarney, Commander of
the European Forces. McNarney replied by secret cable: "Policy
this headquarters is to prohibit application of German Masonic
Order at this time. Previous application for permission to
reestablish was unfavorably considered . . . Decision based on
the grounds that the Masonic Order is a secret organization and
also on the uncertain security situation."

A memorandum by the legal division of the Office of Military
Government (OMG), Germany, dated April 1, 1946, noted that
members of the Hohenzollern family were Freemasons and that the
Craft "flourished" under the Weimar Republic. Under the Nazis,
the memorandum, said the lodges were viewed as "a centre of
international conspiracy to destroy Germany," and were,
accordingly, dissolved. 

That memorandum served as a background document for another
memorandum written by General Clay to the War Department on June
27, 1946 relative to a German-American Club in the U.S. Zone
known as the Cosmopolitan Club.

GJeneral Clay noted that the Club was dissolved because Prince
Louis Ferdinand, a grandson of Kaizer Wilhelm, was a close friend
of Captain Merle A. Potter, director of Military Government at
Bad Kissingen, who also was the organizer and president of the
Club.

Prior to his World War II service, Potter had been a movie critic
for the Minneapolis Journal for 17 years. He described the Club
as a Kiwanis-type organization, and said no discussion of
politics was permitted during Club meetings. The organization
reportedly was comprised of professional men and business
executives.

However, Potter was reassigned following dissolution of the
Cosmopolitan Club, "because of the poor judgment exercised by
Captain Potter in having Louis Ferdinand as a member of the Club
and his personal friend."

The memorandum added: "We fully recognize that the association of
a Military Government Officer with a member of the Hohenzollern
family will be misunderstood at home, in Germany, and by our
allies." 

On July 3, 1946, Major General H.R. Bull, Chief of Staff, U.S.
Forces European Theatre, informed Clay that he (Bull) and General
McNarney were concerned about security problems associated with
secret social organizations. At the same time, he said
"penetrating" such groups by Counter-Intelligence Corps (CIC)
agents "could be of doubtful practicable" value. Nevertheless,
the Chief of Staff was concerned about the secret social clubs,
because fraternizing under "the cloak of secrecy . . . might well
be abused." Accordingly, General Bull said he and General
McNarney recommented that any directive allowing meetings of
social groups and secret societies be "deferred indefinitely." 

Masonry Wins Again

However, despite that recommendation, the Allied Military
Government for Germany approved reactivation of the German Grand
Lodge of Freemasonry on July 23, 1947. 

By October, 1947, Captain Potter had been promoted to Major, and
became adviser to the Chief of Staff on American-German
relations.

On October 8, Potter wrote a letter to the Military Government of
Germany reporting on a conference which took place September 23-
27, 1947, which was attended by twelve American-German Social
Discussion Clubs. A summary of the minutes of that conference
showed that those attending had discussed formation of a United
States of Europe. The topic was characterized as "a subject of
outstanding discussion." 

The conference mentioned by Major Potter appeared to be uncannily
similar to Herr Schick's proposal for establishing "institutions
for education" in Masonic philosophy, such as "societies for
politics, economic politics, for art and sciences, etc."

In that regard, the idea of a United States of Europe, and the
concept that Masonry "had no nationality" was advanced in the
French lodges. 

As a matter of fact, early in the War years, Masonic spokesmen
had viewed World War II as a turning point for the Fraternity,
and spoke of the "world government" expected to be established at
the conclusion of the War to help usher in a "newer phase of
evolutionary progress." 

A Czech Mason  said the struggle for the freedom of man began
with the American and French Revolutions, and World War II "is
the climax of a world ideological struggle which started at the
end of the l8th Century. It is the struggle of the New Age
against the Middle Age."

Masonry In Japan

Meanwhile, on the other side of the world , Masonry had gotten
off to a rather slow start.

In 1893, Japanese law empowered police to attend and superintend
any organized group meeting, and to break up any such gatherings
if the police determined there was any reason for doing so.
Secret meetings were prohibited.

Because of that situation, Scottish Rite Masons in Japan
contacted the Grand Commander in Washington, D.C. and urged him
to explain the situation to the President of the United States
and the Secretary of State. Apparently that was done, and
Japanese law was not enforced against U.S. Scottish Rite Masons. 

However, in 1936, the Japanese Government became alarmed at what
it called the "mysterious world organization" known as
Freemasons, and "secretly investigated the Craft."

The concern was not surprising. At that time, the Masonic "Club"
of Kobe, Japan, had been in existence for 65 years as the
Japanese branch of Freemasonry. It was viewed as "a secret
society of Judea which has been picturing a phantasm of a
mysterious world." Branches of the "Club" were located in Kobe,
Yokahama, Tokyo, and in Korea. 

The Kobe Masonic Club came into existence in strict privacy. The
Club was made up of several lodges, such as the Rising Sun Lodge,
and the Lodge Hyogo and Osaka (Scottish). Most of the leading
foreign residents from England, America, France, Switzerland,
Sweden and Denmark "secretly affiliated themselves with the
Club," which had as a "principal object . . . to "bring about a
world revolution." 

In October, 1942, the New Age ran an article by one of 10
Freemasons who had returned to the United States from Japan. The
anonymous author of the article told of the thoroughness with
which the Japanese Government investigated Freemasonry. "Nothing
has been left undone or unseen by them within the capabilities of
those in charge," he said.

It was also noted that the "innermost secrets of the confidential
files" of the Craft in Japan were taken by the government
authorities.

Concluding, the article stated:

"... it behooves all of us first to gain victory and then to bear
in mind the significance of that great legend so well known-Ordo
Ab Chao." 

The words "Ordo Ab Chao" mean Order From Chaos, and are the motto
of the Scottish Rite's 33rd degree.

A book titled, On The World Wide Secret Society, written by Jiro
Imai, assistant professor of literature at Tokyo Imperial
University, said that Freemasonry "was a most dangerous and
subversive secret society." In reply, Dr. Sazkuzo Yoshino wrote
that "the League of Nations was created with the genuine spirit
of Freemasonry."

Nevertheless, the International Rotary Club of Japan "was ordered
dissolved as an outer organ of Freemasonry." Also, Rotarians
faced charges by Army officers that the organization had received
secret orders for the destruction of the counuy, and were sending
information to their enemies. The Japanese Rotarians were further
accused of conspiring with Freemasonry against Japan's national
policies."

Boy Scouts, too, were declared an arm of Freemasonry. 

However, the status of Masons, Rotarians and Boy Scouts were
changed dramatically with the defeat of Japan in World War II.

General Douglas MacArthur, Supreme Commander in Japan, informed
George M. Saunders, 33rd Degree, Imperial Recorder of the Shrine
of North America, that the Occupational Government under
MacArthur was molded on the precepts of Freemasonry. 

The five-star General recommended to the Masonic Supreme Council
that his aide, Major Michael Rivisto, be named deputy in Japan.
And so it was done: Rivisto became the first Master of the Tokyo
Lodge.

Count Tsuneo Matsudaira, former President of the House of
Councillors, said he knew Masonry very well. He added: "Japanese
misunderstanding and prejudice toward Freemasonry was one of the
main causes of the last war."

The Japanese official said further that Freemasonry "will
undoubtedly be a social revolution in Japan."

One member of the Fraternity, after noting that General
MacArthur, a 33rd Degree Mason, had reopened Masonic lodges in
Japan, commented:

"Most of the Generals of the Occupation and many men of lesser
rank who were in key positions were Masons. The Japanese have
since concluded that Masonry had some connection with the success
of the Occupation."

Moreover, the Sovereign Grand Commander of the Scottish Rite
pointed out that all except one successor to General MacArthur as
Far East Commander were "all active masons and members of the
Scottish Rite." Those officers were Generals Matthew Ridgeway,
Mark Clark, John Hull and Lyman Lemnitzer.


11/HOW IT'S DONE


Some men gravitate naturally to Freemasonry because of its
Gnosticism and commitment to revolution, but the vast majority
are attracted to the fraternity by its external glitter.

The Lure

The following item in the New York Times typifies the favorable
publicity which surrounds meetings of the Shriners-the so-called
"fun-loving" adjunct of Masonry which is open only to men who are
Knights Templar or who have received the 32nd degree in a
Scottish Rite consistory.

KANSAS CITY, MO., July 5 (UPI)-Arab sheiks swished in flowing
robes, Keystone Kops cavorted on tricycle-sized motor scooters,
the cavalry chased the Indians, trumpeters tooted, horses pranced
and motorcycles chugged-craziness prevailed on the downtown
streets today. 

The Shriners are well known for their ability to evoke laughter
and spread happiness among young and old. They also are
universally admired and respected for sponsoring hospitals which
specialize in caring for children.

My own experience at a 1965 Shriner's parade in Washington, D. C.
left my wife and me so impressed by the Arab sheiks, Keystone
Kops, marching bands, clowns and choirs-and the immense joy and
pleasure they all brought to our small children-that we were
strongly persuaded to believe the Catholic Church's age-old
condenmation of the Masonic Fraternity, must certainly be
misguided.

Consequently, it was shocking later to learn that behind the
festive facade and the children's charities lurked a more
profoundly selfish purpose. Adam Weishaupt suggested the reason
for such activities neady 200 years ago when he instructed his
Illuminees

"We must win the common people in every corner. This will be
obtained chiefly by means of the schools, and to open, hearty
behaviour. Show condescension, popularity, and toleration of
their prejudices, which we, at leisure, shall root out and
dispel."

In 1945, a member of the Craft put it this way: "the major job of
the Masonic Fraternity is the creation of a healthy and
enlightened public opinion." And, he added: All other Masonic
activities are "incidental" to the real purpose of Freemasonry,
which is "the creation and maintenance of a public opinion that
will sustain the kind of world that we all wish to live in."

Public relations activities are the life-blood of Masonry,
because the Craft's policy ostensibly forbids extending
invitations to join the Fraternity. Rather, men who are attracted
to the Craft must themselves request entry into the Lodge. This
claim is often true, but it is well known that the Fraternity
frequently expends considerable effort to invite persons of rank
and distinction to accept entrance into the Secret Brotherhood.
Two such trophies bagged by the Brotherhood were President
William Howard Taft, and General Douglas MacArthur. They are
typical examples of prominent individuals who were made Masons
"by sight; that is, they did not request entry into the
Fraternity, the Brotherhood imposed itself upon them, and
elicited their consent to be identified with the Craft.

In 1968, the Scottish Rite Grand Commander clearly explained the
technique for luring men into the Fraternity. He said Masons are
"bound by age-old policies and traditions to refrain from
inviting or making a direct appeal to individuals to apply for
membership." So, to incite a desire to join the Craft, the
Brotherhood must attract attention to the organization "in such a
way" that the profane will initiate inquiries "as to how they
might . . . become Masons."

Continuing, the Masonic chieftain said "tact, diplomacy, and
skillful salesmanship will bring opportunities." In that regard,
he mentioned a Masonic film, "In The Hearts Of Men," which had
impressed many profane [i.e., non-Masons] by the number of
"distinguished Americans [who] were Masons." Commenting further,
the Grand Commander said:

"Crippled children's hospitals throughout the country, and the
knowledge that Masons are largely responsible for them, has
induced many outsiders to petition for the degrees of Masonry.
The same can be said about education programs of the Supreme
Council in support of the public schools and Americanism." 

And he added: "It comes down to this: Responsible citizens of the
United States want to help causes and institutions that are
unselfishly working for the good of our country and humanity."

Pressing home the need for luring men into the Fraternity, the
Commander said the Brethren must be "recognized as strong
advocates of Masonic participation" in such publicly accepted
entities "as public schools, scouting, youth organizations, YMCA,
Salvation Army, and libraries."

Albert Pike placed in perspective how the Fraternity uses Masons
who are nationally prominent public figures. He wrote: "Masons do
not build monuments to [George] Washington , and plume themselves
on the fact that he was a Mason merely on account of his Masonic
virtues. It is because his civic reputation sheds glory upon the
Order." 

Professor Renner, one of the Marianen Academy scholars who gave a
written deposition about his knowledge of the Illuminati, said
the Order bound adepts by subduing their minds "with the most
magnificent promises, and assure . . . the protection of great
personages ready to do everything for the advancement of its
members at the recommendation of the Order."

Moreover, the professor said, the Order (which, incidentally has
much in common with modern Freemasonry) enticed into its lodges
only those who could be useful: "Statesmen . . . counsellors,
secretaries . . . professors, abbes, preceptors, physicians, and
apothecaries are always welcome candidates to the Order."

Although the Craft popularized the phrase, "Brotherhoad of Man
Under the Fatherhood of God," in reality, it "was never intended
for the multitude." 

Masons who believe the Craft is a "social and fraternal order,"
are operating under an "erroneous impression," and become "a
distinct liability" to the Fraternity. 

It is truly surprising that thousands of men are lured into
joining an organization about which they know almost nothing.
Advertising experts call it "selling the sizzle and not the
steak."

A 1950 New Age editorial remarked on the phenomenon by observing
that the applicant for membership in the Craft "does not know in
advance the vows he must take or the principles to which he will
pledge allegiance. Yet, in spite of such a handicap, hundreds of
person every year make application to join a Masonic Lodge." 

Why do they do so? The editorial explains that the major reason
is because a man's acquaintances and friends are members of the
Fraternity, "and, if they have found Masonry in accordance with
its reputation for good in the conununity, then he feels
justified in the faith that nothing will be asked of him which
could not be proclaimed to the world with property." 

But the editorial did not find it necessary to report that, once
inside, the initiates are bound by solemn oaths, and stern
promises of mutilation and death if they reveal Masonic secrets.
However, even if the Brotherhood's secrets are revealed, they are
dismissed as untrue by the general public, because so many
honorable men are associated with the Fraternity. 

But what are the Fraternity's secrets? Why must members bind
themselves so solenmly and agree to accept mutilation and death
if the secrets are revealed? If the organization is simply
fraternal, charitable and undedicated to good works, surely such
extreme measures are totally uncalled for. 

The obvious conclusion is that the Secret Brotherhood is hiding
something so serious that decent men would never join it if they
were fully informed in advance of its activities and purposes.

Targeting The Candidates

Masons obviously are very choosy about who makes up the
"Brotherhood of Man" in the lodge rooms across the world. Craft
leaders insist that it is "very important" for its investigating
committees to scrutinize those who seek admission into the
Fraternity. It is particularly important to determine the
"religious views" of the candidates, as well as their "habits,
associates, how they spend [their] leisure time, and whether
[they are] financially able to become a Mason."  

As part of the selection process, the candidate is personally
interviewed by the investigative committee in the presence of his
wife, in order to "ascertain that the financial condition of the
family is such" that the man will be able to pay dues to the
Craft without financial strain. 

Masonic investigating conunittees check references provided by
the candidate, and make inquiries of his co-workers. Moreover,
Brothers who work in government law-enforcement agencies are
contacted, and usually "are extremely cooperative."

The Brotherhood's own investigating agency is known as the
Masonic Relief Association [MRA], "a great agency for information
concerning all types of investigations of the character of
individuals seeking the good offices of the Fraternity, and all
that is necessary is to make use of it . . ."

The Binding Oaths

Once the candidate has been lured or targeted, he is formally
initiated into the Fraternity amid occult signs and symbols of
the Mystery Religions and, incongruously, the Holy Bible. The
candidate for the Apprentice Degree, by direction, sinks to the
floor on his bared left knee, his right knee forming the angle of
a square. His left hand holds the Bible, square and compass, and
his right hand rests on those Masonic symbols. Now the candidate
proclaims in a loud voice before the Master of the Lodge and the
assembled Brethren:

"I. ____________, of my own free will and accord, in the presence
of Almighty God, and this Worshipful Lodge, erected to Him, and
dedicated to the holy Saints John, do hereby and hereon most
solenmly and sincerely promise and swear, that I will always
hail, ever conceal, and never reveal any of the arts, parts, or
points of the hidden mysteries of Ancient Free Masonry, which may
have been, or hereafter shall be, at this time, or any future
period, conununicated to me, as such, to any person or persons
whomsoever, except it be to a true and lawful brother Mason, or
in a regularly constituted Lodge of Masons; nor unto them until,
by strict trial, due examination, or lawful information, I shall
have found him, or them, as lawfully entitled to the same as I am
myself. I furthermore promise and swear that I will not print,
paint, stamp, stain, cut, carve, mark or engrave them, or cause
the same to be done, on any thing movable or immovable, capable
of receiving the least impression of a word, syllable, letter, or
character, whereby the same may become legible or intelligible to
any person under the canopy of heaven, and the secrets of Masonry
thereby unlawfully obtained through my unworthiness.

"All this I most solenmly promise and swear, with a firm and
steadfast resolution to perform the same, without any mental
reservation or secret evasion of mind whatever, binding myself
under no less penalty than that of having my throat cut across,
my tongue torn out by its roots, and my body buried in the rough
sands of the sea, at low water mark, where the tide ebbs and
flows twice in twenty-four hours, should I ever knowingly violate
this my Entered Apprentice obligation. So help me God, and keep
me steadfast in the due performance of the same." 

More than 150-years-ago, former President John Quincy Adams,
commenting on Freemasonry, said it was "vicious in its first
step, the initiation oath, obligation an penalty of the Entered
Apprentice" degree. He opposed the oaths because they are:
extra-judicial and contrary to the laws of the land; violate
Christ's precept to "swear not at all;" impose a commitment to
keep undefined secrets unknown to the person swearing the oath;
impose a penalty of death for violation of the oath; and
prescribe a mode of death that is "cruel, unusual and unfit for
utterance form human lips."

The Entered Apprentice oath is, of course, the first of many
oaths Masons voluntarily agree to utter. Moreover, the
punishments threatened become increasingly severe as the initiate
progresses through the various degrees.

From the outset, the new Mason learns that almost none of the
Craft's teachings originated with Christianity, but rather in
"China, four thousand years ago," and in the "priesthood of
ancient Egypt, and the Jews of the Captivity."

Repeatedly, his attention is directed toward the Mystery
Religions; to the fact that early man "found God in nature," and
is told of the ceremonies of ancient Egypt, the mysteries of
Eleusis, and the rites of Mithras. 

The nascent Mason immediately learns that the Masonic attraction
for the feast of St. John the Baptist (June 24), and St. John the
Evangelist (December 27) has nothing to do with Christianity, but
refer to the sununer and winter pagan festivals of the sun. 

He is subtly reminded to forget his early religious upbringing
because his initiation "is an analogy of man's advent from
prenatal darkness into the light of human fellowship, moral
truth, and spiritual faith. Masonic initiation, he is informed,
is an "opportunity for spiritual rebirth."

Again, the neophyte Mason is warned that he has become affiliated
with a strange organization which literally sets itself apart
from the rest of society. He is told the lodge "is a world unto
itself; a world within a world, different in its customs, its
laws, and its structure from the world without..."

One does not have to be elevated to the 32nd Degree to understand
that Masonry holds unique religious beliefs that are totally
contrary to conventional religion.

On pages 50 and 51 of his handbook, a thoughtful Apprentice Mason
will understand that Man is God. This is made clear as the
booklet develops the thought that beautiful stone statues are
created simply by knocking away with hammer and chisel the stone
that is not needed from the statue that was in the rock "all the
time." He is reminded: "The kingdom of heaven is within you," and
man "is made in the image of God." In the very next sentence the
new Mason is instructed to recall the analogy of the sculpted
statue, which is produced simply by "a process of taking away" to
reveal the "perfection . . . already within."

A moment's serious thought will tell the Apprentice Craftsman
that the Grand Architect who shapes the Universe is not God of
the Old and New Testaments, but MAN-"the perfect man and Mason,"
who, until he was shaped from a "rough stone" to become a
"perfect stone," had concealed his image as God by the
excresencees of religious beliefs and familial and national
loyalties. Heaven is not above, it is within the Masonic man ,
who , has the ability to create Heaven on earth.

As he moves up the Masonic ladder, the candidate for the Second
(Fellow Craft) Degree makes the following commitment:

". . . binding myself under no less penalty than of having my
breast torn open, my heart plucked out, and placed on the highest
pinnacle of the temple there to be devoured by the vultures of
the air, should I ever knowingly violate the the Fellow Craft
obligation . . . " 

In the Third Degree (Master Mason), the candidate is threatened

". . . under no less penalty than that of having my body severed
in two, my bowels taken from thence and burned to ashes, the 
ashes scattered before the four winds of heaven, that no more
remembrance might be had of so vile and wicked a wretch as l
would be, should I ever knowingly violate this my Master Mason's 
obligations. . ."

The Master Elect of the Fifteen (Tenth Degree) says:

". . . I consent to have my body opened perpendicularly, and to
be exposed for eight hours in the open air, that the venomous
flies may eat of my entrails, my head to be cut off and put on
the highest pinnacle of the world, and I will always be ready to
inflict the same punishment on those who shall disclose this
degree and break this obligation . . ." 

The Knight Kadosh (30th) Degree symbolizes the Fraternity's
raging battle against Church and State. The Grand Master
approaches a table on which are three skulls. One is adorned with
a papal tiara, a second wears a regal crown, and the third is
festooned with a laurel wreath. The Grand Master stabs the skull
with the papal tiara, as the candidate repeats: "Down with
Imposture! Down with crime!" The Master and the candidate then
kneel before the skull adorned with the laurel leaf and say:
"Everlasting glory to the immortal martyr of virtue." Passing to
the crowned skull, the pair chant: "Down with tyranny! Down with
crime!"

The candidate takes a second oath to "strive unceasingly . . .
for the overthrow of superstition, fanaticism, imposture and
intolerance."

He takes a third oath in which he accepts and consents "to
undergo the sentence which may be pronounced against me by this
dreaded tribunal, which I hereby acknowledge as my Supreme
Judge."

The fourth oath taken as a Knight Kadosh focuses again on the
"cruel and cowardly Pontiff, who sacrificed to his ambition the
illustrious order of those Knights Templar of whom we are the 
true successors." Then all present trample upon the papal tiara,
as they shout: "Down with imposture."

In the 31st Degree, the candidate agrees that the Masonic ideal
of justice "is more lofty than the actualities of God."

The 32nd Degree teaches that "Masonry will eventally rule the
world." 

Symbolism

Early in their service to the Craft, the Brethren learn the art
of symbolism is crucial to carrying on the Fraternity's work in a
profane world. One Mason said all words used in Masonry are
symbolic , and the initiate must learn "the symbolic meaning of
true religion . . . of true philosophy, true morality and true
brotherhood." 

Another Craftsman said a full understanding of Masonic symbols
"can only be obtained by a study of Eastern
mysticism-Cabbalistic, Pythogorean, and such."

In 1968 the Brotherhood was informed:

"The symbolism of Masonry has many shades of interpretation which
each Mason must evaluate for himself in accordance with his own
individual nature. Masonic rituals are the `idioms' of an ancient
symbolic language, a language which expresses ideas, more so than
words. It is said the seven magical keys conceal the innermost
secrets of Freemasonry within the volume of Sacred lore upon the
Masonic altar. These sacred truths are variously interpreted by
different individuals within the Lodge.

". . . .Each Mason on the journey of exploring life through
Masonic Ritual finds his Truth.

   *  *  *

"The Freemason, the ritualist, is the all-inclusive manipulator
of nature's finer forces within himself.

"Freemasonry is much more than an exact ritual alone. It is also
an exact formula through which we together, but differently, may
be enabled to make progress, slowly but surely . . ."

One authority on the Fraternity said symbolism attracts the
Masonic candidate and fascinates the initiated. It trains Masons
to consider the existing institutions-religious, political and
social-as passing phases of human evolution. It also allows the
Craft to conceal its real purposes. 

Father Hermann Gruber noted that the Great Architect of the
Universe and the Bible are of utmost importance to the
Brotherhood, because symbols are explained and accepted by each
Mason according to his own understanding.

The official organ or Italian Masonry, for example, emphasized
the Great Architect as representing the revolutionary God of
Mazzini, the Satan of Carducci, God as the fountain of love, or
Satan, the genius of the good, not the bad. In reality, the
German Jesuit observed, Italian Masonry in those interpretations
was adoring the principle of Revolution. 

Typical of that revolutionary orientation within Masonry are the
initials I.N.R.I. Inscribed on the Crucifix above Christ's head,
they mean to the Cl@ristian: Jesus of Nazareth, King of the Jews.
But in Masonic symbolism they stavnd for Igne Natura Renovatur
Integra-Entire Nature Is Renovated By Fire. 

It is important to note also that a substantial portion of
Masonic communication is passed from "mouth to ear." As one
Craftsman observed: "One of the principai avenues for keeping
Masonry active is the manner of instruction from mouth to ear,
from generation to generation."

Masonry and the Media

Masonry obviously wields enormous influence in world media.
Historian Mildred Headings said Masons influenced at least 47
periodicals throughout France, off and on, during the late 19th
and early  20th Centuries. 

 
In the United States, in 1920, the Scottish Rite established a
news service for "furnishing accurate and gratuitous information
to newspapers. 

In 1924, the Grand Commander informed the activities of our state
organizations, the New Age Magazine, our clip service and News
Bureau, we are stimulating the public interest and furnishing
much valuable material to speakers and writers, and thereby can
reasonably claim much credit" for the growing interest in favor
of compulsory education by the state. 

Two years later, the Grand Commander was able to report to the
Brethren: ". . . it is safe to claim that the majority of daily
publications seem very friendly in their attitude toward the
Craft."

It was not only small town newspapers which looked with approval
on the Fraternity's activities. The New Age reported that "many
members of the National Press Club are Masons, not a few of them
very prominent Masons."

Also it was noted that a number of Christian Science officials
have been Masons, and the Christian Science Monitor "devotes
considerable space to Masonic activities throughout the world."
Indeed, during the 1930s, the Monitor ran a regular colunm
regarding Freemasonry's routine activities.

Prominent Masons in the media included: Charles P. Taft, founder
and publisher of the Cincinatti Times Star;  Roy W. Howard,
chairman of Scripps-Howard newspapers, United Press, and
Newspaper Enterprise Association (NEA); Ogden Reid, editor of the
New York Herald Tribune; Richard H. Amberg, publisher of the St.
Louis Globe Democrat; and James G. Stahlman, president of the
Nashville Banner. 
In 1987, The Wall Street Journal published an editorial
castigating Senator Patrick Leahy (D., Vt.) for questioning
Masonry's segregation on policies in connection with membership
in the Fraternity by a prospestive judicial candidate Judge David
Sentelle. The editorial stated:

"The problem is that Sen. Leahy's smoking gun is loaded with
blanks. One phone call could have told Sen. Leahy that the Masons
don't discriminate againist blacks. The Masonic Services
Association in Washington, D.C., says membership is open 'without
regard to race, color or religion: Blacks founded their own
lodges a century ago, but now many belong to predominately white
lodges, as Judge Sentelle said.

"The group also provides a membership list. This includes George
Washington, both Roosevelts, Harry Truman, a total of 15 of 40
presidents. Eight of nine justices who signed Brown v Board of
Education were Masons, including Earl Warren and William Douglas.
About 75 congressmen also belong, including liberal Sens. Robert
Byrd (W. Va. Mountain Lodge No. 156), Mark Hatfield Oregon
Pacific Lodge No. 50) and Arlen Specter (Pa. E. Coppe Mitchell
Lodge No. 605). 

The author wrote a letter to the Journal the next day to say the
editorial was "wide of the mark." The letter continued by making
the followving points:

"The fact is a basic Masonic `landmark' (which cannot be
repealed) stipulates that only men who are neither crippled,
slaves, nor born in slavery are eligible for membership in the
Masonic Fraternity. The latter criterion has excluded Negroes
from regular Masonry, and prompted them to form their own
'clandestine' branch, known as Prince Hall Masonry, to which
Justice Thurgood Marshall belongs."

The ietter also noted that the Senator's challenge must be an
historic first "or at least the first such legislative challenge
to Masonic philosophy since the early l9th century" when
committees of the legislatures of New York, Pennsylvania and
Massachusetts found Masonry to be a distinct threat to both
government and religion.

It also was observed that similar findings have been published
over 200 times by various Popes beginning in 1738. Moreover, the
letter recalled that many other Christian denominations have
similarly indicted Freemasonry, as has Scotland Yard. In
conclusion, The letter said:

"Indeed, between 1941-1971, the Supreme Court was dominated by
Masons in ratios ranging from 5 to 4 (1941-1946; 1969- 1971) to 8
to 1 (1949-1956). During that 30-year-period, the Court erected
"a wall" separating things religious from things secular. It was
an epoch when prayer and Bible reading were derascinated from
public education and when decision after decision succeeded in
prohibiting any State financial assistance to religious schools.

"Despite the facade of prominent national personalities who are
boasted of by the Craft, as well as parades, circuses and
hospitals , Masons have succeeded in having their religion
dominate American society."

Although the letter contained information that is little known to
the public at large, it was never published; however, its receipt
at the Journai was acknowledged privately to the writer.

Almost two months later, The Washington Times ran an "op-ed"
piece on the same subject, which argued in support of Masonry
along lines almost identical to the position set forth earlier by
the Journal. The article was written by a man named Blair
Dornmey, a Washington, D.C. attorney and free-lance writer who
was identified as a nonMason. 

On the very day the article appeared, this writer sent a letter
to editor of the Times to make (more briefly) the same points as
were made in response to the Journal's editorial. Again, although
receipt of the letter was acknowledged, it was never published. 

Of course, editors are free to choose which letters to print, but
it seems strange that both the Journal and the Times base their
arguments largely on what a Masonic organization says about its
own Fraternity, and fail to report the known history of the
Brotherhood or facts set forth in counter arguments which are
readily verifiable.

And so men are attracted to Masonry by its favorable public image
and by knowing they are Brothers with Presidents, statesmen,
justices, Congressmen, Senators, prime ministers, generals,
admirals, captains of industry, journalists and other shapers and
molders of history. Yet, some become disillusioned and separate
themselves from the Craft, only to find Masons often "retaliate
against members who quit by trying to get them fired from their
jobs and otherwise harassing them." Several former members of the
Fraternity said they moved from their residences after leaving
the lodge, and some asked that their names not be used by
newspaper reporters because they feared reprisals."

One former Mason called attention to the oath of a Master Mason,
which says in part:

"I furthermore promise and swear that I will not cheat, wrong or
defraud a Lodge of Master Masons, or a brother of this degree . .
. I swear that I will not violate the chastity of a Master
Mason's wife, his mother, sister or daughter, knowing them to be
such . . ."

Anokan Reed, a former top-level York Rite Mason pointed to the
morality of such oath by commenting: "It's OK to seduce another
man's daughter, or steal his car, as long as he's not a Master
Mason . . . In the higher degrees, Masons deny the reality of
evil."

Reed, a former 13th Degree York Rite member, said he joined a
lodge in Kokomo, Indiana when he was in his 20s, because his
boss, a Mason, guaranteed he would "move up in the steel mill" if
he joined. After becoming a Mason, Reed was promoted to a
supervisory position, for which, he admits, he was not qualified.

The former York Rite Mason moved from Kokomo to@ avoid harassment
after being expelled from the Fraternity for challenging the
Craft's secrecy. 

Masonry And Politics

Writing of Freemasonry's dominance of the public life of France
during the Third Republic (1870-1940), historian Mildred
Headings, said the Fraternity established a firm and determined
policy that nothing should occur in that country "without the
hidden, secret participation of Masonry."

With that goal in mind, the Craft made a concerted effort to have
as many Masons as possible in parliament, the ministries, and in
other official capacities. As a result, "the public power, the
national power [was] directed by Masons."

To demonstrate the political power of Masonry in France during
that period, Ms. Headings noted that in 1912, for example, 300 of
the 580 members of the House of Deputies (52.7 percent) were
Freemasons, as were 180 of 300 Senators (60 percent). 

What of the United States? The preceding pages of this book have
disclosed how Masonry dominated public policy in a number of
individual States, and, nationally, through the Nativist,
Know-Nothing, APA, and Ku Klux Klan Movements. But if Masonic
dominance of the national legislature is used as a criterion for
the strength of Freemasonry in France, the same criterion applied
to Masonic membership in the United States Congress shows the
Fraternity's control of public life on this side of the Atlantic
has been much more pronounced than in France.

In 1923, for example, 300 of 435 members of the U.S. House of
Representatives (69 percent) were members of the Craft, as were
30 of 48 members of the U.S. Senate (63 percent). Six years
later, 67 percent of the entire U.S. Congress was comprised of
members of the Masonic Brotherhood. 

Although Masons continued to hold a dominant position in the
House and Senate in 1941, their proportion of the total
membership dropped to 53 percent in the Senate and 54 percent in
the House. In 1957, a "typical" member of the 85th Congress was a
Mason. 

Subsequently, Congressional membership in the Masonic Fraternity
seemed to be less pronounced, so that by 1984, for instance, only
14 Senators (14 percent) identified themselves as members of the
Craft, as did 51 House members. 

Those figures, however, are not entirely accurate, because some
public figures do not always announce their membership in the
Craft. Typical of such coy Masons in public life is Congressman
Jack F. Kemp (R., N.Y). The former football star and Presidential
candidate does not list his Masonic affiliation in the
biographical sketch he provided for the 1983-1984 Official
Congressional Directory; nor does it appear in the routine
curriculm vitae handed out by his office. However, the Buffalo
News reported in 1986 that Rep. Kemp is "a member of Fraternal
Lodge, F&AM, in Hamburg, New York; a member of Palmoni Lodge of
Perfection, 14th Degree; Palmoni Council, Princes of Jerusalem,
16th Degree; Buffalo Chapter of Rose Croix, 18th Degree; and
Buffalo Consistory, 32nd Degree." In September, 1987, the Supreme
Council of the Scottish Rite of the Northern Jurisdiction singled
him out to receive the 33rd Degree of that Rite in Boston in
September, 1987. 

But it has not been the Legislative Branch alone in the United
States which has been subjected to strong Masonic influence. The
Craft's control of the Supreme Court already has been explored;
and although Masonry's authority has not been as pronounced in
the Executive Branch as in the two others, the secret Brotherhood
has had good representation among Chief Executives Fifteen of 39
Presidents have been members of the  Craft,some of whom have been
more ardent in their attachment to the Fraternity than others.

In addition to George Washington and Andrew Johnson, among more
recent Presidents who have been Masons are Franklin D. Roosevelt,
Harry S. Truman, Lyndon B. Johnson and Gerald R. Ford.

Of Roosevelt, the Grand Lodge of New York remarked in its
official publication that if world Masonry ever comes into being,
historians will give much credit to the period when Franklin
Delano Roosevelt was President. 

President Harry Truman, a Past Grand Master of the Grand Lodge of
Missouri, was quoted as saying: "Although I hold the highest
civil honor in the world, I have always regarded my rank and
title as a Past Grand Master of Masons as the greatest honor that
has ever come to me."

Following President Truman's death in 1972, the Scottish Rite
Grand Commander hailed the Missouri-born Chief Executive as "a
devoted son" of the Fraternity, and "the first President of the
United Statss to have been coroneted an Inspector General
Honorary of the Thirty-third Degree (1945)."

Masons serving in Cabinet posts under President Roosevelt were
Henry Morganthau, Secretary of the Treasury; Homer Cummings and
Robert H. Jackson (later a Supreme Court Justice), Attorneys-
General; Daniel Roper and Jesse Jones, Secretaries of Commerce;
George Dern, Secretary of War; and Claude Swanson and Frank Knox,
Secretaries of Navy.

Among Masons in President Truman's Cabinet were James F. Byrnes
and George C. Marshall, Secretaries of State; Tom Clark, Attorney
General (and later Supreme Court Justice); Fred Vinson, Secretary
of Treasury (and later Chief Justice); Louis Johnson, Secretary
of Defense; Clinton Anderson, Secretary of Agriculture; and Henry
Wallace, Secrtary of Commerce. Mr. Wallace also served as Vice
President during Franklin D. Roosevelt's third term.

During World War II, under both Presidents Roosevelt and Truman
the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General George C.
Marshall; the Commander of the U.S. Fleet, Admiral Ernest King;
and the Chief of the U.S. Army Air Corps, General Henry H.
Arnold-were all members of the Masonic Fraternity.

Freemasons serving under President Dwight D. Eisenhower (a
non-Mason) were Sherman Adams, his Chief of Staff; Christian
Herter, Secretary of State; Douglas McKay, Secretary of Interior;
and Robert B. Anderson, Secretary of Treasury. 

The Fraternity's Disguised Power

It must be emphasized that many members of the Fraternity do not
disclose their Masonic affiliation, as Congressman Kemp's
curriculum vitoe indicates. That aspect of the Craft's operations
was made clear in a 1962 New Age editorial, which said:

"That a man is a Mason is something only another Mason can know,
and the secret of the Master Mason can be simply and subtly
communicated amongst eavesdroppers without the slightest
awareness of non-Masons. [It] is [part of] the continuing and
ancient charm of the age-old rituals and rites."

The same editorial said: "Masons set the basic policies of our
society. Yet the order is not political, and its purposes are not
public. It is religious . . ."

And one member of the Craft pointed out that there are at least
160 organizations (which he did not identify) that require their
members to also be initiates into the Masonic Fraternity. 

In 1948, the New Age boasted that some ten million adults were
linked directly, or were indirectly associated with the nation's
three million Master Masons. The Scottish Rite publication
estimated that "between one in five and one in 10 of the adult
thinking population come directly within the circle of Masonic
influence . . ."

A candid statement on Masonry's dedication to imposing its
philosophy on the nation, often through men who hold positions of
national leadership, was set forth two years later by a
high-ranking member of the Brotherhood. He said:

"Any teaching which is completely antagonistic to all that we
consider sacred, in religion, in morals and in government, is
subversive of those fundamentals, and on them we depend for our
very existence as a Craft. Our first duty, therefore, becomes one
of self preservation, which includes defense of those principles
for which we stand and by which we live. This duty cannot be
discharged by complete silence on the subject, and this view,
it is encouraging to note, is today shared byv most of those who
speak Masonically in the United States."

Significantly, the writer concluded by noting that some men who
were leading the nation at that time were also "leaders of the
Craft." He declared :

"This nation was nurtured on the ideals of Freemasonry; . . .
most of those who are today its leaders are also members and
leaders of the Craft. They know that our American Democracy, with
its emphasis on the inalienable rights and liberties of the
individual, is Freemasonry in Government . . ."

Perhaps typical of how leaders of the Craft work within the
government was the cancelation in 1955 by the Senate Judiciary
Committee of a hearing to openly explore and discuss the real
meaning of the relgion clause of the First Amendment. It is
possible such a hearing might have been considered discussion of
a teaching which is completely antagonisitic to all that consider
sacred."

At any rate, the New Age reported that the Senate committee had
announced in August that it would commence hearings on the
religion clause of the First Amendment beginning October 3. The
Masonic publication also made clear that it was opposed to such
hearings. Subsequendy, the magazine reported: "On September 30,
hasty announcement was made by the Chairman of the subcommittee,
Sen. Thomas C. Hennings, Jr. , of Missouri, that public hearings
on the religion clause would be postponed."

The late Sen. Hennings was a 33rd Degree Mason. 

In 1960, the Grand Commander related how the federal government
was used to help consolidate two lodges in Italy into one Supreme
Council. The situation developed as a result of Italian dictator
Benito Mussolini taking over the Masonic Temple in Rome.
Following his assassination, the Temple's ownership passed to the
Italian government, a transaction upheld by Italian courts. The
courts also ruled that the Italian Masons owed 100 miiiion lire
in interest and back rent.

U.S. Masons organized American Friends for Justice for Italian
Freemasonry, under the leadership of Admiral William H. Standley.
A deadline for payment of the 100 million lire was set for
February 18, 1960; however, "a sympathetic hearing" was given to
the U.S. Masons by Secretary of State Christian Herter, a 33rd
Degree Mason," and the deadline was extended 90 days. Moreover,
while the Temple remained in the possession of the Italian
government, Masons were given the right to certain portions of
the building for 20 years , beginning in July, 1960. The 100
million lire debt was reduced by fourfifths, so the Craft was
required to pay only 20 million at the rate of 1 million per year
for two decades. 

Secretary Herter received the Gourgas Medal of Masonry, which is
awarded by the Fraternity "in recognition of notably
distinguished service in the cause of Freemasonry, humanity or
country."

In 1976, the Grand Commanders of the Scottish Rite bodies of the
Southern and Northern Jurisdictions honored a number of the
Masonic Congressmen. During the ceremonies it was made clear that
"much credit must go to the Brethren in governmental positions."
It was also stated "that good, dedicated, patriotic men can
determine the fate of a nation and contribute to the fulfillment
of Freemasonry 's high ideals."

Among the Fraternity's "high ideals" is prohibiting government
support to children attending religious educational institutions.
In that regard, a Washington newspaper colunm ran two items which
were separated in time by eight months, but clearly reflect how
Masonry's agenda can be acomplished within the government even if
the President of the United States seems to hold a contrary view.

The unsigned colunm, "Alice in Potomac Land," reported on April
5, 1983:

"Not many lobbyists have the ability to alter public policy like
Timmons and company. Its top dogs, Bill Timmons and Tom
Korologos, are not only veterans of the Nixon/Ford
Administrations, but also helped the Reaganites in the 1980
campaign. They have the luxury of picking and choosing their
clients. So, when they move into the area of family issues, you
you that more is afoot than a [Sen.] Jesse Helms filibuster . . .

"And then word reached us that Timmons has been using his old
contacts at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue to bring about a meeting
between President Reagan and Henry Clausen, the head of the
Masonic Order. The purpose of the chat is to talk the Old Man out
of his support for tuition tax credits, which the Masons
adamantly oppose. "

Just over eight months later, on December 13, 1983, the same
column ran the following item:

"Those folks who were active in the fight for tuition tax credits
said all along that White House legislative affairs director Ken
Duberstein didn't have his heart in the struggle, even though his
boss, the President was leading the charge. Now they think they
know why.

Mr. Duberstein is leaving the administration to join Timmons and
Co., the high-powered lobbying firm. Conservatives feel that Mr.
Duberstein was so intent on moving out of government into the big
bucks that he didn't want to risk his marketability by twisting
arms for conserative causes." 

The Military And Masonry

The Masonic Fraternity has been working within military units for
many years. The officer cadre of Masonry in the armed forces is
known as the Sojourners Club. 

However, the Craft recognizes that secret organizations
uncontrolled by the military itself are not looked upon favorably
by military commanders. In that regard, one Craftsman noted that
lodges have been closed "owing to the disapproval of military
authorities." 

The same source suggested one method of enhancing acceptance of a
Masonic lodge within the military is to appoint officials, such
as regimental commanders, as First Masters of Regimental Lodges. 

An example of penetrating military organizations with Masonic
philosophy was discussed in a 1945 New Age editorial. The item
concerned the California College in China, formerly of Peiping,
but operating in "exile" in California. The editor said:

"This is one of the educational institutions to the support of
which the Supreme Council Southern Jurisdiction contributes. W.B.
Pettus, 33rd Degree, who is connected with the college, writes:
'Many of us in California College in China do not forget . . .
that our college Foundation here in this state really had its
beginning in the Scottish Rite Temple in Los Angeles'."

The editorial continued by noting the "wartime object" of the
College:

". . .it is important that the officers of the Army and Marine
Corps should be trained for their service in the Far East in
institutions guided by similar principles which accord with those
things for which our Scottish Rite stands. This is true of
California College in China, and I am glad that during 1945 we
are to be training some 360 officers of the Army, and a
comparable number of Intelligence officers of the Marine Corps."

Another sobering 1968 report concerned a group of 17 West Point
graduates who, one month before being commissioned second
lieutenants, were "obligated" as "soldier Masons . . . to carry
out our [i.e., Masonry's] ideals in Vietnam."

The ceremony of obligation was attended by 457 people (135 had to
be turned away), and the principal speaker was Lt. General Herman
Nickerson, 33rd Degree, Chief of Staff for Manpower and Director
of Personnel of the U. S. Marine Corps. 

The report gave no indication whether "Masonry's ideals in
Vietnam" were the same as those of the United States. For an
organization that has long been identified as "a State within the
State," a fomenter of revolutions, and the successor-custodian of
the Mystery Religions, it was a rather significant omission.


AFTERWORD

America has lost its way.

And it has done so, as the preceding pages have documented,
through the determined and protracted efforts of an international
secret society which has largely operated as "a state within a
state."

The late historian Christopher Dawson wrote: "The great
civilisations of the world do not produce the great religions as
a kind of byproduct; in a very real sense, the great religions
are the foundations on which the great civilisations rest. 

To a great extent, the United States, in its art and
architecture, its morals and music, and in its national and
foreign policies, impresses many as a civilization in decline.
And the argument is here made that this is happening because the
fundamental Christian ethic which shaped the nation is being
rapidly eroded. The body politic is largely sustained by the
lingering fragrance of an abandoned Faith.

But the record shows the vast majority of the American people did
not voluntarily abandon their Christian vitality: it was taken
away them by a series of artificially grounded decisions
concerning the religion clause of the First Amendment at a time
when the Court was dominated by Justices who were Freemasons.

One of those men, Justice Hugo L. Black, was a member not only of
the militantly anti-Catholic and anti-Christian Masonic Order,
but of its adjunct, the notorious Ku Klux Klan.

Moreover, he is known to have expressed his interest in
"advancing liberal religion," could "not tolerate any sign of
encouraging religious faith by state aid," and initiated a
campaign to have the Masonic Fraternity support legislation which
would aid public schools only. 

The Masonic Fraternity immersed itself in a relentless attack on
government practices which suggested minimal accommodation of
traditional religions. The Craft did so by by bringing before the
courts case after case challenging these various aspects of
minimal State toleration of and cooperation with traditional
religious practices. It was Supreme Court decisions on those
cases which eroded the Christian patina that was a hallmark of
the United States.

The evidence set forth in this book has only scratched the
surface of the Masonic iceberg which threatens the bark of Peter
and the Ship of State.

The remarkable thing is the State-which is mandated to "insure
domestic tranquility . . . promote the general welfare, and
secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our
posterity"-has been seriously derelict in challenging Masonic
rule in America.

Repeatedly, the Masonic Fraternity has been found to be dangerous
to Church and State. These findings have been made and publicized
by numerous Popes, heads of State, several legislatures, various
church denominations, and Scotland Yard. Yet, the United States
Government which has the authority and the ability to investigate
this secret world-wide organization-an anachronism in a free and
open society-has studiously failed to investigate the Craft or to
question its initiates who serve in key positions in government.

In 1921, a leading newspaper, The World (New York), after
concluding a 20-part series on the danger of the Ku Klux Klan
(which was closely identified with Masonry) worried about the
Klan's secret oath, an oath which demanded "unconditional
obedience to the as yet unknown constitution and laws,
regulations. . . . of the Knights of the Ku Klux Klan."

The newspaper also was disturbed by the "rigid secrecy" imposed
on Klan members "even in the face of death."

The World said it "has always in mind the potential danger to the
United States from a secret organization bound together by such
an oath . . . and likely to draw into its ranks men of [sic] no
regard for anything but the Ku Klux law and standards of conduct
and ethics." 

  
The Fact is, Freemasonry also has secret, blood-curdling oaths,
and demands of its initiates "unconditional obedience to the as
yet unknown constitution and laws, regulations" of the Craft.

Almost immediately after that article appeared, the Rules
Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives conducted several
days of hearings on the activities of the Klan, at which The
World's editor was the first witness. However, the hearings were
suddenly concluded following a proposal by a member of Congress
to investigate all secret societies which, of course, would have
included the Freemasons.

In 1923, the State of New York approved a statute which said, in
part, every membership corporation and association, "having a
membership of twenty or more persons, which corporation or
association requires an oath as a a prerequisite or condition of
membership . . . shall file . . . a sworn copy of its
constitution, by-laws, rules, regulations and oath of membership,
together with a roster of its membership and a list of its
officers for the current year . . ."

Another section of the same law stipulated that any person who
joined such a group or remained a member, with knowledge that the
entity "failed to comply with any provisions of this article,
shall be guilty of a misdemeanor."

The Freemasons, Grand Army of the Republic, the Odd Fellows (a
Masonic adjunct) and the Knights of Columbus were exempt from the
legislation.

The Klan, of course, objected to the law. They argued that the
statuts deprived them of liberty, under the due process clause,
in that it prevented them from exercising their right of
membership and association.

The Court responded that "membership in the association . . ,
must yield to the rightful exertion of the police power."

Continuing, the Court said: "There can be no doubt that under
that power, the State may prescribe and apply to associations
having an oath-bound membership any reasonable regulation
calculated to confine their purposes and activities within limits
which are consistent with the rights of others and the public
welfare."

The information mandated by the law to be furnished "will operate
as an effective or substantial deterrent from the violations of
public and private right to which the association might be
tempted if such a disclosure were not required." 

Regarding the requirement that the Klan register and have its
activities examined, the Court said the State "May direct its law
against what it deems the evil as it actually exists without
covering the whole field of possible abuses."

As for specifically excluding the Masons and Knights of Columbus,
the Court said: "These organizations and their purposes are well
known, many of them having been in existence for many years. Many
of them are oath-bound and secret. But we hear no complaints
against them regarding violation of the peace or interfering with
the rights of others."

Of course, the secret work of Masonry is not at all "well known,"
but the long history of complaints against it by such respected
sources as numerous Popes, heads of State and various
legislatures should suggest that a thorough investigation of the
Craft clearly is in order.

In a minority opinion in the New York Supreme Court's Appellant
Division, Judge Davis noted that the Masons are "bitterly
assailed and charged with all sorts of crimes and delinquencies;"
but that "natural moderation and good sense" prevailed, and "no
legislation was required in the interest of public safety or
welfare to suppress" Masonry.

At the same time, Judge Davis conceded that there "can be no
doubt that societies having principles subversive to the
government or peace and good order may be banned and their
members forbidden to meet."

This book has offered substantial data which demonstrate that
Masonry is a society "having principles subversive to the
government or peace and good order" of the nation and of those
citizens who wish to freely exercise their religion.

Scottish Rite Masonry's Grand Philosopher, Albert Pike, in his
magnum opus, Morals and Dogma-which is given to each initiate
into the Fourth Degree-makes this statement:

"Masonry teaches that the Present is our scene of action, and the
Future for speculation and trust . . . [Man] is sent into this
world not to be constantly hankering after dreaming of, preparing
for another . . .

"The Unseen cannot hold a higher place in our affections than the
Seen and the Familiar . . .

"Those only who have a deep affection for this world will work
resolutely for its amelioration. Those who under-value this life
naturally become querulous and discontented and lose their
interest in the welfare of their fellows . . .

"The earth, to the Mason, is both the starting place and goal of
immortality."

To indicate the type of mentality to which such a philosophy
apeals, it is instructive to read how closely Brother Pike's
sentiment was expressed some years later by a leader of another
sinister organization. That man said:

"We don't want people who keep one eye on the life in the
hereafter. We need free men who feel and know that God is in
themselves."

The later statement was made by Adolph Hitler. 

Obviously, the government, which alone has the ability to probe
deeply into Masonry, will never challenge the Craft, because many
members of Congress owe their seats to the Fraternity. However,
the public can do something to neutralize the one organization
that has lead the assault on the Christian religion, and has a
long history of involvement in fomenting discord, dissension and
revolution. Members of the public can-

-Conduct independent research into all aspects of Freemasonry by
reading books about the Craft; searching libraries, lodges,
attics, and government documents available through the Freedom of
Information Act.
-Make membership in the Masonic Fraternity a criterion for
assessing the qualifications and philosophy of candidates for
public office.
-Urge State legislators as well as Congressmen and Senators
to conduct public investigations of the Fraternity and expose its
oaths, penalties and purposes.
-Insist that "secret societies" be subjected to scrutiny and that
its records and membership be made available to the public.
-Demand to know why there must be "secrets" in an open society if
an organization is merely a charitable and fraternal group.

Of critical importance is prayer. "For our wrestling is not
against flesh and blood but against principalities and powers;
against rulers of the world of darkness; against the spirits of
wickedness in high places." (St. Paul's Letter to the Ephesians,
6: 12).


THE DEPTH OF GEORGE WASHINGTON'S MASONRY

Masons regularly allege that "the Father of our Country,"
President George Washington, was one of the most illustrious and
active members of the Craft. However, the historic record
indicates he only had tenuous ties to Masonry, probably because
it was a potent political force in the 18th Century.

The subject became an issue in the 1970s when the Disabled
American Veterans (DAV) distributed a booklet which stated that
the nation's first President was "not a very active" member of
the Fraternity. The DAV also suggested that Masonry attempts to
capitalize on Washington's nominal membership to bring
unwarranted merit to the international secret society.

The Grand Commander of the Scottish Rite of the Southern
Jurisdiction attempted to rebut the Veteran's position, but his
documentation, in reality, tended to confirm the DAV's charge.

The Scottish Rite chieftain noted that Washington became a
Freemason at the Fredericksburg, Virginia Lodge on August 4,
1753, and visited that lodge later the same year, and again in
1755.

However, the Grand Commander's record shvws that it was not until
1776-23 years later-that Washington participated in any Masonic
activity. At that time, he marched in a Masonic procession in
Philadelphia.

The following year, he celebrated "St. John's Day" with a
military lodge in New York, and did the same thing later that
year with a New Jersey military lodge.

[There are two "St. John's" Days. One ostensibly refers to St.
John the Baptist (June 24) , and the other, St. John the Apostle
and Evangelist (Dec. 27). Actually, in Masonry the days refer to
solar worship and represent the summner and winter solstices,
when the sun is at its greatest distance from the celestial
equator-a turning point.]

Continuing his catalogue of Washington's purported devotion to
the Masonic Fraternity, the Grand Commander cited brief visits by
the President to various lodges, and incidents when he simply
walked in Masonic processions on five separate occasions between
1781 and 1797.

It was also noted that numerous communications from Masons
proposed that Washington receive various awards and
commendations.

The Grand Commander called attention to the Alexandria, Virginia
Lodge receiving a painting of the First President executed by
William Williams of Philalelphia, on order of the Alexandria
Lodge, a portrait for which Washington sat.

With regard to that situation, the Founding Father, responding by
letter, dated July 3, 1792, to a request from Governor Henry Lee
of Virginia that the President sit for a portrait, Washington
said he was "heartily tired" of sitting for portraits, and had
"resolved to sit for no more of them . . . except in instances
where it has been requested by public bodies . . . and could not,
without offense, be refused."

Williams had been refused a sitting by Washington, and
subsequently offered the Alexandria Lodge the finished portrait
of the President if the Masons would request the President to sit
for the artist.

The Lodge approved the proposal on August 29, 1793, and the
portrait was completed at Philadelphia in September, 1794. It now
is proudly displayed by the Alexandria Lodge.

See: The Grand Commander's Message: "Exposing The Debunkers," New
Age, February, 1973, pp. 2-11.

The Writings of George Washington, op. cit., volume 32, p. 93,
note 59.

THE ANCIENT MYSTERIES


For more than one-thousand years, the Mystery Religions were
familiar in the ancient Mediterranean world. In the Graeco-Roman
region, they dominated from the invasion of the East by Alexander
the Great in 334 B.C. until Constantine, the first Christian
emperor, founded Constantinople in 327 A.D. 

These cults-of which Masonry is the modern day successor-were
predicated upon Gnosticism, a belief in a spurious "knowledge" of
the origin, control and destiny of the universe. This "knowledge"
supposedly originated in Egypt or Chaldea, and was handed down
through an ancient message transmitted secretly by a chain of
initiates. 

Th "mysteries" are for a select few, who were bound by solenm
oaths not to reveal the cult's rites, These religions were
strongly opposed by the early Church as "strange doctrines" and
"myths" that "come from the devils." In his First Letter to
Timothy, St. Paul urged the Church under his jurisdiction to have
"nothing to do with the pointless philosophical discussions and
antagonistic beliefs of the 'knowledge' [i.e., Gnosticism] which
is not knowledge at all."

Actually, as St. Paul noted in his Letter to the Colossians, the
"Mysteries" were distorted shadows of the the real "mystery"
hidden for the ages and generations: the reality of Christ, the
Redeemer and Savior promised long ago to mankind, who offers
salvation to all men who believe in Him [Col. 2:6-18].

Charles Heckethorn, in his penetrating analysis of secret
societies, noted that in prehistoric times man possessed a true
knowledge of nature and her workings. That is why the "mysteries'
of the most distant nations had so much in common. The common
knowledge among different races and peoples was transmated from a
common source. 

Heckethorn said this prehistoric knowledge "was gradually
distorted by perverse interpretations" and embroidered by
fanciful creations of man's brain. 

Originally, the sun, moon and stars were seen as outward
manifestations of the power of the Eternal Life. However, the
multitude was more interested in satisfying material wants and
"hence arose the personification of the heavenly bodies and
terrestrial seasons depending upon them." Gradually, the human
figure, which originally had been a symbol, came to be looked
upon as the representation of an individual being that had
actually lived upon earth. Thus was born Chrisna, Fo, Osiris,
Hermes, Hercules and other "divine" beings. 

In all the "mysteries" there was a superior being who suffers
death and recommences a more glorious existence. Everywhere there
is a grand event of mourning followed immediately by the most
lively joy. Moreover, the doctrine of the Unity and Trinity was
common to all ancient doctrines, as was the "prototype of the
Christian dogma in which a virgin is seen bringing forth a
Savior, and yet remaining a virgin." To the primitive people that
mystery is seen as Virgo in the Zodiac, and the "savior" brought
forth is the Sun 

Also, in all the "mysteries," light was represented as born out
of darkness-thus Kali, Isis, Ceres, Proserpine, represent the
night from whose bosom issues life , and into which the life
returns.

The cross, too, in all the mysteries, symbolized purification and
salvation. 

These various aspects of the "mystsries," as St. Paul noted,
particularly the common theme of a "Savior," demonstrate a faint
glimmering of the truth of Divine revelation which was revealed
by Jesus Christ. 

Another aspect of the "mysteries" included a requirement that
candidates for membership pass through seven caves or ascend
seven steps, or be transportedl through the seven planets-a theme
which is a reflected in modern Masonic initiations 

One Mason observed that the religious symbols painted upon the
walls and tombs of ancient Egypt tend to make a Freemason "almost
believe he is witnessing a scene at an initiation," as he notices
the apron, grips, signs, postures and symbols and other features
common to Masonic lodges so vividly displayed. 

Another member of the Craft said Sun worship "was the foundation
from which has been gradually elaborated the various mysteries
and cults which gave us Masonry as we find it today." 

This same source said the cults of Dionysus or Bacchus developed
from phallic worship. That cult held speculative and secret
opinion; of the unity of God and immortality of the soul. It also
had "signs and symbols and practices similar to those found in
Freemasonry . . ."

The Phrygians worshiped the Magna Mater (the Great Mother),
sometimes identified as Ma or Cybele, the fecund mother of al
things. In the wild orgies of worship associated with that
mystery religion, some devotees voluntarily wounded themselves
and, becoming intoxicated with the view of blood, with which they
sprinkled their altars, they believed they were uniting
themselves with their divinity, others sacrificed their virility
to the gods. 

St. Augustine wrote that, as a young man , he "took pleasure in
the shameful games which were celebrated in honor of the gods and
goddesses," including Cybele. On the day consecrated to her
purification, "there were sung before her couch productions so
obscene and filthy for the ear . . . so impure, that not even the
mother of the foulmouthed players themselves could have formed
one of the audience:"

Continuing, he said, "the lewd actions and filthy words with
which these players honoured the mother of the gods, . . . they
could not for very shame have rehearsed at home in presence of
their own mothers. 

Effeminate men were consecrated to the Great Mother, and in the
rites of Liber (the god of the seed of fruits and animals) the
devotees worshiped "the private parts of a man." 

During the ceremonial rites dedicated to the Great Mother, a
young man stood beneath a platform upon which a steer was
slaughtered and showered himself with the animal's blood. After
the blood bath, the gore-covered mystic offered himself to the
veneration of the crowd. The ceremony was known as the
taurobolia. St Peter's Basilica in Rome stands on the very spot
where the last taurobolia toke place at the end of the fourth
century. 

The Egyptian goddess Isis, was honored especially by "women with
whom love was a profession." Juvenal referred to her as a
procuress, and her temples "were frequented by young men in quest
of gallant adventures." 

The morals of the cult of Isis and Osiris were viewed by the
Roman community at large as very loose, and the mystery
surrounding it excited the worst suspicions. Additionally, its
secret societies were suspected of easily becoming "clubs of
agitators and haunts of spies."

Consequently, the Roman Senate had the altars dedicatedl to these
mysteries torn down on five separate occasions, 59 B.C., 58 B.C.,
53 B.C. and 48 B.C. 

The celebrations associated with the worship of Isis included the
"Finding of Osiris," a ceremony commonly used in Masonic
initiations. In the ceremony, Osiris is killed by an opponent's
attack, after which the former is buried. The attacker is
vanquished by Horus, the son of Isis and Osiris, and the dead
father is restored to life. 

Astrology-a practice condenmed in both the Old and New
Testaments-influenced the Mysteries of Mithra. 

Persia introduced dualism as a fundamental principle of religion,
and deified the evil principle. It was taught that both evil and
the supreme deity must be worshiped. Also, Persian Mithraism
preached absolute fidelity to its oaths. And like Masonry, it
preached fraternity. "All the initiates considered themselves as
sons of the same father owing to one another a brother's
affection. 

This dualism taught that the world is the scene of perpetual
struggle between two powers that share mastery. The true believer
was constantly in combat with evil in order to bring about the
triumph of Ormuzd. 

The Persian Mazdeans brought the dimension of magic to their
rites and made their "mysteries" a reversed religion with a
liturgy focused on the infernal powers. "There was no miracle the
experienced magician might not expect to perform with the aid of
demons. . . . Hence the number of impious practices performed in
the dark, practices the horror of which is equaled only by their
absurdity: preparing beverages that disturbed the senses and
impaired the intellect; mixing subtle poisons extracted from
demoniac plants and corpses already in the state of putridity;
immolating children in order to read the future in their
quivering entrails or to conjure up ghosts . . ."

These were some of the "Ancient Mysteries" about which Freemasons
boast of being the modern successors.

These mysteries are based on myths. There never was a real
Mithra, nor a Great Mother, nor an Isis nor Osiris.

That is why the "Mysteries" passed from the scene with the advent
of Christianity. The new religion could boast of a Founder of
unique holiness and power who actually lived among men and women.
His teachings were new, arresting, different, and promised
salvation not to the select few, but to all mankind.

The ethical ideals yearned for by men through the ages, and the
Redeemer and Savior spoken of through unnumbered generations,
became incarnated upon earth. True God and True Man entered
history, and the world has not been the same since. Indeed,
history is divided by all that happened in the world Before
Christ and in the Years of Our Lord-B.C. and A.D.