A Response to Critics of Freemasonry

From Northern Ireland to
Iran, from the Middle East to the United
States, religious extremism is a growing force
throughout the wor1d. Jarred by the rapid pace of
social and cultural change, especially the appar-
ent disintegration of moral values and the breakup
of the family, some people within this move-
ment have sought refuge from the complexity of
modern life by embracing absolute views and
rejecting tolerance of other beliefs.
   Simple, easy, seemingly stable answers bring
comfort in a rapidly changing world. For ex-
ample, some churches have responded to the
personal anguish of their members by circling
the wagons, that is, by strictly defining
theological concepts and insisting their mem-
bers "purify" their fellowship by renouncing any
other beliefs.
  The next step, already taken by various
churches, is to yield degrees of control within
their ranks to vocal factions espousing extremist
views.  These splinter groups focus the
congregation's generalized anxieties on spe-
cific targets. The proffered cure-all is to destroy
the supposed enemy. Freemasonry has become
one of these targets precisely because it encour-
ages members to form their own opinion on many
important topics, including religion.
  Thus some churches have expressed con-
cerns, even condemnations, of Freemasonry.
Generally, these actions are based on misun-
derstandings. A case in point is the June 1993
report to the Southern Baptist Convention by
the Convention's Home Mission Board. This
report defined eight alleged conflicts between
the tenets and teachings of the Masonic
Fraternity and Southern Baptist theology.
  Let's briefly look at those areas as rep-
resentative of the thinking of some well-
meaning but misinformed church members
today, and see if the concerns are real or
simply a matter of misinformation or
misunderstanding.
  Most of the issues really deal with language
in one way or another. Almost every organiza-
tion has a social vocabulary of words which are
understood by the group. lt's hardly appropriate
for someone outside a group, and without the
special knowledge of the group, to object to the
terms unless he or she fully understands them
and why they are used.
  If someone wants to read the, Journal of the
American Medical Association, for example,
that is his right-but he doesn't have a right to
complain the articles use medical terms. A
person reading a cookbook had better know
terms like fold, cream the butter, or soft ball
have special meanings-or he'll make a mess
instead of a cake.
  The same is true of a non-Mason reading
Masonic materials. As to the critique of Free-
masonry by the Southern Baptist Convention
(which, incidentally, had several positive
things to say about Masonry), here is a
brief explanatory discussion of each point


"Offensive Titles"

  Some don't understand the historic source Of
the terms used in Freemasonry. They complain
of "offensive" titles such as Worshipful Master
for the leader of a Lodge. This is simply a matter
of misunderstanding. The leader of the Lodge is
called the Master of the Lodge for the same
reason the leader of an orchestra is called the
Concert Master, or a highly skilled electrician is
called a Master Electrician, or the leader of a
Scout troop is called a Scoutmaster.
  Masonic use of the term Master originated
in the guilds of the Middle Ages when the
person most skillful was called the Master.
Much Masonic vocabulary dates from that
period. For instance, "Worshipful" is a term
still used in England and Canada today to refer
to such officials as mayors of cities. Worshipful
John Doe means exactly the same thing as The
Honorable John Doe.
 Also, in the John Wycliffe translation of the
Bible, "Honor thy father and thy Mother" is
translated "Worchyp thy fadir and thy modir."
Some persons seem not to distinguish between
"worshipful" and "worshipable." There is
certainly nothing irreligious in the title as used
in Masonry.

"Archaic, Offensive Rituals"
  Some object to the use of "archaic, offensive
rituals" and what they term "bloody oaths."
There is nothing offensive in Masonic rituals, at
least not to anyone who understands them. They
are ancient, many of them so old their origins
are long lost in history. But there is nothing bad
in that. Many creeds and statements of faith are
far older than the Masonic rituals. The Lord's
Prayer is 2,000 years old, but no one suggests it
be updated just because it was set down long
ago. The Declaration of Independence is about the
sarme age as the Master Mason degree, but few
complain that it is "archaic."
  As to the allegedly "bloody oaths," the his-
toric penalties associated with the Masonic
obligations have their origins in the legal system
of medieval Europe and were actual punish-
ments inflicted by the state on persons guilty of
fighting for civil liberty and religious freedom.
Included in the accused were many of the
martyrs who died to secure the principle of
religious toleration.
  In Masonry, these penalties are entirely
symbolic. They refer to the shame a good
man should feel at the thought he had broken
a promise, and they remind us of the price so
many have paid for the liberties and freedoms
Masons are pledged to protect.


"Pagansim"

  Some critics of Freemasonry claim the rec-
ommended readings for some of the degrees of
Masonry are "pagan." Pagan, as they are using
the tenn, simply means Pre-Christian. The study
of man's moral and intellectual history allows
the achievement of Masonry's major pur-
pose, the enhancement of an individual's moral
and intellectual development. Such a study
has to start with the concepts of man and God
as held by early cultures and evidenced in
their mythologies. The Greeks and Romans, as
well as earlier peoples, had much of importance
to say on many topics, including religion. The
idea that a physician must act in the best inter-
ests of his patient comes from the pagan
Hippocrates, and the concept that the govern-
ment cannot break into your house and take
what it wants on a whim comes from the pagan
Aristotle. None of us would want to live in a
world without these ideas.
   In almost every field-law, government, music,
philosophy, mathematics, etc. -it is necessary to
review the work of early writers and thinkers.
Masonry is no exception. But to study the work
of ancient cultures is not the same thing as to do
what they did or believe what they believed.
And no Mason is ever told what he should
believe in matters of faith. That is not the
task of a fraternity, nor a public library, nor
the government. That is the duty of a person's
revealed religion and is appropriately
expressed through his or her church.


The Bible as "Furniture"

  Ironically, some people complain about the
Bible in the lodge being referred to in Masoruc
ritual as the "furniture of the lodge." Again, it's a
matter of not understanding how Masons use the
word. Freemasons use "furniture" in its original
meaning of "essential equipment."  All lodges
must have a Volume of the Sacred Law open
during every meeting. In North America, this is
almost always the Bible which is an essential
part of Freemasonry and its ritual.


Tha Meaning of "Light"

   Others critics of Freemasonry are concerned
that when Masons use "light" someone might
think the word is referring to salvation rather
than truth or knowledge. But that's a word
confusion again. Light was a symbol of knowl-
edge long before it was a symbol of salvation.
The lamp of learning appears on almost every
graduation card and college diploma. Masonry
uses light as a symbol of the search for truth and
knowledge. It is very unlikely any Mason would
think Masonic "light" represents salvation.


"Salvation by Works"

 Some believe Freemasonry teaches salva-
tion may be attained by one's good works.
Masonry does not teach any path to salvation.
That is the job of a church, not a fraternity. The
closest Masonry comes to this issue is to point
to the open Bible and tell the Mason to search
there for the path to eternal life.
   Masonry believes in the importance of doing
good works, but as a matter of gratitude to God
for His many great gifts and as a matter of
individual moral and social responsibility.  The
path to salvation is found in each Mason's house
of worship, not in his lodge.


"Universalism"

   There are those who claim some Masonic
writers teach the "heresy of universalism."
Universalism is the doctrine that all men and
women are ultimately saved. Masonry does
not teach universalism nor any other doctrine
of salvation. Again, doctrines of salvation are
the province of a church, not a fraternity. In point
of fact, one has to look rather hard to find those
"many Masonic writers" who supposedly teach
universalism, but even if you could fmd one,
he's writing a statement of personal opinion.  lt's
important to remember that any Masonic author
writes for himself alone, not as an offcial of the
Masonic fraternity. Masonry simply does not
have a position, official or otherwise, on salva-
tion. Since men of all faiths are welcome in
Freemasonry, Masons are careful not to offend
the faith of any. Possibly, that may seem to be
universalism to some critics. Masons call it
common courtesy.


Racial Exclusion

   Some critics, more eager to attack Free-
masonry than to put their own houses in
order, allege "most Lodges refuse to admit
African-Americans as members." Masonry
is not a whites-only organization, as the hun-
dreds of thousands of Black, Native American,
Hispanic and Oriental Masons all over the
world can testify. The petition for Masonic
membership does not ask the race of the
petitioner, and it would be considered com-
pletely wrong to do so.
   At the international celebration of the 275th
anniversary of the Grand Lodge of England in
1992 (the most recent Masonic gathering of
about the same size as the Southern Baptist
Convention) there were far more people of color
present than there were at the Southem Baptist
Convention in Houston in 1993.
  At the same time, Masonry in Amenca, like
churches and society in general, has not lived up
to its teaching of brotherhood as well as it
should. That is changing, in Masonry as in
society. While it is still true, as Martin Luther
King, Jr., remarked, "Sunday morning at
10:00 is still the most segregated hour in
America," it's getting better throughout all
organizations.


Masonry Compatible with Christianity
and Other Religions

  Clearly, Freemasonry is compatible with
religion. It may be incompatible, however,
with the way a few narrowly focused people
see religion. Of course, most of them feel that
only they have the truth and that even many
members of their own congregations are not
as pure as they should be.
  Masonry stands, as it has always stood,
with open arms, saying, "Believe as your
conscience dictates, and if you are a good
man who believes in God and that there is
something more to life than bread and
circuses, if you believe that you have a
responsibility to develop yourself and to
benefit others, come join us."
  Freemasonry is simply a fraternity-an
organization of men banded together to develop
themselves further ethically and morally and to
benefit the community at large. Give yourself a
chance to find out who we are. We're the next-
door neighbors you've known all your life.

------------------------------------------------


  The Masonic Information Center is a divi-
sion of The Masonic Service Association.
The Center was founded in 1993 by a
grant from John J. Robinson, well-
known author, speaker, and Mason.
Its purpose is to provide information
on Freemasonry to Masons and non-
Masons alike and to respond to critics
of Freemasonry. The Center is directed
by a Steering Committee of distinguished
Masons geographically representative
of the Craft throughout the United
States and Canada.
------------------------------------------------

Masonic Information Center
8120 Fenton Street
Silver Spring, Maryland  20910-4785
Tel 301-588-4010
Fax 301-608-3457